An Epistemological Approach to Modeling: Cases Studies and Implications for Science Teaching

Models and modeling are a major issue in science studies and in science education. In addressing such an issue, we first propose an epistemological discussion based on the works of Cartwright (1983, 1999), Fleck (1935/1979), and Hacking (1983). This leads us to emphasize the transitions between the abstract and the concrete in the modeling process, by using the notions of nomogical machine (Cartwright, 1999), language game (Wittgenstein, 1953/1997), and thought style (Fleck, 1935/1979). Then, in the light of our epistemological approach, we study four cases coming from the implementations of research-based design activities (SESAMES, 2007). These four case studies illustrate how students are engaged in constructing relations between the abstract and the concrete through modeling activities, by elaborating at the same time specific language games and appropriate thought styles. Finally, we draw some implications for science teaching. It is suggested that considering didactic nomological machines as embedding knowledge on the one hand, and classes as thought collectives, on the other hand, may relevantly contribute to science education and science education research. C

[1]  N. Lambert,et al.  The Threefold Cord , 2008 .

[2]  Ismo T. Koponen,et al.  Models and Modelling in Physics Education: A Critical Re-analysis of Philosophical Underpinnings and Suggestions for Revisions , 2007 .

[3]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Reconsidering the Character and Role of Inquiry in School Science: Analysis of a Conference , 2007 .

[4]  I. Koponen,et al.  Generative Role of Experiments in Physics and in Teaching Physics: A Suggestion for Epistemological Reconstruction , 2006 .

[5]  Falk RIESS,et al.  Reconstructing Galileo’s Inclined Plane Experiments for Teaching Purposes , 2006 .

[6]  Per-Olof Wickman,et al.  Aesthetic Experience in Science Education: Learning and Meaning-Making as Situated Talk and Action , 2005 .

[7]  M. Fabre Deux sources de l'épistémologie des problèmes : Dewey et Bachelard , 2005 .

[8]  Maria-Luisa Schubauer-Leoni,et al.  An Attempt to Model the Teacher’S Action in the Mathematics Class , 2005 .

[9]  A. Tiberghien,et al.  Physics teaching sequences and students' learning. , 2005 .

[10]  A. Tiberghien,et al.  Etude de l'activité des élèves de lycée en situation d'enseignement de la physique , 2005 .

[11]  Maria-Luisa Schubauer-Leoni,et al.  An attempt to model the teacher's action in mathematics , 2005 .

[12]  Hatice Asuman Küçüközer L'étude de l'évolution de la compréhension conceptuelle des élèves avec un enseignement : cas de la mécanique en 1ère S , 2005 .

[13]  P. Wickman The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work , 2004 .

[14]  A. Tiberghien,et al.  Learning hypotheses and an associated tool to design and to analyse teaching–learning sequences , 2004 .

[15]  Katalin Farkas Review: The Threefold Cord: Mind, Body and World , 2003 .

[16]  Mercè Izquierdo-Aymerich,et al.  Epistemological Foundations of School Science , 2003 .

[17]  Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier,et al.  Méthodes de raisonnement , 2003 .

[18]  Leif Östman,et al.  Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism , 2002 .

[19]  Per-Olof Wickman,et al.  Induction as an empirical problem: How students generalize during practical work , 2002 .

[20]  G. Sensevy Représentations et action didactique , 2002 .

[21]  Sibel Erduran,et al.  Philosophy of Chemistry: An Emerging Field with Implications for Chemistry Education , 2001 .

[22]  Rosária Justi,et al.  History and philosophy of science through models: some challenges in the case of 'the atom' , 2000 .

[23]  Jean-Léon Beauvois,et al.  Affordances in social judgment: Experimental proof of why it is a mistake to ignore how others behave towards a target and look solely at how the target behaves , 2000 .

[24]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Improving science education : the contribution of research , 2000 .

[25]  N. Cartwright The dappled world : a study of the boundaries of science , 1999 .

[26]  Sibel Erduran Making sense: Simulation‐of‐Research in organic chemistry education , 1998 .

[27]  A. Tiberghien Modeling as a basis for analyzing teaching-learning situations , 1994 .

[28]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Psychology of everyday things , 1990 .

[29]  M. Douglas How Institutions Think , 1986 .

[30]  C. Wright Representing and Intervening , 1985 .

[31]  H. Kyburg,et al.  How the laws of physics lie , 1984 .

[32]  Otto Neurath,et al.  Philosophical Papers, 1913-1946 , 1983 .

[33]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[34]  R. Merton,et al.  Genesis and development of a scientific fact , 1979 .

[35]  I. Hacking Why does language matter to philosophy , 1976 .

[36]  Ian Hacking,et al.  Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy?: The heyday of ideas , 1975 .

[37]  G. Ryle,et al.  The concept of mind. , 2004, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[38]  L. Wittgenstein Philosophical investigations = Philosophische Untersuchungen , 1958 .

[39]  L. Wittgenstein,et al.  Philosophische Untersuchungen = Philosophical investigations , 1953 .

[40]  Galileo Galilei,et al.  Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences , 1914 .