The configuration and application of helical membrane modules in MBR

Abstract Membrane fouling can be greatly reduced by increasing the turbulence near membrane surfaces via enhancing aeration intensity or using helical baffles. A newly designed helical membrane served that purpose and achieved flux enhancement without increasing the aeration intensity or energy consumption. In this paper, the particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique was used to demonstrate the difference in intensity and distribution of flow field/velocity vectors between the helical and the flat sheet membrane modules. The results showed that the helical membrane produced rotational flows near the membrane surface and enhanced the shearing rate/flow velocity. To further optimize the membrane geometries (dimensions and angles) and investigate the influence of membrane spacing and membrane piece numbers in a helical membrane module on its performance in filtering sludge suspensions in membrane bioreactor (MBR), various membrane modules were studied. To the single piece membrane module of different dimensions, the average flux of a helical membrane was 17–37.5% higher than that of a flat membrane. The more slender membranes had better fouling reduction and higher flux enhancement. For multi-piece membrane module, 8 piece helical module enjoyed more favorable flow dynamics, great fouling reductions and an enhancement of the average flux over 50% than the 8 piece flat module. An appropriate spacing and a lower trans-membrane pressure (TMP) was important for achieving higher permeate flux, and the use of flocculants significantly increased the sludge permeability and the permeate flux using the helical membrane in MBR.

[1]  N. Dizge,et al.  Influence of type and pore size of membranes on cross flow microfiltration of biological suspension , 2011 .

[2]  K. Tung,et al.  Effect of particle size on the performance of cross-flow microfiltration , 2006 .

[3]  Marian Muste,et al.  Large Scale Particle Image Velocimetry for Low Velocity and Shallow Water Flows , 2004 .

[4]  C. Fonade,et al.  Flux enhancement in crossflow filtration using an unsteady jet , 1997 .

[5]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Flux enhancement in crossflow microfiltration using a collapsible-tube pulsation generator , 1993 .

[6]  S. Monismith,et al.  A hybrid digital particle tracking velocimetry technique , 1997 .

[7]  K. Chung,et al.  Flux enhancement in a helical microfiltration module with gas injection , 2005 .

[8]  A. Jönsson Influence of shear rate on the flux during ultrafiltration of colloidal substances , 1993 .

[9]  F. Wong,et al.  Enhancement of filterability in MBR achieved by improvement of supernatant and floc characteristics via filter aids addition. , 2008, Water research.

[10]  Sheng Chang Filtration of biomass with axial inter-fibre upward slug flow: performance and mechanisms , 2000 .

[11]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  The effect of fibre diameter on filtration and flux distribution — relevance to submerged hollow fibre modules , 2001 .

[12]  Robert W. Field,et al.  A helical baffle for cross-flow microfiltration , 1995 .

[13]  Fenglin Yang,et al.  A new helical membrane module for increasing permeate flux , 2010 .

[14]  André Larbot,et al.  An experimental study of helically stamped ceramic microfiltration membranes using bentonite suspensions , 2001 .

[15]  T. Cheng,et al.  Gas-sparging cross-flow ultrafiltration in flat-plate membrane module: Effects of channel height and membrane inclination , 2007 .

[16]  Abdul Latif Ahmad,et al.  Baffled microfiltration membrane and its fouling control for feed water of desalination , 2004 .

[17]  K. Scott,et al.  Intensified membrane filtration with corrugated membranes , 2000 .

[18]  Céline Picard,et al.  Flux enhancement in microfiltration by corkscrew vortices formed in helical flow passages , 2002 .

[19]  Pierre R. Bérubé,et al.  Shear profiles inside gas sparged submerged hollow fiber membrane modules , 2007 .

[20]  T. Maruyama,et al.  Effect of surface roughness of hollow fiber membranes with gear-shaped structure on membrane fouling by sodium alginate , 2011 .

[21]  N. Ghaffour,et al.  Flux enhancement by using helical baffles in ultrafiltration of suspended solids , 2004 .

[22]  H. Boisson,et al.  Hydrodynamic aspects of filtration antifouling by helically corrugated membranes , 2000 .

[23]  Keith Scott,et al.  Mass transfer characteristics of cross-corrugated membranes , 2002 .

[24]  Bo Li,et al.  Mathematical model analysis on the enhancement of aeration efficiency using ladder-type flat membrane module forms in the Submerged Membrane Bio-reactor (SMBR) , 2009 .