A sequential procurement model for a PPP project pipeline

Public–private partnerships have seen the daylight in response to the adagio that project responsibilities and risks should be efficiently allocated between the public and the private sector. Nevertheless, the considerable bidding costs inhibit the competition in the market. A trustworthy project agenda, also called a project pipeline, could substantiate the PPP market’s attractiveness in the belief that a current success results in a knowledge and cost advantage in future tenders. This paper builds a sequential PPP procurement model and heuristically approximates the Markov perfect equilibrium in which contractors determine how much money they are willing to invest in the bid preparation and which mark-up is appropriate for each project in the pipeline. A pipeline of projects pushes down the mark-ups and the government procurement cost. Nonetheless, according to the experiments, only players with an initial experiential advantage tend to make higher investment efforts so that additional governmental policies, like a fractional reimbursement of the bid preparation efforts, might be required to level the playing field.

[1]  Ronald M. Harstad Auctioning the Right to Choose When Competition Persists , 2010, Decis. Anal..

[2]  Catherine Wolfram Strategic Bidding in a Multiunit Auction: An Empirical Analysis of Bids to Supply Electricity in England and Wales , 1998 .

[3]  Martin Pesendorfer,et al.  Optimal sequential auctions , 2014 .

[4]  Marcel Weverbergh,et al.  Cost Uncertainty in Competitive Bidding Models , 1978 .

[5]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Stochastic Search Methods for Nash Equilibrium Approximation in Simulation-based Games , 2022 .

[6]  Erik Demeulemeester,et al.  Towards a More Competitive PPP Procurement Market: A Game-Theoretical Analysis , 2014 .

[7]  Robert Zeithammer Commitment in sequential auctioning: advance listings and threshold prices , 2009 .

[8]  Michael N. Katehakis,et al.  On bidding for a fixed number of items in a sequence of auctions , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Alan Mercer,et al.  The optimum markup when bidding with uncertain costs , 1990 .

[10]  S. Ping Ho Bid Compensation Decision Model for Projects with Costly Bid Preparation , 2005 .

[11]  J. Reiß,et al.  First-price equilibrium and revenue equivalence in a sequential procurement auction model , 2007 .

[12]  Dirk Bergemann,et al.  Information Acquisition and Efficient Mechanism Design , 2000 .

[13]  Jeff Zitron,et al.  Public–private partnership projects: Towards a model of contractor bidding decision-making , 2006 .

[14]  Robert Zeithammer,et al.  Research Note - Strategic Bid-Shading and Sequential Auctioning with Learning from Past Prices , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Ranjan Agrawal Successful delivery of public- private partnerships for Infrastructure development , 2011 .

[16]  Graeme Bowles,et al.  Public–private partnerships and contract negotiations: an empirical study , 2004 .

[17]  P. Monteiro,et al.  Auctions with synergies and asymmetric buyers , 2004 .

[18]  N. M. Fehr,et al.  PREDATORY BIDDING IN SEQUENTIAL AUCTIONS , 1994 .

[19]  P. Lam,et al.  Critical Success Factors for PPPs in Infrastructure Developments: Chinese Perspective , 2010 .

[20]  Shu-Cherng Fang,et al.  An Electromagnetism-like Mechanism for Global Optimization , 2003, J. Glob. Optim..

[21]  R. M. Stark,et al.  Auctions, Bidding, and Contracting: Uses and Theory , 1983 .

[22]  Vivek F. Farias,et al.  An approximate dynamic programming approach to solving dynamic oligopoly models , 2012 .

[23]  Johannes Hörner,et al.  Sequential Common-Value Auctions with Asymmetrically Informed Bidders , 2008 .

[24]  Catherine Wolfram Strategic Bidding in a Multi-Unit Auction: An Empirical Analysis of Bids to Supply Electricity , 1997 .

[25]  Richard Engelbrecht-Wiggans,et al.  Sequential auctions of stochastically equivalent objects , 1994 .

[26]  Marcus Jefferies Critical success factors of public private sector partnerships: A case study of the Sydney SuperDome , 2006 .

[27]  Thomas D. Jeitschko,et al.  Stochastic Synergies in Sequential Auctions , 2005 .

[28]  Sequential auctions for stochastically equivalent complementary objects , 2006 .

[29]  Fernando Branco,et al.  Sequential auctions with synergies: An example , 1997 .

[30]  Balakrishna J. Prabhu,et al.  On the convergence of the best-response algorithm in routing games , 2013, VALUETOOLS.

[31]  L. Shapley,et al.  Stochastic Games* , 1953, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Participation, barriers, and opportunities in PFI: the United Kingdom experience , 2008 .

[33]  Robert Zeithammer Strategic Bid-Shading and Sequential Auctioning with Learning from Past Prices , 2006 .

[34]  Q. Shen,et al.  A review of studies on Public–Private Partnership projects in the construction industry , 2010 .

[35]  Wedad Elmaghraby,et al.  The Importance of Ordering in Sequential Auctions , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities , 1990 .

[37]  Eric Maskin,et al.  Markov Perfect Equilibrium: I. Observable Actions , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[38]  Xianwen Shi Optimal Auctions with Information Acquisition , 2011 .

[39]  L. Shapley,et al.  REGULAR ARTICLEPotential Games , 1996 .

[40]  Yi-Kai Juan,et al.  Exploring the Bidding Situation for Economically Most Advantageous Tender Projects Using a Bidding Game , 2006 .

[41]  Brett Katzman,et al.  A Two Stage Sequential Auction with Multi-Unit Demands☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[42]  R. Weber Multiple-Object Auctions , 1981 .

[43]  N. Persico Information acquisition in auctions , 2000 .

[44]  Maher Said,et al.  Sequential Auctions with Randomly Arriving Buyers , 2011, Games Econ. Behav..

[45]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Algorithmic Game Theory , 2007 .

[46]  Huseyin Yildirim,et al.  Piecewise procurement of a large-scale project , 2004 .

[47]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Research Trend of Public-Private Partnership in Construction Journals , 2009 .

[48]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  A theory of auctions and competitive bidding , 1982 .

[49]  Predatory Bidding in Sequential Auctions Hikmet , .

[50]  Karthik N. Kannan,et al.  Declining Prices in Sequential Auctions with Complete Revelation of Bids , 2010 .

[51]  Jeffrey S. Russell,et al.  Analyzing the Role of National PPP Units in Promoting PPPs: Using New Institutional Economics and a Case Study , 2012 .

[52]  Jingfeng Yuan,et al.  Developing Key Performance Indicators for Public-Private Partnership Projects: Questionnaire Survey and Analysis , 2012 .

[53]  Shmuel S. Oren,et al.  Optimal bidding in sequential auctions , 1974, CDC 1974.

[54]  Masaaki Muraki,et al.  A sequential competitive bidding strategy considering inaccurate cost estimates , 2014 .

[55]  Ashish Sureka,et al.  Using tabu best-response search to find pure strategy nash equilibria in normal form games , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[56]  Martin Pesendorfer,et al.  Estimation of a Dynamic Auction Game , 2001 .

[57]  Xiaohua Jin,et al.  Determinants of Efficient Risk Allocation in Privately Financed Public Infrastructure Projects in Australia , 2010 .

[58]  Carolyn Pitchik,et al.  Budget-constrained sequential auctions with incomplete information , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..