Cellular signaling is potentially regulated by cell density in receptor trafficking networks

Previous work has shown that receptor trafficking is a potential site for the control of signaling pathways. In most biological experiments, the ligand concentration and cell density vary within a wide range among different systems. However, there is less attention to systematically analyze how much cellular signal response is affected by cell densities. Here, we use a quantitative mathematical model to investigate signal responses in different receptor trafficking networks by simultaneous variations of ligand concentration and cell density. Computational analysis of the model revealed that receptor trafficking networks have potential sigmoid responses to ratio between ligand and surface receptor number per cell, which is a key factor to control the signaling responses in receptor trafficking networks. Furthermore, cell density also affects the robustness of dose–response curve upon the variation of binding affinity.

[1]  H. Wiley,et al.  Relationship between epidermal growth factor receptor occupancy and mitogenic response. Quantitative analysis using a steady state model system. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[2]  J. Gruenberg,et al.  Sonic Hedgehog Induces the Segregation of Patched and Smoothened in Endosomes , 2002, Current Biology.

[3]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  In silico identification of the key components and steps in IFN‐γ induced JAK‐STAT signaling pathway , 2005, FEBS letters.

[4]  Christopher M. Tan,et al.  Membrane trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors. , 2004, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[5]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[6]  Edouard C. Nice,et al.  Ligand-induced Dimer-Tetramer Transition during the Activation of the Cell Surface Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-A Multidimensional Microscopy Analysis* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[8]  F. Watt,et al.  Cell shape controls terminal differentiation of human epidermal keratinocytes. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  James Briscoe,et al.  The interpretation of morphogen gradients , 2006, Development.

[10]  E. Gilles,et al.  Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  L. Avigliano,et al.  Dehydroascorbic acid uptake in a human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) is glutathione-independent. , 2000, The Biochemical journal.

[12]  J. Fischer,et al.  Endocytosis, endosome trafficking, and the regulation of Drosophila development. , 2006, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[13]  H. Steven Wiley,et al.  A steady state model for analyzing the cellular binding, internalization and degradation of polypeptide ligands , 1981, Cell.

[14]  S Vuk-Pavlović,et al.  Binding, internalization, and intracellular processing of protein ligands. Derivation of rate constants by computer modeling. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  Jeffrey L. Wrana,et al.  Clathrin- and non-clathrin-mediated endocytic regulation of cell signalling , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[16]  D A Lauffenburger,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the EGF receptor autocrine system reveals cryptic regulation of cell response by ligand capture. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[17]  D. Odde,et al.  Potential for Control of Signaling Pathways via Cell Size and Shape , 2006, Current Biology.

[18]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Quantification of Short Term Signaling by the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  A. Miyawaki,et al.  1H1710 Lateral Propagation of EGF SIgnaling after Local Stimulation Is Dependent on Receptor Density , 2002 .

[20]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Lateral propagation of EGF signaling after local stimulation is dependent on receptor density. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[21]  G. Halder,et al.  Lethal Giant Discs, a Novel C2-Domain Protein, Restricts Notch Activation during Endocytosis , 2006, Current Biology.

[22]  Hugo J Bellen,et al.  When cell biology meets development: endocytic regulation of signaling pathways. , 2002, Genes & development.

[23]  J. Wrana,et al.  Distinct endocytic pathways regulate TGF-beta receptor signalling and turnover. , 2003, Nature cell biology.

[24]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  The Roles of APC and Axin Derived from Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of the Wnt Pathway , 2003, PLoS biology.

[25]  H Steven Wiley,et al.  Trafficking of the ErbB receptors and its influence on signaling. , 2003, Experimental cell research.

[26]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Morphogen gradient interpretation , 2001, Nature.

[27]  H. Steven Wiley,et al.  Cell Surface Receptors for Signal Transduction and Ligand Transport: A Design Principles Study , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  Martin Raff,et al.  Differences in the way a mammalian cell and yeast cells coordinate cell growth and cell-cycle progression , 2003, Journal of biology.

[29]  D A Lauffenburger,et al.  Mathematical Model for the Effects of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Trafficking Dynamics on Fibroblast Proliferation Responses , 1992, Biotechnology progress.