A crowdsourcing-based methodology using smartphones for bridge health monitoring

This article presents a novel framework for monitoring and evaluation of a population of bridges using smartphones in a large number of moving vehicles as mobile sensors. Within this framework, a damage detection methodology based on Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients and Kullback–Leibler divergence is developed. For this method, Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients of the vibration data collected from smartphones in vehicles crossing bridges are first extracted as features. Then, Kullback–Leibler divergence is used to compare the distributions of features. The damage in a bridge can be identified by quantifying the difference of the distributions obtained for the same bridge. Both numerical and lab experiments are conducted to verify the proposed framework and methodology. In lab experiments, a smartphone and two wireless accelerometers are used for data collection. From our results, it is concluded that the damage existence can be successfully identified using smartphones in a large number of vehicles. Also, it is observed that there is a significant correlation between the magnitude of the damage features and the severity of damage. The results show that the method has the potential to monitor a population of bridges simultaneously and in almost real time.

[1]  Gang Zhang,et al.  Application of Noise Cancelling and Damage Detection Algorithms in NDE of Concrete Bridge Decks Using Impact Signals , 2011 .

[2]  Seng Tjhen Lie,et al.  Damage detection method based on operating deflection shape curvature extracted from dynamic response of a passing vehicle , 2013 .

[3]  Hui Li,et al.  Compressive sensing of wireless sensors based on group sparse optimization for structural health monitoring , 2018 .

[4]  Patrick J. McGetrick,et al.  Experimental validation of a drive-by stiffness identification method for bridge monitoring , 2015 .

[5]  Eugene J. O'Brien,et al.  Identification of damping in a bridge using a moving instrumented vehicle , 2012 .

[6]  Bayya Yegnanarayana,et al.  Combining evidence from residual phase and MFCC features for speaker recognition , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[7]  Eugene J. O'Brien,et al.  Theoretical investigation of the use of a moving vehicle to identify bridge dynamic parameters , 2009 .

[8]  Eugene J. O'Brien,et al.  Application of empirical mode decomposition to drive-by bridge damage detection , 2017 .

[9]  Zheng Fang,et al.  Comparison of different implementations of MFCC , 2001 .

[10]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  The Citizen Engineer: Urban Infrastructure Monitoring via Crowd-Sourced Data Analytics , 2017 .

[11]  Young-Jin Cha,et al.  Fully automated vision-based loosened bolt detection using the Viola–Jones algorithm , 2019 .

[12]  Raimondo Betti,et al.  A structural health monitoring strategy using cepstral features , 2014 .

[13]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Smart sensing technology: opportunities and challenges , 2004 .

[14]  Eugene J. O'Brien,et al.  On the use of a passing vehicle for the estimation of bridge mode shapes , 2017 .

[15]  Robert B. Randall,et al.  Damage identification based on response-only measurements using cepstrum analysis and artificial neural networks , 2014 .

[16]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  Citizen Sensors for SHM: Towards a Crowdsourcing Platform , 2015, Sensors.

[17]  Patrick J. McGetrick,et al.  Utilizing Moving Vehicles as Sensors for Bridge Condition Screening – A Laboratory Verification , 2017 .

[18]  Mustafa Gul,et al.  Conceptual damage-sensitive features for structural health monitoring: Laboratory and field demonstrations , 2008 .

[19]  I. Elamvazuthi,et al.  Voice Recognition Algorithms using Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC) and Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) Techniques , 2010, ArXiv.

[20]  Eugene J. O'Brien,et al.  A Review of Indirect Bridge Monitoring Using Passing Vehicles , 2015 .

[21]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Vibration-based damage assessment of structures using signal decomposition and two-dimensional visualization techniques , 2019 .

[22]  Divya Bansal,et al.  Road Condition Detection Using Smartphone Sensors : A Survey , 2014 .

[23]  S. Gelfand Essentials of Audiology , 1997 .

[24]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[25]  Yang Wang,et al.  Wireless Mobile Sensor Network for the System Identification of a Space Frame Bridge , 2012, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[26]  D. S. Berry,et al.  Distribution of Vehicle Speeds and Travel Times , 1951 .

[27]  Mustafa Gul,et al.  Damage Assessment with Ambient Vibration Data Using a Novel Time Series Analysis Methodology , 2011 .

[28]  Biswajit Basu,et al.  A Bridge-Vehicle Interaction Based Experimental Investigation of Damage Evolution , 2010 .

[29]  Satish Chandra,et al.  Speed Characteristics of Mixed Traffic Flow on Urban Arterials , 2013 .

[30]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  Hybrid motion sensing and experimental modal analysis using collocated smartphone camera and accelerometers , 2017 .

[31]  K. C. Chang,et al.  Constructing the mode shapes of a bridge from a passing vehicle: a theoretical study , 2014 .

[32]  Z. Xiang,et al.  Damage detection by mode shape squares extracted from a passing vehicle , 2012 .

[33]  Thomas Fang Zheng,et al.  Comparison of different implementations of MFCC , 2001, Journal of Computer Science and Technology.

[34]  Hitoshi Furuta,et al.  A structural damage detection approach using train-bridge interaction analysis and soft computing methods , 2014 .

[35]  Yeong-Bin Yang,et al.  EXTRACTING BRIDGE FREQUENCIES FROM THE DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF A PASSING VEHICLE , 2002 .

[36]  Yeong-Bin Yang,et al.  Vehicle–bridge interaction dynamics and potential applications , 2005 .

[37]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Experimental analysis of vehicle–bridge interaction using a wireless monitoring system and a two-stage system identification technique , 2012 .

[38]  Yeong-Bin Yang,et al.  Vehicle-Bridge Interaction Element for Dynamic Analysis , 1997 .

[39]  Eugene J. O'Brien,et al.  The use of a dynamic truck–trailer drive-by system to monitor bridge damping , 2014 .

[40]  Lawrence Wai-Choong Wong,et al.  A robust dead-reckoning pedestrian tracking system with low cost sensors , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[41]  James H. Garrett,et al.  Indirect structural health monitoring of a simplified laboratory-scale bridge model , 2014 .

[42]  Qipei Mei,et al.  A fixed-order time series model for damage detection and localization , 2016 .

[43]  Suresh Bhalla,et al.  Performance of smart piezoceramic patches in health monitoring of a RC bridge , 2000 .

[44]  Arturo González,et al.  A discussion on the merits and limitations of using drive-by monitoring to detect localised damage in a bridge , 2017 .

[45]  Shamim N. Pakzad,et al.  Smartphone data streams for bridge health monitoring , 2017 .

[46]  李振虎,et al.  Damage identification of bridges from signals measured with a moving vehicle , 2014 .