Publication, discovery and interoperability of Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Linked Data approach

BACKGROUND The high costs involved in the development of Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) make it necessary to share their functionality across different systems and organizations. Service Oriented Architectures (SOA) have been proposed to allow reusing CDSS by encapsulating them in a Web service. However, strong barriers in sharing CDS functionality are still present as a consequence of lack of expressiveness of services' interfaces. Linked Services are the evolution of the Semantic Web Services paradigm to process Linked Data. They aim to provide semantic descriptions over SOA implementations to overcome the limitations derived from the syntactic nature of Web services technologies. OBJECTIVE To facilitate the publication, discovery and interoperability of CDS services by evolving them into Linked Services that expose their interfaces as Linked Data. MATERIALS AND METHODS We developed methods and models to enhance CDS SOA as Linked Services that define a rich semantic layer based on machine interpretable ontologies that powers their interoperability and reuse. These ontologies provided unambiguous descriptions of CDS services properties to expose them to the Web of Data. RESULTS We developed models compliant with Linked Data principles to create a semantic representation of the components that compose CDS services. To evaluate our approach we implemented a set of CDS Linked Services using a Web service definition ontology. The definitions of Web services were linked to the models developed in order to attach unambiguous semantics to the service components. All models were bound to SNOMED-CT and public ontologies (e.g. Dublin Core) in order to count on a lingua franca to explore them. Discovery and analysis of CDS services based on machine interpretable models was performed reasoning over the ontologies built. DISCUSSION Linked Services can be used effectively to expose CDS services to the Web of Data by building on current CDS standards. This allows building shared Linked Knowledge Bases to provide machine interpretable semantics to the CDS service description alleviating the challenges on interoperability and reuse. Linked Services allow for building 'digital libraries' of distributed CDS services that can be hosted and maintained in different organizations.

[1]  Jim Euchner Design , 2014, Catalysis from A to Z.

[2]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Tabulator Redux: writing Into the Semantic Web , 2007 .

[3]  J. Osheroff,et al.  Clinical Decision Support Systems : State of the Art , 2009 .

[4]  David W. Bates,et al.  Synthesis of Research Paper: Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support: Making the Practice of Evidence-based Medicine a Reality , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  Dipak Kalra,et al.  Semantic enrichment of clinical models towards semantic interoperability. The heart failure summary use case , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  Ida Sim,et al.  A taxonomic description of computer-based clinical decision support systems , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[7]  Eider Sanchez,et al.  Extended Reflexive Ontologies for the Generation of Clinical Recommendations , 2015, Cybern. Syst..

[8]  Tonya Hongsermeier,et al.  Research Paper: A Description and Functional Taxonomy of Rule-based Decision Support Content at a Large Integrated Delivery Network , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  James R. Campbell,et al.  Synthesis of Research Paper: The SAGE Guideline Model: Achievements and Overview , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  Kensaku Kawamoto,et al.  Key principles for a national clinical decision support knowledge sharing framework: synthesis of insights from leading subject matter experts , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  Alan L. Rector,et al.  Binding Ontologies & Coding Systems to Electronic Health Records and Messages , 2006, KR-MED.

[13]  Ronald Cornet,et al.  Does SNOMED CT post-coordination scale? , 2014, MIE.

[14]  John Fox,et al.  An ontological approach to modelling tasks and goals , 2006, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[15]  Miguel-Ángel Sicilia,et al.  Integrating reasoning and clinical archetypes using OWL ontologies and SWRL rules , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[16]  Omolola Ogunyemi,et al.  GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines , 2004, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[17]  Adam Souzis,et al.  Semantic Annotations For Wsdl And Xml Schema , 2015 .

[18]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Adam Wright,et al.  Lessons learned from implementing service-oriented clinical decision support at four sites: A qualitative study , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[20]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[21]  Raymond G. Duncan,et al.  A clinical rules taxonomy for the implementation of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system , 2002, AMIA.

[22]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  WSMO-Lite: lightweight semantic descriptions for services on the web , 2007, ECOWS 2007.

[23]  Matthias Samwald,et al.  The Arden Syntax standard for clinical decision support: Experiences and directions , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[24]  John Domingue,et al.  Toward the Next Wave of Services: Linked Services for the Web of Data , 2010, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[25]  Huajun Chen,et al.  The Semantic Web , 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[26]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[27]  Anneke T. M. Goossen-Baremans,et al.  Detailed Clinical Models: A Review , 2010, Healthcare informatics research.

[28]  The Ninth Annual HIMSS Leadership Survey. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. , 1998, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[29]  Dipak Kalra,et al.  Clinical information modeling processes for semantic interoperability of electronic health records: systematic review and inductive analysis , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[30]  Ida Sim,et al.  A Framework for Classifying Decision Support Systems , 2003, AMIA.

[31]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked data , 2020, Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist.

[32]  Catalina Martínez-Costa,et al.  Clinical data interoperability based on archetype transformation , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[33]  David L. Martin,et al.  Semantic Web Services , 2012, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[34]  Markus Krötzsch,et al.  Concurrent Classification of EL Ontologies , 2011, International Semantic Web Conference.

[35]  Dean F Sittig,et al.  Implementation pearls from a new guidebook on improving medication use and outcomes with clinical decision support. Effective CDS is essential for addressing healthcare performance improvement imperatives. , 2009, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[36]  Tran Cao Son,et al.  Semantic Web Services , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[37]  K. Hong,et al.  Meta-analysis of CHADS2 versus CHA2DS2-VASc for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation patients independent of anticoagulation. , 2015, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[38]  E. Shortliffe,et al.  GLIF 3 : a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines , 2004 .

[39]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Interpreting procedures from descriptive guidelines , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[40]  Jacek Kopecky,et al.  iServe: a linked services publishing platform , 2010 .

[41]  Alan L. Rector,et al.  Semantic Interoperability for Better health and Safer Healthcare [34 pages] , 2009 .

[42]  E. Berner,et al.  Clinical Decision Support Systems: Theory and Practice , 1998 .

[43]  Kensaku Kawamoto,et al.  Design, Implementation, Use, and Preliminary Evaluation of SEBASTIAN, a Standards-Based Web Service for Clinical Decision Support , 2005, AMIA.

[44]  Mor Peleg,et al.  Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: A methodological review , 2013, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[45]  Kensaku Kawamoto,et al.  Viewpoint paper: Proposal for Fulfilling Strategic Objectives of the U.S. Roadmap for National Action on Decision Support through a Service-oriented Architecture Leveraging HL7 Services , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[46]  Terry S. Field,et al.  Application of Information Technology: Costs Associated with Developing and Implementing a Computerized Clinical Decision Support System for Medication Dosing for Patients with Renal Insufficiency in the Long-term Care Setting , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[47]  John Fox,et al.  Application of Information Technology: The Syntax and Semantics of the PROforma Guideline Modeling Language , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[48]  Samson W. Tu,et al.  Executing Clinical Practice Guidelines using the SAGE Execution Engine , 2004, MedInfo.

[49]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[50]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Chapter 10 – Human-Intensive Techniques , 2007 .

[51]  Tonya Hongsermeier,et al.  A pilot study of distributed knowledge management and clinical decision support in the cloud , 2013, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[52]  Jos de Bruijn,et al.  Web Service Modeling Ontology , 2005, Appl. Ontology.

[53]  L. Hayden,et al.  Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support: Making the Practice of Evidence-based Medicine a Reality , 2011 .

[54]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..