False belief reasoning and the acquisition of relative clause sentences.

Perner (1991) has claimed that the linguistic structures and reasoning tasks mastered by 4-year-olds share a requirement to handle metarepresentation. In contrast, de Villiers (2000) has argued that they share a requirement to handle misrepresentation. In the current study, a correlation is observed between success on false belief tasks and the acquisition of relative clause sentences. This correlation is not predicted by de Villiers's account because such sentences do not require the handling of misrepresentation, but it is consistent with Perner's account because such sentences do require the handling of metarepresentation. It is proposed that only an account that integrates the accounts of both de Villiers and Perner can explain extant data on language and cognition in 4-year-olds.

[1]  W L Custer,et al.  A comparison of young children's understanding of contradictory representations in pretense, memory, and belief. , 1996, Child development.

[2]  T. Ruffman,et al.  The relation between children's and mothers' mental state language and theory-of-mind understanding. , 2002, Child development.

[3]  C McKee,et al.  Relatives Children Say , 1998, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[4]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Theories of Theories of Mind , 1996 .

[5]  Jennie E. Pyers,et al.  Complements to cognition: a longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding , 2002 .

[6]  David Lebeaux,et al.  Language acquisition and the form of the grammar , 2000 .

[7]  Renata Miljević-Ridjički,et al.  Children's comprehension of war , 1994 .

[8]  V. Stoichiţă,et al.  The Self-Aware Image: An Insight Into Early Modern Meta-Painting , 1997 .

[9]  K. Hansson,et al.  Comprehension and production of relative clauses: a comparison between Swedish impaired and unimpaired children , 2000, Journal of Child Language.

[10]  J. Villiers,et al.  Linguistic determinism and the understanding of false beliefs. , 2000 .

[11]  J. Perner.  The many faces of belief: reflections on Fodor's and the child's theory of mind , 1995, Cognition.

[12]  D. Townsend,et al.  The development of complex sentence processing strategies. , 1980, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[13]  Rosalind Thornton,et al.  Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics , 1998 .

[14]  Patricia J. Brooks,et al.  Inference and Action in Early Causal Reasoning. , 1996 .

[15]  J. Perner.  Understanding the Representational Mind , 1993 .

[16]  Helen Tager-Flusberg,et al.  The influence of language on theory of mind: a training study. , 2003, Developmental science.

[17]  J. de Villiers,et al.  Relative clauses are barriers to wh-movement for young children , 1995, Journal of Child Language.

[18]  P. Harris.  Theories of theories of mind: Desires, beliefs, and language , 1996 .

[19]  L. Bloom,et al.  Language development from two to three , 1995 .

[20]  M. Kinsbourne,et al.  Preschool children's sentence comprehension: strategies with respect to word order , 1980, Journal of Child Language.

[21]  J. Flavell,et al.  Young children's knowledge about visual perception: Further evidence for the Level 1–Level 2 distinction. , 1981 .

[22]  Acquiring a Conception of Mind: A Review of Psychological Research and Theory , 1996 .

[23]  F. Keil,et al.  Thinking Through Language , 2001 .

[24]  Patricia M. Clancy,et al.  Processing strategies in the acquisition of relative clauses: Universal principles and language-specific realizations , 1986, Cognition.

[25]  H. Goodluck,et al.  A reevaluation of the basic operations hypothesis , 1979, Cognition.

[26]  J. Astington,et al.  A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[27]  Simon Baron-Cohen,et al.  Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[28]  H. Goodluck,et al.  Competence and processing in children's grammar of relative clauses , 1982, Cognition.

[29]  Jill de Villiers,et al.  Language and theory of mind: What are the developmental relationships? , 2000 .

[30]  Tomasello,et al.  The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech , 2001 .

[31]  Kenji Hakuta,et al.  Grammatical description versus configurational arrangement in language acquisition: The case of relative clauses in Japanese , 1981, Cognition.

[32]  H. Brown.  Children's comprehension of relativized English sentences. , 1971 .

[33]  J. Flavell,et al.  The early development of inferences about the visual percepts of others. , 1974, Child development.

[34]  Josef Perner,et al.  Want that is understood well before say that, think that, and false belief: a test of de Villiers's linguistic determinism on German-speaking children. , 2003, Child development.

[35]  H. Wellman,et al.  Acquisition of mental state language in Mandarin- and Cantonese-speaking children. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[36]  A. Sheldon.  The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English , 1973 .

[37]  L. Abbeduto.  Language Development: From Two to Three. , 1992 .