The Aggregation of Industrial Performance Information by the Choquet Fuzzy Integral

This study deals with the aggregation of industrial performance information, i.e. with the mechanism which allows the computation of a global performance knowing the partial ones. The performance information is aimed at controlling the production activity, by indicating how the real objective is reached. The characteristics of this kind of aggregation is that the partial performances to be aggregated are, on the one hand, often information of heterogeneous nature (dimension, format). On the other hand, they are associated to diversified and numerous objectives which interacts in different ways (redundant, complementary,...). In this sense, the fuzzy subset theory provides tools to deal with: the heterogeneity of the entities involved, the commensurability of the partial performances expressed in the interval [0,1], and the different behaviors of the aggregation operation (compromise effect, optimistic or pessimistic effect,...). Among all the fuzzy aggregation operators, we consider here, as an illustration, one use of the Choquet fuzzy integral family for modeling the different interactions between the objectives and aggregating their associated performances.

[1]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  Alternative Representations of Discrete Fuzzy Measures for Decision Making , 1997, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[2]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  On equivalence classes of fuzzy connectives-the case of fuzzy integrals , 1995, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[3]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[4]  Lamia Berrah,et al.  Global vision and performance indicators for an industrial improvement approach , 2000 .

[5]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[6]  U. Bititci Modelling of performance measurement systems in manufacturing enterprises , 1995 .

[7]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[8]  Shlomo Globerson,et al.  Issues in developing a performance criteria system for an organization , 1985 .

[9]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[10]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Quantitative fuzzy semantics , 1971, Inf. Sci..

[11]  Andrea Rangone,et al.  An analytical hierarchy process framework for comparing the overall performance of manufacturing departments , 1996 .

[12]  Leonard L Fortuin,et al.  Performance Indicators — Why, Where and How? , 1988 .

[13]  M. Sugeno,et al.  Fuzzy Measures and Integrals: Theory and Applications , 2000 .

[14]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Decision-making in fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[15]  D. Dubois,et al.  Weighted fuzzy pattern matching , 1988 .