What is wrong with current translocations? A review and a decision‐making proposal

Should a species be translocated? Uncertainty regarding the necessity and feasibility of many translocations complicates answering this question. Here, we review translocation projects, both published and unpublished. Our results indicate that most projects (1) addressed fewer than half of the basic criteria established for translocations and (2) were either unjustifiable from a conservation perspective or inadequately designed to guarantee success or preclude negative consequences. We propose a hierarchical decision-making system – an explicit method that integrates existing guidelines, thereby covering a key gap in conservation science – to reduce ambiguity when deciding whether to implement a given translocation project. This method will improve the likelihood of success in translocation projects and contribute to the efficient use of the limited resources available for these conservation efforts.

[1]  J. Bullock,et al.  Reintroduction: challenges and lessons for basic ecology. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  C. Gómez-Campo,et al.  Conservation in Spain, 1980–2000 , 2000 .

[3]  P. Seddon,et al.  Directions in reintroduction biology. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  P. Seddon,et al.  Taxonomic bias in reintroduction projects , 2005 .

[5]  Devra G. Kleiman,et al.  Reintroduction of Captive Mammals for Conservation Guidelines for reintroducing endangered species into the wild , 1989 .

[6]  B. Griffith,et al.  Avian and Mammalian Translocations: Update and Reanalysis of 1987 Survey Data , 1996 .

[7]  J. Olden,et al.  Reframing the debate over assisted colonization , 2011 .

[8]  K. Ralls,et al.  Biological and technical considerations of carnivore translocation: a review , 1999 .

[9]  G. Meffe Techno‐Arrogance and Halfway Technologies: Salmon Hatcheries on the Pacific Coast of North America , 1992 .

[10]  William B. Karesh COST EVALUATION OF INFECTIOUS DISEASE MONITORING AND SCREENING PROGRAMS FOR WILDLIFE TRANSLOCATION AND REINTRODUCTION , 1993 .

[11]  D. Sada,et al.  American Fisheries Society Guidelines for Introductions of Threatened and Endangered Fishes , 1988 .

[12]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  An assessment of the published results of animal relocations , 2000 .

[13]  P. Rees Is there a legal obligation to reintroduce animal species into their former habitats? , 2001, Oryx.

[14]  A. Storfer,et al.  Gene flow and endangered species translocations: a topic revisited , 1999 .

[15]  Jeff Short,et al.  Reintroduction of macropods (Marsupialia: Macropodoidea) in Australia—A review , 1992 .

[16]  B. Griffith,et al.  The influence of valuational and organizational considerations on the success of rare species translocations , 1997 .

[17]  C. K. Dodd,et al.  Relocation, repatriation, and translocation of amphibians and reptiles: Are they conservation strategies that work? , 1991 .

[18]  A. Cunningham Disease Risks of Wildlife Translocations , 1996 .

[19]  Doug P Armstrong,et al.  Developing the Science of Reintroduction Biology , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[20]  Anthony Ricciardi,et al.  Assisted colonization is not a viable conservation strategy. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  M. Carrete,et al.  Is assisted colonization feasible? Lessons from past introductions , 2012 .

[22]  D. Kleiman Animal re-introductions: The Arabian oryx in Oman: Mark R. Stanley Price, Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Studies in Applied Ecology and Resource Management), 1989. £17.50 hbk (xix + 291 pages) ISBN 0 521 34411 5 , 1990 .

[23]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Standards for documenting and monitoring bird reintroduction projects , 2010 .

[24]  T. Garland,et al.  Predictors of Avian and Mammalian Translocation Success: Reanalysis with Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 2022 .

[25]  A. Pullin,et al.  Bias and dispersal in the animal reintroduction literature , 2010, Oryx.

[26]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Directions in conservation biology , 1994 .

[27]  D. Réale,et al.  Value of captive populations for quantitative genetics research. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  J. M. Scott,et al.  Translocation as a Species Conservation Tool: Status and Strategy , 1989, Science.

[29]  A. Sih,et al.  Use of Substitute Species in Conservation Biology , 2005 .

[30]  F. Allendorf,et al.  Identification of management units using population genetic data. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  G. Mason Species differences in responses to captivity: stress, welfare and the comparative method. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  B. Beck,et al.  Criteria for reintroductions , 1994 .

[33]  F. Sarrazin,et al.  Reintroduction: challenges and lessons for basic ecology. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  N. Frazer Sea Turtle Conservation and Halfway Technology , 1992 .

[35]  V. Braithwaite,et al.  The importance of wild populations in studies of animal temperament , 2010 .

[36]  J. Heywood Functional anatomy of bovid upper molar occlusal surfaces with respect to diet , 2010 .