Inhibition of return is not detected using illusory line motion

Inhibition of return (IOR) is the name that has been assigned to a response time (RT) delay to a stimulus presented at a recently stimulated spatial location. A commonly held explanation for the origins of IOR is that perceptual processing is inhibited and that this inhibition translates into slower RT. Three experiments with 10 subjects were used to directly test this perceptual explanation. The first two experiments assessed the level of perceptual facilitation present in the IOR paradigm using the frequency and latency of illusory line motion judgments. Contrary to the predictions of the perceptual view, the line motion and RT measures revealed only speeded processing at previously stimulated spatial locations. Experiment 3 required a simple detection response and used the same stimulus and timing parameters as those in Experiments 1 and 2. IOR was present, replicating the recent finding that judgments based on perceptual qualities of the stimulus do not demonstrate a RT delay, whereas simple detection tasks do show RT inhibition at previously stimulated locations. These findings are discussed in relation to a number of hypotheses about the origin of the RT delay.

[1]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Voluntary and Stimulus-Induced Attention Detected as Motion Sensation , 1993, Perception.

[2]  John K. Tsotsos An inhibitory beam for attentional selection , 1994 .

[3]  L. Stelmach,et al.  Directed attention and perception of temporal order. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[5]  Reflexive and voluntary orienting in detection and discrimination tasks , 1992 .

[6]  W. Neill,et al.  Does “inhibition of return” occur in discrimination tasks? , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  R. Klein,et al.  Does Oculomotor Readiness Mediate Cognitive Control of Visual-Attention - Revisited , 1994 .

[8]  G. Tassinari,et al.  Sensory and attentional components of slowing of manual reaction time to non-fixated visual targets by ipsilateral primes , 1993, Vision Research.

[9]  R A Abrams,et al.  Spatially diffuse inhibition affects multiple locations: a reply to Tipper, Weaver, and Watson (1996). , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  H Egeth,et al.  Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Supramodal and modality-specific mechanisms for stimulus-driven shifts of auditory and visual attention. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[12]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  The line-motion illusion : attention or impletion? , 1997 .

[13]  M. Posner,et al.  Inhibition of return : Neural basis and function , 1985 .

[14]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation , 1993, Vision Research.

[15]  R A Abrams,et al.  Color-based inhibition of return , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Steven P. Tipper,et al.  Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations : Commentary on Pratt and Abrams (1995) , 1996 .

[17]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  14 Attention and the Control of Movements , 1980 .

[18]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  R. Klein,et al.  Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. , 1994 .

[21]  J. Pratt,et al.  Inhibition of return to successively cued spatial locations. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[23]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1981 .

[24]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  Robert Hockey,et al.  Effects of repetition on the facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Visual attention revealed by an illusion of motion , 1993, Neuroscience Research.

[27]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science , 1984 .

[29]  Gary Finley,et al.  A high-speed point plotter for vision research , 1985, Vision Research.

[30]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[31]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  S. Tipper,et al.  A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. , 1994 .

[33]  J. Pratt,et al.  Inhibition of return in a discrimination task , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  R. L. Knoll,et al.  The Perception of Temporal Order: Fundamental Issues and a General Model , 1973 .

[35]  H Egeth,et al.  Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  R. Abrams,et al.  Inhibition of return: effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.