Identifying Anatomical Shape Difference by Regularized Discriminative Direction

Identifying the shape difference between two groups of anatomical objects is important for medical image analysis and computer-aided diagnosis. A method called ldquodiscriminative directionrdquo in the literature has been proposed to solve this problem. In that method, the shape difference between groups is identified by deforming a shape along the discriminative direction. This paper conducts a thorough study about inferring this discriminative direction in an efficient and accurate way. First, finding the discriminative direction is reformulated as a preimage problem in kernel-based learning. This provides a complementary but conceptually simpler solution than the previous method. More importantly, we find that a shape deforming along the original discriminative direction cannot faithfully maintain its anatomical correctness. This unnecessarily introduces spurious shape differences and leads to inaccurate analysis. To overcome this problem, this paper further proposes a regularized discriminative direction by requiring a shape to conform to its underlying distribution when it deforms. Two different approaches are developed to impose the regularization, one from the perspective of probability distributions and the other from a geometric point of view, and their relationship is discussed. After verifying their superior performance through controlled experiments, we apply the proposed methods to detecting and localizing the hippocampal shape difference between sexes. We get results consistent with other independent research, providing a more compact representation of the shape difference compared with the established discriminative direction method.

[1]  C R Jack,et al.  Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical applications and contributions to the understanding of temporal lobe epilepsy. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[2]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[3]  Nick Barnes,et al.  Regularized Discriminative Direction for Shape Difference Analysis , 2008, MICCAI.

[4]  B. Scholkopf,et al.  Fisher discriminant analysis with kernels , 1999, Neural Networks for Signal Processing IX: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop (Cat. No.98TH8468).

[5]  Peter M. W. Gill,et al.  Efficient calculation of p-values in linear-statistic permutation significance tests , 2007 .

[6]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Hippocampal shape analysis using medial surfaces , 2005, NeuroImage.

[7]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Detection and analysis of statistical differences in anatomical shape , 2005, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  Kernel PCA and De-Noising in Feature Spaces , 1998, NIPS.

[9]  Howard Chertkow,et al.  Regional magnetization transfer ratio changes in mild cognitive impairment , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Estimating the Support of a High-Dimensional Distribution , 2001, Neural Computation.

[11]  M. Bobinski,et al.  Frequency of hippocampal formation atrophy in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease , 1997, Neurobiology of Aging.

[12]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  Kernel Fisher discriminant for shape-based classification in epilepsy , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Discriminative Analysis for Image-Based Studies , 2002, MICCAI.

[14]  Martin Styner,et al.  Shape versus Size: Improved Understanding of the Morphology of Brain Structures , 2001, MICCAI.

[15]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  Kernel PCA pattern reconstruction via approximate pre-images. , 1998 .

[16]  Kaarin J Anstey,et al.  Sex and symmetry differences in hippocampal volumetrics: Before and beyond the opening of the crus of the fornix , 2006, Hippocampus.

[17]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Elastic model-based segmentation of 3-D neuroradiological data sets , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An introduction to Support Vector Machines , 2000 .

[19]  Martin Styner,et al.  Boundary and Medial Shape Analysis of the Hippocampus in Schizophrenia , 2003, MICCAI.

[20]  Vicki Bruce,et al.  Face Recognition: From Theory to Applications , 1999 .

[21]  Nick Barnes,et al.  A Study of Hippocampal Shape Difference Between Genders by Efficient Hypothesis Test and Discriminative Deformation , 2007, MICCAI.

[22]  Ivor W. Tsang,et al.  The pre-image problem in kernel methods , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[23]  Allen Tannenbaum,et al.  Statistical shape analysis using kernel PCA , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[24]  Douglas W. Jones,et al.  Shape analysis of brain ventricles using SPHARM , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA 2001).

[25]  Polina Golland,et al.  Discriminative Direction for Kernel Classifiers , 2001, NIPS.

[26]  A. Toga,et al.  Hippocampal Atrophy in Persons With Age-Associated Memory Impairment: Volumetry Within a Common Space , 2002, Psychosomatic medicine.

[27]  Fillia Makedon,et al.  Hippocampal shape analysis: surface-based representation and classification , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[28]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern classification, 2nd Edition , 2000 .