ARE MENDEL'S RESULTS REALLY TOO CLOSE?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] T. Dobzhansky. Looking Back at Mendel's Discovery. (Book Reviews: Fundamenta Genetica. The Revised Edition of Mendel's Classic Paper with a Collection of 27 Original Papers Published during the Rediscovery Era; Iconographia Mendeliana) , 1967 .
[2] E. S. Pearson,et al. A note on the background to, and refereeing of, R. A. Fisher’s 1918 paper ‘On the correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance’ , 1976, Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London.
[3] G. Bryan. Average Number of Kinsfolk in Each Degree , 1904, Nature.
[4] Mendel, Darwin, and Fisher (1865-1965) , 1964 .
[5] V. Orel. Will the Story on “too good” Results of Mendel's Data Continue? , 1968 .
[6] Ira Pligrim. The too-good-to-be-true paradox and Gregor Mendel. , 1984 .
[7] The questions of fit in the gregor mendel controversy , 1983 .
[8] Rory A. Fisher,et al. Has Mendel's work been rediscovered? , 1936 .
[9] R S Root-Bernstein. Mendel and Methodology , 1983, History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching.
[10] F. Weiling. What about R.A. Fisher's statement of the "too good" data of J.G. Mendel's Pisum paper? , 1986, The Journal of heredity.
[11] W. F. Weldon,et al. MENDEL'S LAWS OF ALTERNATIVE INHERITANCE IN PEAS , 1902 .