Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images.

[1]  Jeremy Bentham,et al.  Rationale of judicial evidence , 1978 .

[2]  R. Yeo,et al.  The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method , 1986 .

[3]  A. Levin.  "Toxic torts". , 1987, Science.

[4]  C. Bazerman.  Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice , 1989 .

[5]  William Twining,et al.  Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays , 1990 .

[6]  B. Asher.  The Professional Vision , 1994 .

[7]  Kanti V. Mardia,et al.  On statistical problems with face identification from photographs. , 1996 .

[8]  J. Matthews.  Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life , 1996 .

[9]  M. Berger.  Eliminating general causation: Notes towards a new theory of justice and toxic torts , 1997 .

[10]  G. Pike,et al.  When Seeing should not be Believing: Photographs, Credit Cards and Fraud , 1997 .

[11]  Brian Leiter,et al.  The Epistemology of Admissibility: Why Even Good Philosophy of Science Would Not Make for Good Philosophy of Evidence , 1997 .

[12]  Michael Lynch.  The production of scientific images : Vision and re-vision in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science , 1998 .

[13]  V. Bruce,et al.  Face Recognition in Poor-Quality Video: Evidence From Security Surveillance , 1999 .

[14]  T. Gieryn.  Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line , 1999 .

[15]  D. Risinger.  Navigating Expert Reliability: are Criminal Standards of Certainty Being Left on the Dock? , 2000 .

[16]  S. Turner.  What is the Problem with Experts? , 2001 .

[17]  Susan Haack,et al.  An Epistemologist in the Bramble-Bush: At the Supreme Court with Mr. Joiner , 2001, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[18]  David Mercer,et al.  Conjectures and Exhumations: Citations of History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science in US Federal Courts , 2002 .

[19]  S. Penrod,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF DAUBERT ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY IN STATE AND FEDERAL CRIMINAL CASES , 2002 .

[20]  William C. Thompson,et al.  The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion , 2002 .

[21]  John H. Langbein.  The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial , 2003 .

[22]  A. Schwartz.  A "DOGMA OF EMPIRICISM" REVISITED: , 2003 .

[23]  S. Jasanoff.  States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order , 2004 .

[24]  G. Edmond,et al.  Daubert and the Exclusionary Ethos: The Convergence of Corporate and Judicial Attitudes Towards the Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Tort Litigation , 2004 .

[25]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Law's knowledge: science for justice in legal settings. , 2005, American journal of public health.

[26]  J. Koehler,et al.  The Coming Paradigm Shift in Forensic Identification Science , 2005, Science.

[27]  M. Lynch,et al.  Science and Technology Studies on Trial: , 2005 .

[28]  I. Dror,et al.  Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[29]  R. Drechsel.  Distorting the Law: Politics, Media, and the Litigation Crisis , 2006 .

[30]  D. Lyon.  Surveillance Studies: An Overview , 2007 .

[31]  Glenn Porter.  Visual culture in forensic science , 2007 .

[32]  Ruth Costigan.  ‘Identification from CCTV: the Risk of Injustice’ , 2007 .

[33]  Keith Findley.  Innocents at Risk: Adversary Imbalance, Forensic Science, and the Search for Truth , 2008 .

[34]  Michael J. Saks,et al.  Communicating opinion evidence in the forensic identification sciences: Accuracy and impact , 2008 .

[35]  Déirdre M. Dwyer.  The Judicial Assessment of Expert Evidence , 2008 .

[36]  H. L. Ho.  A Philosophy of Evidence Law: Justice in the Search for Truth , 2008 .

[37]  David L. Faigman,et al.  Failed Forensics: How Forensic Science Lost Its Way and How it Might Yet Find it , 2008 .

[38]  G. Edmond.  Pathological Science? Demonstrable Reliability and Expert Forensic Pathology Evidence , 2008 .

[39]  Mike Redmayne.  :Truth, Error, and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology , 2008 .

[40]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Are facial image analysis experts any better than the general public at identifying individuals from CCTV images? , 2009, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[41]  S. Cole.  A Cautionary Tale About Cautionary Tales About Intervention , 2009 .

[42]  Ann C. Smith,et al.  Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals , 2009 .

[43]  Neal Feigenson,et al.  Law on Display: The Digital Transformation of Legal Persuasion and Judgment , 2009 .

[44]  Stephen Goudge.  Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine Oration: The Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario, Canada: some reflections , 2009 .

[45]  Tim Valentine,et al.  CCTV on trial: Matching video images with the defendant in the dock , 2009 .

[46]  Louis Georges Schwartz.  Mechanical Witness: A History of Motion Picture Evidence in U.S. Courts , 2009 .

[47]  Law. Policy.  Executive Summary of the National Academies of Science Reports, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward , 2009 .

[48]  I. Dror,et al.  The vision in “blind” justice: Expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  Martin Evison,et al.  Computer-aided forensic facial comparison , 2010 .

[50]  R. Kemp,et al.  Atkins v The Emperor: The ‘Cautious’ Use of Unreliable ‘Expert’ Opinion , 2010 .

[51]  Jennifer L. Mnookin,et al.  The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences , 2011 .

[52]  G. Edmond,et al.  A Contextual Approach to the Admissibility of the State's Forensic Science and Medical Evidence , 2011 .

[53]  Brandon L. Garrett.  Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong , 2011 .

[54]  Glenn Porter.  A New Theoretical Framework regarding the Application and Reliability of Photographic Evidence , 2011 .

[55]  G. Edmond,et al.  Procedural fairness, the criminal trial and forensic science and medicine , 2011 .

[56]  C. Aitken,et al.  Expressing evaluative opinions: a position statement , 2011 .

[57]  G. Edmond.  Is Reliability Sufficient? The Law Commission and Expert Evidence in International and Interdisciplinary Perspective (Part 1) , 2012 .

[58]  G. Edmond,et al.  The Cool Crucible: Forensic Science and the Frailty of the Criminal Trial , 2012 .

[59]  S. Cole.  Forensic culture as epistemic culture: the sociology of forensic science. , 2013, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[60]  J. Toro.  Never Pure: Historical Studies of Science as if It was Produced by People with Bodies, Situated in Time, Space, Culture, and Society, and Struggling for Credibility and Authority , 2013 .

[61]  Anya P. Foxen,et al.  Mythologies , 2022, Is This Yoga?.