Development of the nonverbal immediacy scale (NIS): Measures of self‐and other‐perceived nonverbal immediacy

In recent years nonverbal immediacy has received considerable attention from researchers concerned with instructional communication, interpersonal communication, and organizational communication. Unfortunately, the instruments used to measure nonverbal immediacy in these contexts sometimes have been problematic in terms of their reliability estimates. This research attempted to overcome this problem, or failing that, to identify the cause(s) of the reduced reliability. The research resulted in a scale with high reliability when used as either a self‐report or an other‐report measure. It was also found to be equally reliable across the contexts of instructional, interpersonal, and organizational communication. Content validity of the scale is good and an initial test of predictive validity produced a high validity correlation. Unexpected sex differences were observed in the results and these are discussed in this report.

[1]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  Immediacy: an indicator of attitudes in linguistic communication. , 1966, Journal of personality.

[2]  A. Mehrabian Silent Messages: Implicit Communication of Emotions and Attitudes , 1971 .

[3]  E. Berscheid Silent Messages: Implicit Communication of Emotions and Attitudes. 2nd ed , 1981 .

[4]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Relational Messages Associated with Nonverbal Behaviors. , 1984 .

[5]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  The Relationship Between Selected Immediacy Behaviors and Cognitive Learning , 1987 .

[6]  J. Gorham The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning , 1988 .

[7]  T. Levine,et al.  Measuring trait communication apprehension: A test of rival measurement models of the PRCA‐24 , 1990 .

[8]  Joan M. Fayer,et al.  A cross‐cultural and multi‐behavioral analysis of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and teacher evaluation , 1995 .

[9]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Fundamentals of Human Communication: An Interpersonal Perspective , 1995 .

[10]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Validity of the verbal immediacy scale , 1995 .

[11]  C. Heckler A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS™ System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1996 .

[12]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The interrelationship of student ratings of instructors' immediacy, verbal aggressiveness, homophily, and interpersonal attraction , 1999 .

[13]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The impact of supervisor and subordinate immediacy on relational and organizational outcomes , 2000 .

[14]  Jon A. Hess,et al.  Is teacher immediacy actually related to student cognitive learning? , 2001 .