Road safety: the average male as a norm in vehicle occupant crash safety assessment

ABSTRACT This review addresses how women and men are represented in regulatory tests conducted to assess adult occupant safety in vehicles. Injury statistics show that protection in the event of a crash is lower for females than males. Still, vehicle crash safety assessment for adult occupants is only using the average sized male to represent the entire adult population, while the average sized female is not represented. In order to enable car manufacturers and road safety regulators to safeguard that females benefit equally from crash safety measures as males, it is necessary to develop new dedicated occupant models. These new models must represent the female part of the population, i.e. crash test dummies and human body models representing the average female. New female models would, together with their male equivalents, make it possible to identify the vehicle occupant safety systems which provide the best safety features for both females and males.

[1]  Raj D. Rao,et al.  The Influence of Morphology on Cervical Injury Characteristics , 2011, Spine.

[2]  A. Peolsson,et al.  Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for isometric neck strength. , 2001, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[3]  Pete Thomas,et al.  Neck injuries in the UK co-operative crash injury study , 1996 .

[4]  Mats Y. Svensson,et al.  Seat testing to investigate the female neck injury risk-preliminary results using a new female dummy prototype , 2012 .

[5]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  The Effect of Whiplash Protection Systems in Real-Life Crashes and their Correlation to Consumer Crash Test Programmes , 2007 .

[6]  K. Brolin,et al.  Dynamic Cervical Vertebral Motion of Female and Male Volunteers and Analysis of its Interaction with Head/Neck/Torso Behavior during Low‐Speed Rear Impact , 2014 .

[7]  J. Temming,et al.  Frequency and risk of cervical spine distortion injuries in passenger car accidents: significance of human factors data , 1998 .

[8]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  COMBINING CRASH RECORDER AND PAIRED COMPARISON TECHNIQUE: INJURY RISK FUNCTIONS IN FRONTAL AND REAR IMPACTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO NECK INJURIES , 2003 .

[9]  G. Viel,et al.  Whiplash-associated disorders from a physical therapy and health-economic perspective , 2006 .

[10]  J. Davidsson,et al.  Dynamic Kinematic Responses of Female Volunteers in Rear Impacts and Comparison to Previous Male Volunteer Tests , 2011, Traffic injury prevention.

[11]  S Kumar,et al.  Cervical strength of young adults in sagittal, coronal, and intermediate planes. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  M. Prange,et al.  Flexion and extension structural properties and strengths for male cervical spine segments. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Mark D. Brown,et al.  Intraoperative Measurement of Lumbar Spine Motion Segment Stiffness , 2002, Spine.

[14]  L. Frostholm,et al.  Are there gender differences in coping with neck pain following acute whiplash trauma? A 12‐month follow‐up study , 2012, European journal of pain.

[15]  Robert D. Anderson,et al.  Human Occupant Kinematic Response to Low Speed Rear-End Impacts , 1994 .

[16]  J. Crandall,et al.  Vulnerability of female drivers involved in motor vehicle crashes: an analysis of US population at risk. , 2011, American journal of public health.

[17]  J B Welcher,et al.  Relationships between seat properties and human subject kinematics in rear impact tests. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Nicholas A. Vavalle.  Validation of the Global Human Body Models Consortium Mid-Sized Male Model in Lateral Impacts and Sled Tests , 2012 .

[19]  Yuko Nakahira,et al.  Development and Validation of the Total HUman Model for Safety (THUMS) Version 5 Containing Multiple 1D Muscles for Estimating Occupant Motions with Muscle Activation During Side Impacts. , 2015, Stapp car crash journal.

[20]  M. Svensson,et al.  Parameters Influencing AIS 1 Neck Injury Outcome in Frontal Impacts , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[21]  Masami Iwamoto,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A FINITE ELEMENT MODEL OF THE TOTAL HUMAN MODEL FOR SAFETY (THUMS) AND APPLICATION TO INJURY RECONSTRUCTION , 2002 .

[22]  Mike W. J. Arun,et al.  Influence of morphological variations on cervical spine segmental responses from inertial loading , 2018, Traffic injury prevention.

[23]  Dolinis.  Risk factors for 'whiplash' in drivers: a cohort study of rear-end traffic crashes. , 1997, Injury.

[24]  G. Siegmund,et al.  Motion of the Head and Neck of Female and Male Volunteers in Rear Impact Car-to-Car Impacts , 2012, Traffic injury prevention.

[25]  K. Schmitt,et al.  ADSEAT--Adaptive Seat to Reduce Neck Injuries for Female and Male Occupants. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  G. Siegmund,et al.  Dynamic Responses of Female and Male Volunteers in Rear Impacts , 2008, Traffic injury prevention.

[27]  Trent Victor,et al.  When Autonomous Vehicles Are Introduced on a Larger Scale in the Road Transport System: The Drive Me Project , 2017 .

[28]  Arthur C. Croft,et al.  Differential occupant kinematics and forces between frontal and rear automobile impacts at low speed: evidence for a differential injury risk. , 2002 .

[29]  Jacobo Antona Makoshi,et al.  Investigation of whole spine alignment patterns in automotive seated posture using upright open MRI systems , 2016 .

[30]  Mats Y. Svensson,et al.  Characteristics of Dynamic Cervical Vertebral Kinematics for Female and Male Volunteers in Low-speed Rear Impact, based on Quasi-static Neck Kinematics , 2015 .

[31]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  Development of whiplash associated disorders for male and female car occupants in cars launched since the 80s in different impact directions , 2013 .

[32]  Å. Nygren.  Injuries to car occupants--some aspects of the interior safety of cars. A study of a five-year material from an insurance company. , 1984, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[33]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments , 2010, Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine.

[34]  A. B. Kelley,et al.  Automobile head restraints--frequency of neck injury claims in relation to the presence of head restraints. , 1972, American journal of public health.

[35]  Arno Eichberger,et al.  COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CAR SEATS REGARDING HEAD-NECK KINEMATICS OF VOLUNTEERS DURING REAR END IMPACT , 1997 .

[36]  Michiel van Ratingen,et al.  The European New Car Assessment Programme , 2014 .

[37]  D. Viano.  Seat Influences on Female Neck Responses in Rear Crashes: A Reason Why Women Have Higher Whiplash Rates , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[38]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  Gender analysis on whiplash seat effectiveness: Results from real-world crashes , 2010 .

[39]  M. Svensson,et al.  Transient pressure changes in the vertebral canal during whiplash motion--A hydrodynamic modeling approach. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  R. Newman,et al.  Soft tissue cervical spinal injuries in motor vehicle accidents. , 1989, Injury.

[41]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  The Risk of Whiplash Injury in the Rear Seat Compared to the Front Seat in Rear Impacts , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[42]  J. Mehlsen,et al.  Maximal isometric strength of the cervical musculature in 100 healthy volunteers. , 1999, Spine.

[43]  J. Kihlberg.  Flexion-torsion neck injury in rear impacts , 1969 .

[44]  J. Mordaka,et al.  The Biomechanics of Gender Difference and Whiplash Injury: Designing Safer Car Seats for Women , 2003 .

[45]  F. S. Gayzik,et al.  Development of a Full Body CAD Dataset for Computational Modeling: A Multi-modality Approach , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[46]  Fusako Sato,et al.  Effects of whole spine alignment patterns on neck responses in rear end impact , 2017, Traffic injury prevention.

[47]  D. H. Robbins,et al.  Development of anthropometrically based design specifications for an advanced adult anthropomorphic dummy family, volume 1 , 1983 .

[48]  Terry A. Smith,et al.  Head/neck kinematic response of human subjects in low-speed rear-end collisions , 1997 .

[49]  Felix H. Walz,et al.  Consequences for seat design due to rear end accident analysis, sled tests and possible test criteria for reducing cervical spine injuries after rear-end collision , 1999 .

[50]  C. E. Clauser,et al.  Anthropometric Relationships of Body and Body Segment Moments of Inertia , 1980 .

[51]  Janella F. Chapline,et al.  Neck pain and head restraint position relative to the driver's head in rear-end collisions. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[52]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  Anthropometric Specifications, Development, and Evaluation of EvaRID—A 50th Percentile Female Rear Impact Finite Element Dummy Model , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[53]  K. Brolin,et al.  A female head-neck model for rear impact simulations. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[54]  S. Ejima,et al.  Prediction of Neck Injury Risk Based on the Analysis of Localized Cervical Vertebral Motion of Human Volunteers during Low-speed Rear Impacts , 2006 .

[55]  Steven G. Storvik,et al.  Population-based estimates of whiplash injury using nass cds data - biomed 2009. , 2009, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[56]  M. Richter,et al.  Whiplash-type neck distortion in restrained car drivers: frequency, causes and long-term results , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[57]  A. Hedley,et al.  Maximal isometric muscle strength of the cervical spine in healthy volunteers , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[58]  S. Delp,et al.  Three-Dimensional Isometric Strength of Neck Muscles in Humans , 2001, Spine.

[59]  D. Medina,et al.  Normative database of isometric cervical strength in a healthy population. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[60]  Mats Y. Svensson,et al.  BIORID I: A NEW BIOFIDELIC REAR IMPACT DUMMY , 1998 .