Advances in ballistic penetrating impact simulations on thin structures using Smooth Particles Hydrodynamics: A state of the art

Abstract Experimental tests, analytical modeling, empirical or semi-empirical fit, and numerical simulation, are different concepts and ways to study the complex mechanism of High-Velocity Impact (HVI). Mainly studied in the framework of the improvement of high strength material, the understanding of this physical process can help to optimize the structures submitted to HVI problems. Aerospatial or aeronautic lightweight structures, body-armor or armor plates devices, and others should be investigated, taking into account the high-velocity impact loading in terms of ability to stop projectiles, in terms of mass optimization, in terms of reduction of injury appearance for the human body. At a numerical level, lots of approaches like finite element method, finite difference method, or particle methods have been developed, allowing modeling and predicting the behavior of a structure impacted by a projectile. Focusing on the last one, the Smooth Particles Hydrodynamics (SPH) method as the earliest meshless method has been widely developed in the last decades. The characteristic of particle modeling in the SPH method can avoid the typical weakness (mesh distortion) of the mesh-based method, and make it naturally suitable for the large deformation problems. It can be found in the literature that the SPH method has been widely applied to model the behavior of a mechanical structure, especially concentrating on thin-plate structures. This paper attempts to make a state of the art for recent advances concerning the perforation of thin plates in the context of ballistic impacts using SPH analysis.

[1]  Andrea Colagrossi,et al.  A simple procedure to improve the pressure evaluation in hydrodynamic context using the SPH , 2009, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[2]  S. A. Medin,et al.  Improvements in SPH method by means of interparticle contact algorithm and analysis of perforation tests at moderate projectile velocities , 2000 .

[3]  N. V. David,et al.  Ballistic Resistant Body Armor: Contemporary and Prospective Materials and Related Protection Mechanisms , 2009 .

[4]  Yihua Xiao,et al.  Studying normal perforation of monolithic and layered steel targets by conical projectiles with SPH simulation and analytical method , 2017 .

[5]  C. A. Wingate,et al.  Impact modeling with smooth particle hydrodynamics , 1992 .

[6]  R. D. Richtmyer,et al.  A Method for the Numerical Calculation of Hydrodynamic Shocks , 1950 .

[7]  D. Medina,et al.  Three-dimensional simulations of impact induced damage in composite structures using the parallelized SPH method , 2000 .

[8]  Guirong Liu,et al.  Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH): an Overview and Recent Developments , 2010 .

[9]  Somsak Swaddiwudhipong,et al.  Perforation of steel and aluminum targets using a modified Johnson–Cook material model , 2012 .

[10]  Bülent Ekici,et al.  Ballistic resistance of high hardness armor steels against 7.62 mm armor piercing ammunition , 2013 .

[11]  Konrad Wegener,et al.  Meshless Methods for Large Deformation Elastodynamics , 2018, ArXiv.

[12]  Anna Bogdan,et al.  Aspects of Applying Ergonomic Tests in the Evaluation of Ballistic Body Armours Using the Example of Ballistic Vests , 2012 .

[13]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Stability Analysis of Particle Methods with Corrected Derivatives , 2002 .

[14]  Martin W. Heinstein,et al.  An analysis of smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 1994 .

[15]  Juan R. Reveles Development of a total Lagrangian SPH code for the simulation of solids under dynamic loading , 2007 .

[16]  Javid Bayandor,et al.  On the Fluidic Response of Structures in Hypervelocity Impacts , 2015 .

[17]  Larry D. Libersky,et al.  Smooth particle hydrodynamics with strength of materials , 1991 .

[18]  L. Libersky,et al.  Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: Some recent improvements and applications , 1996 .

[19]  C. A. Wingate,et al.  Models of high velocity impact phenomena , 1992 .

[20]  S. Miyama,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Viscous Flow by Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics , 1994 .

[21]  Xiong Zhang,et al.  Comparison study of MPM and SPH in modeling hypervelocity impact problems , 2009 .

[22]  Sukanta Chakraborty,et al.  Prognosis for ballistic sensitivity of pre-notch in metallic beam through mesh-less computation reflecting material damage , 2015 .

[23]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Stable particle methods based on Lagrangian kernels , 2004 .

[24]  Romesh C. Batra,et al.  Analysis of adiabatic shear bands in elasto-thermo-viscoplastic materials by modified smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (MSPH) method , 2004 .

[25]  Shu-ichiro Inutsuka Reformulation of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics with Riemann Solver , 2002 .

[26]  Robert A. Dalrymple,et al.  SPH on GPU with CUDA , 2010 .

[27]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Meshfree and particle methods and their applications , 2002 .

[28]  J. Dear,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of high velocity soft impact loading on aircraft materials , 2019, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[29]  J. K. Chen,et al.  A corrective smoothed particle method for boundary value problems in heat conduction , 1999 .

[30]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars , 1977 .

[31]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  NORMALIZED SMOOTHING FUNCTIONS FOR SPH IMPACT COMPUTATIONS , 1996 .

[32]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Conversion of 3D distorted elements into meshless particles during dynamic deformation , 2003 .

[33]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Incorporation of an SPH option into the EPIC code for a wide range of high velocity impact computations , 1993 .

[34]  T. Ye,et al.  A Comparative Review of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics, Dissipative Particle Dynamics and Smoothed Dissipative Particle Dynamics , 2018, International Journal of Computational Methods.

[35]  Mark A Fleming,et al.  Meshless methods: An overview and recent developments , 1996 .

[36]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Shock simulation by the particle method SPH , 1983 .

[37]  Yihua Xiao,et al.  On the Simulation of Fragmentation During the Process of Ceramic Tile Impacted by Blunt Projectile with SPH Method in LS-DYNA , 2020 .

[38]  S. Long,et al.  SIMULATION OF NORMAL PERFORATION OF ALUMINUM PLATES USING AXISYMMETRIC SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS WITH CONTACT ALGORITHM , 2013 .

[39]  Hongwei Liu,et al.  Cavity dynamics and drag force of high-speed penetration of rigid spheres into 10wt% gelatin , 2012 .

[40]  Georg C. Ganzenmüller,et al.  An hourglass control algorithm for Lagrangian Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics , 2015 .

[41]  M. B. Liu,et al.  A New Formula for Predicting the Crater Size of a Target Plate Produced by Hypervelocity Impact , 2017, International Journal of Computational Methods.

[42]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Artificial viscosity effects for SPH impact computations , 1996 .

[43]  Tore Børvik,et al.  An Experimental Set-up Used In BallisticPenetration , 1970 .

[44]  D. Agard,et al.  Microtubule nucleation by γ-tubulin complexes , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[45]  G. Dilts MOVING-LEAST-SQUARES-PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS-I. CONSISTENCY AND STABILITY , 1999 .

[46]  J. K. Chen,et al.  An improvement for tensile instability in smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 1999 .

[47]  Andrew J. Piekutowski,et al.  Characteristics of debris clouds produced by hypervelocity impact of aluminum spheres with thin aluminum plates , 1993 .

[48]  C. Bir,et al.  SPH-based method to simulate penetrating impact mechanics into ballistic gelatin: Toward an understanding of the perforation of human tissue , 2019, Extreme Mechanics Letters.

[49]  Rushdie Ibne Islam,et al.  A computational model for failure of ductile material under impact , 2017 .

[50]  Jean-Paul Vila,et al.  ON PARTICLE WEIGHTED METHODS AND SMOOTH PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS , 1999 .

[51]  Werner Goldsmith,et al.  The mechanics of penetration of projectiles into targets , 1978 .

[52]  David Palmieri,et al.  SPH simulations of debris impacts using two different computer codes , 1999 .

[53]  I. Kozlov,et al.  Development of modified SPH approach for modeling of high-velocity impact , 2012 .

[54]  Eric A. Machorro,et al.  Modeling Plastic Deformation of Steel Plates in Hypervelocity Impact Experiments , 2015 .

[55]  J. Monaghan On the problem of penetration in particle methods , 1989 .

[56]  S. A. Medin,et al.  Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Using Interparticle Contact Algorithms , 2002 .

[57]  M. Langseth,et al.  Ballistic penetration of steel plates , 1999 .

[58]  Joseph J Monaghan,et al.  An introduction to SPH , 1987 .

[59]  P. Groenenboom,et al.  Numerical simulation of 2D and 3D hypervelocity impact using the SPH option in PAM-SHOCK™ , 1997 .

[60]  L. Libersky,et al.  High strain Lagrangian hydrodynamics: a three-dimensional SPH code for dynamic material response , 1993 .

[61]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  An improved computational constitutive model for brittle materials , 2008 .

[62]  Gary A. Dilts,et al.  Moving least‐squares particle hydrodynamics II: conservation and boundaries , 2000 .

[63]  Dingguo Zhang,et al.  Effect of arbitrary yaw/pitch angle in bird strike numerical simulation using SPH method , 2018, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[64]  K. Ogi,et al.  Characterization of high-velocity impact damage in CFRP laminates: Part I – Experiment , 2013 .

[65]  Tae-won Kim,et al.  Determination of impact fragments from particle analysis via smoothed particle hydrodynamics and k-means clustering , 2019 .

[66]  Moubin Liu,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics with kernel gradient correction for modeling high velocity impact in two- and three-dimensional spaces , 2017 .

[67]  Chong Peng,et al.  A Total Lagrangian SPH Method for Modelling Damage and Failure in Solids , 2019, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences.

[68]  A. Arias,et al.  Numerical simulations of impact behaviour of thin steel plates subjected to cylindrical, conical and hemispherical non-deformable projectiles , 2008 .

[69]  Eric A. Machorro,et al.  Study of hypervelocity projectile impact on thick metal plates , 2016 .

[70]  Vishal Mehra,et al.  Tensile Instability and Artificial Stresses in Impact Problems in SPH , 2012 .

[71]  G. Lavalle,et al.  A numerical reduced model for thin liquid films sheared by a gas flow , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[72]  J. Monaghan,et al.  SPH elastic dynamics , 2001 .

[73]  J. Monaghan SPH without a Tensile Instability , 2000 .

[74]  C. Hayhurst,et al.  Cylindrically symmetric SPH simulations of hypervelocity impacts on thin plates , 1997 .

[75]  A. Munjiza The Combined Finite-Discrete Element Method , 2004 .

[76]  H. Sekine,et al.  Numerical simulation of hypervelocity impacts of a projectile on laminated composite plate targets by means of improved SPH method , 2004 .

[77]  Hai Huang,et al.  Fragment Identification and Statistics Method of Hypervelocity Impact SPH Simulation , 2011 .

[78]  V. Silberschmidt,et al.  SPH-FEM simulation of shaped-charge jet penetration into double hull: A comparison study for steel and SPS , 2016 .

[79]  S. Roth,et al.  3D smooth particle hydrodynamics modeling for high velocity penetrating impact using GPU: Application to a blunt projectile penetrating thin steel plates , 2019 .

[80]  Jae Hoon Lee,et al.  Application of an improved contact algorithm for penetration analysis in SPH , 2008 .

[81]  S. Bobashev,et al.  Hypervelocity impact of mm-size plastic projectile on thin aluminum plate , 2017 .

[82]  Moubin Liu,et al.  A finite particle method with particle shifting technique for modeling particulate flows with thermal convection , 2019, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer.

[83]  Rade Vignjevic,et al.  A contact algorithm for smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2000 .

[84]  Larry D. Libersky,et al.  Cylindrical smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 1993 .

[85]  Shu-ichiro Inutsuka,et al.  An extension of Godunov SPH II , 2016 .

[86]  Alexis Rusinek,et al.  Perforation mechanics of 2024 aluminium protective plates subjected to impact by different nose shapes of projectiles , 2018 .

[87]  Rade Vignjevic,et al.  Coupling between meshless and finite element methods , 2005 .

[88]  S. Attaway,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics stability analysis , 1995 .

[89]  N. Miloradović,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of perforation of thin steel plates by deformable steel penetrators , 2016 .

[90]  J. Monaghan Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics and Its Diverse Applications , 2012 .

[91]  Vishal Mehra,et al.  High velocity impact of metal sphere on thin metallic plates: A comparative smooth particle hydrodynamics study , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[92]  Hongfu Qiang,et al.  Coupling of smoothed particle hydrodynamics and finite element method for impact dynamics simulation , 2011 .

[93]  Christine Espinosa,et al.  Hypervelocity impacts on thin brittle targets: Experimental data and SPH simulations , 2006 .

[94]  Moubin Liu,et al.  Predicting the damage on a target plate produced by hypervelocity impact using a decoupled finite particle method , 2019, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements.

[95]  P M Campbell,et al.  Some New Algorithms for Boundary Value Problems in Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics , 1989 .

[96]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  SPH for high velocity impact computations , 1996 .

[97]  D. Balsara von Neumann stability analysis of smoothed particle hydrodynamics—suggestions for optimal algorithms , 1995 .

[98]  M. Giglio,et al.  FE coupled to SPH numerical model for the simulation of high-velocity impact on ceramic based ballistic shields , 2020 .

[99]  Gui-Rong Liu,et al.  Restoring particle consistency in smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2006 .

[100]  Cheng Xu,et al.  Back-Spalling process of an Al2O3 ceramic plate subjected to an impact of steel ball , 2018, International Journal of Impact Engineering.

[101]  S. Swaddiwudhipong,et al.  High Velocity Penetration/Perforation Using Coupled Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics-Finite Element Method , 2010, ArXiv.

[102]  Shu-ichiro Inutsuka,et al.  An extension of Godunov SPH II: Application to elastic dynamics , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[103]  J. Limido,et al.  An Accurate SPH Scheme for Dynamic Fragmentation modelling , 2018 .

[104]  Hui Li,et al.  An improved SPH method for modeling liquid sloshing dynamics , 2012 .

[105]  Theodore C. Carney,et al.  High-velocity impact of graphite/epoxy composite laminates , 1997 .

[106]  Marco Giglio,et al.  An experimental–numerical investigation on aluminium tubes subjected to ballistic impact with soft core 7.62 ball projectiles , 2013 .

[107]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Dynamic Lagrangian computations for solids, with variable nodal connectivity for severe distortions , 1986 .

[108]  Youchao Sun,et al.  Bird-striking damage of rotating laminates using SPH-CDM method , 2019, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[109]  S. Roth,et al.  SPH modeling of high velocity impact into ballistic gelatin. Development of an axis-symmetrical formulation , 2019 .

[110]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Linking of Lagrangian particle methods to standard finite element methods for high velocity impact computations , 1994 .

[111]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A unified stability analysis of meshless particle methods , 2000 .

[112]  Sukanta Chakraborty,et al.  Crack Propagation in Bi-Material System via Pseudo-Spring Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics , 2014 .

[113]  T. Rabczuk,et al.  High velocity impact of metal sphere on thin metallic plate using smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method , 2012 .

[114]  J. Sherburn,et al.  A comparison of finite element analysis to smooth particle hydrodynamics for application to projectile impact on cementitious material , 2016 .

[115]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  A Combined Particle-element Method for High-velocity Impact Computations☆ , 2013 .

[116]  T. Børvik,et al.  A computational model of viscoplasticity and ductile damage for impact and penetration , 2001 .

[117]  Stephen R Reid,et al.  Heuristic acceleration correction algorithm for use in SPH computations in impact mechanics , 2009 .

[118]  J. Monaghan,et al.  A Switch to Reduce SPH Viscosity , 1997 .

[119]  L. Lucy A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. , 1977 .

[120]  K. Ogi,et al.  Characterization of high-velocity impact damage in CFRP laminates: Part II – prediction by smoothed particle hydrodynamics☆ , 2014 .

[121]  Gabi Ben-Dor,et al.  Estimation of perforation thickness for concrete shield against high-speed impact , 2010 .

[122]  J. K. Chen,et al.  A generalized smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for nonlinear dynamic problems , 2000 .

[123]  Martin Močilan,et al.  Finite Element Modelling of High Velocity Impact on Plate Structures , 2016 .

[124]  Md Rushdie Ibne Islam,et al.  Pseudo-spring SPH simulations on the perforation of metal targets with different damage models , 2020 .

[125]  Rushdie Ibne Islam,et al.  Ballistic performance of ceramic and ceramic-metal composite plates with JH1, JH2 and JHB material models , 2020 .

[126]  A. G. W. Cameron,et al.  The origin of the moon and the single-impact hypothesis III. , 1991 .

[127]  Larry D. Libersky,et al.  Recent improvements in SPH modeling of hypervelocity impact , 1997 .

[128]  Sukanta Chakraborty,et al.  A pseudo-spring based fracture model for SPH simulation of impact dynamics , 2013 .

[129]  V. Kostopoulos,et al.  Hypervelocity impact response of CFRP laminates using smoothed particle hydrodynamics method: Implementation and validation , 2019, International Journal of Impact Engineering.

[130]  Martin W. Heinstein,et al.  Coupling of smooth particle hydrodynamics with the finite element method , 1994 .

[131]  Yuanming Zhang,et al.  Numerical simulation of chipping formation process with smooth particle hydrodynamic (SPH) method for diamond drilling AIN ceramics , 2018 .

[132]  B. Rogers,et al.  GPUs, a New Tool of Acceleration in CFD: Efficiency and Reliability on Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Methods , 2011, PloS one.

[133]  K. Thoma,et al.  Computational simulation of the hypervelocity impact of al-spheres on thin plates of different materials , 1997 .