Life events and brand preference changes

Three types of variable have been used to explain brand preference changes: consumer characteristics, marketing mix factors and situational influences. The study presented in this paper focuses on the relationship between life events experienced by individuals, resultant stress and lifestyle changes and changes in brand preferences. Based on theory and past research, a model is proposed and tested. The data support the notion that brand preference changes may be viewed as the outcome of adjustments to new life conditions and changes in consumption lifestyles that reflect consumer efforts to cope with stressful life changes. Implications for consumer research are also discussed. Copyright © 2003 Henry Stewart Publications.

[1]  G. Moschis,et al.  A Study of Changes in Brand Preferences , 2001 .

[2]  Anil Mathur,et al.  A study of life events and changes in patronage preferences , 2001 .

[3]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Why Switch? Product Category–Level Explanations for True Variety-Seeking Behavior , 1996 .

[4]  P. Thoits,et al.  Stress, coping, and social support processes: where are we? What next? , 1995, Journal of health and social behavior.

[5]  P. Mergenhagen.  Targeting Transitions: Marketing to Consumers During Life Changes , 1994 .

[6]  C. Dev,et al.  An empirical study of brand switching for a retail service , 1994 .

[7]  J. Deighton,et al.  The Effects of Advertising on Brand Switching and Repeat Purchasing , 1994 .

[8]  Fran H. Norris,et al.  Chronic Stress as a Mediator of Acute Stress: The Case of Hurricane Hugo1 , 1993 .

[9]  M. Caserta,et al.  Bereavement Stress and Coping among Older Adults: Expectations versus the Actual Experience , 1992 .

[10]  C. Schewe,et al.  Role transitions in older adults: A marketing opportunity , 1992 .

[11]  Russell W. Belk,et al.  Artifacts, Identity, and Transition: Favorite Possessions of Indians and Indian Immigrants to the United States , 1991 .

[12]  Randolph E. Bucklin,et al.  Determining Interbrand Substitutability through Survey Measurement of Consumer Preference Structures , 1991 .

[13]  J. McAlexander,et al.  Divorce, the Disposition of the Relationship, and Everything , 1991 .

[14]  T. Novak,et al.  On Comparing Alternative Segmentation Schemes: The List of Values (LOV) and Values and Life Styles (VALS) , 1990 .

[15]  Ronald J. Faber,et al.  Compulsive Buying: A Phenomenological Exploration , 1989 .

[16]  R. Belk.  Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[17]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  A. Andreasen.  Life Status Changes and Changes in Consumer Preferences and Satisfaction , 1984 .

[19]  F. Norris,et al.  Protective function of resources related to life events, global stress, and depression in older adults. , 1984, Journal of health and social behavior.

[20]  Sherman D. Hanna,et al.  The Effectiveness of Family Life Cycle Variables in Consumer Expenditure Research , 1983 .

[21]  R. Lazarus,et al.  Psychological stress and coping in aging. , 1983, The American psychologist.

[22]  M. Tausig.  Measuring Life Events , 1982 .

[23]  M. Lieberman,et al.  The stress process. , 1981, Journal of health and social behavior.

[24]  M. Rutter.  Stress, coping and development: some issues and some questions. , 1981, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[25]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  Introduction to Structural Equation Models. , 1977 .

[26]  Donald G. Morrison,et al.  Testing Brand - Switching Models , 1966 .

[27]  D. G. Morrison,et al.  A Note on Panel Bias , 1966 .