The Concept of Learning in the Strategy Field

This article begins by looking at how the concept of learning has informed our understanding of competitiveness. It then goes on to examine the fresh perspective that the notion of learning opens up on the traditional concerns of corporate strategy, diversification and vertical integration, and on the link between strategy and structure. Next, the association between learning and innovation is discussed. The final part of the review concentrates on the promise that the concept of learning appears to hold as a model for the strategy process itself and the advantages that it offers over more traditional planning and decision making approaches. The article concludes on a cautionary note, warning against the tendency to see learning as inherently virtuous and apolitical, and critically assessing the issues, challenges and implications that still face us in working with the concept in the strategy field, despite its early impact and current promise.

[1]  D. Teece,et al.  Strategic management and economics , 1991 .

[2]  Henry Mintzberg.  Patterns in Strategy Formation , 1978, International Studies of Management & Organization.

[3]  H. Igor Ansoff,et al.  Comment on Henry Mintzberg's rethinking strategic planning , 1994 .

[4]  K. R. Conner.  A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[5]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Strategy as stretch and leverage. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[6]  Nils Brunsson.  THE IRRATIONALITY OF ACTION AND ACTION RATIONALITY: DECISIONS, IDEOLOGIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIONS , 1982 .

[7]  David J. Miller,et al.  Stale in the Saddle: CEO Tenure and the Match Between Organization and Environment , 1991 .

[8]  R. Grant.  The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[9]  H. Ansoff,et al.  Critique of Henry Mintzberg's ‘The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management’ , 1991 .

[10]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[11]  C. Hardy.  Understanding Power: Bringing about Strategic Change , 1996 .

[12]  Fred Kofman,et al.  Communities of commitment: The heart of learning organizations , 1993 .

[13]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[14]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[15]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[16]  G. Stalk,et al.  Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[17]  M. Bolton,et al.  Imitation versus innovation: Lessons to be learned from the Japanese , 1993 .

[18]  Richard A. Bettis,et al.  The business portfolio approach—Where it falls down in practice , 1983 .

[19]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[20]  I. Nonaka.  Creating Organizational Order Out of Chaos: Self-Renewal in Japanese Firms , 1988 .

[21]  G. Johnson.  Managing Strategic Change; The Role of Symbolic Action , 1990 .

[22]  Wheelwright Sc,et al.  The new product development map. , 1989 .

[23]  A. Pettigrew.  Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm , 1987 .

[24]  G. Carroll.  Organizations … The Smaller They Get , 1994 .

[25]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[26]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[27]  M. Dodgson.  Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures , 1993 .

[28]  Thomas J. Peters,et al.  Part One: Get Innovative or Get Dead , 1990 .

[29]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[30]  David Lei,et al.  Global Strategy, Competence-Building and Strategic Alliances , 1992 .

[31]  Alan D. Meyer,et al.  How Ideologies Supplant Formal Structures And Shape Responses To Environments , 1982 .

[32]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[33]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[34]  Henry Mintzberg.  The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management , 1990 .

[35]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[36]  A. Meyer.  What Is Strategy's Distinctive Competence? , 1991 .

[37]  John Child,et al.  THE CONTEXT AND PROCESS OF ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATION ‐ CADBURY LIMITED IN ITS SECTOR , 1987 .

[38]  Peter Hawkins,et al.  Organizational Learning , 1994 .

[39]  Henry Mintzberg.  Learning 1, planning 0 reply to Igor Ansoff , 1991 .

[40]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Why are Americans Such Poor Imitators , 1988 .

[41]  D. Garvin.  Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[42]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Unlearning the organization , 1993 .

[43]  G. Day.  Continuous Learning about Markets , 1994 .

[44]  Alan Sheldon,et al.  Organizational paradigms: A theory of organizational change , 1980 .

[45]  M. Porter.  The Contributions of Industrial Organization To Strategic Management , 1981 .

[46]  T. Kumpe,et al.  Manufacturing: the new case for vertical integration , 1988 .

[47]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  CONGEALING OIL: INVENTING IDEOLOGIES TO JUSTIFY ACTING IDEOLOGIES OUT , 1982 .

[48]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[49]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .