Environmental Risk Regulation and Liability under Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard

This paper analyzes the impact of risk regulation and extended liability on private contracting when production creates an environmental risk on third-parties. We start by deriving the optimal regulation of a buyer-seller (principal-agent) relationship under adverse selection on the seller’s production costs, moral hazard on his safety care and limited liability. This optimal regulation must trade off allocative efficiency against rent extraction in a framework where the firm is rewarded only with moral hazard rent. As a result, the optimal regulation induces some form of complementarity between care and output, even in the absence of any technological interaction. Output distortions are stronger when there is no limit on liability. This optimal regulation can sometimes be implemented with a simple ex post liability rule, provided that the buyer has enough wealth. When liability is extended towards a shallow-pocket buyer, the optimal contract between the buyer and the seller must also avoid any accident to secure gains from trade. Optimal contracts in the extended liability regime are quite comparable with those in the optimal regulation and still exhibit a complementarity between outputs and levels of care even though output distortions are now severe. JEL Classification Nos.: L51, K32, D82.

[1]  J. Laffont,et al.  The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model , 2001 .

[2]  A. Heyes The Law and Economics of the Environment , 2001 .

[3]  G. Dionne,et al.  Environmental risk and extended liability: The case of green technologies , 2003 .

[4]  C. Helm How liable should an exporter be?: The case of trade in hazardous goods , 2005 .

[5]  E. Maskin Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality , 1999 .

[6]  Kurt A. Strasser,et al.  Seeing the Forest for the Trees in CERCLA Liability , 1993 .

[7]  Steven Shavell,et al.  The Judgment Proof Problem , 1986 .

[8]  D. Balkenborg How Liable Should a Lender Be? The Case of Judgment-Proof Firms and Environmental Risk: Comment , 2001 .

[9]  David Martimort,et al.  The benefits of extended liability , 2006 .

[10]  Donatella Porrini,et al.  Law Versus Regulation: A Political Economy Model of Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy , 2000 .

[11]  M. Boyer Environmental Protection, Producer Insolvency and Lender Liability , 1995 .

[12]  Ming-Deh A. Huang,et al.  Proof of proposition 2 , 1992 .

[13]  R. Myerson,et al.  Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs , 1982 .

[14]  Optimal Regulation of Private Production Contracts with Environmental Externalities , 2004 .

[15]  Jean-Jacques Laffont,et al.  Regulation, moral hazard and insurance of environmental risks , 1995 .

[16]  T. Tietenberg,et al.  The structure of penalties in environmental enforcement: An economic analysis , 1992 .

[17]  Daniel E. Ingberman,et al.  The Search for Deep Pockets: Is "Extended Liability" Expensive Liability? , 1997 .

[18]  J. Laffont,et al.  Environmental Risks and Bank Liability. , 1997 .

[19]  R. Pitchford How Liable Should a Lender Be? The Case of Judgment-Proof Firms and Environmental Risk: Comment , 2001 .