Analysis techniques for congruence of the patellofemoral joint.

Quantifying joint congruence may help to understand the relationship between joint function and health. In previous studies, a congruence index (CI) has been used to define subject-specific joint congruence. However, the sensitivity of the CI algorithm to surface representation was unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of applying five modifications (M1-M5) to the CI algorithm to determine whether the magnitude and variability of the patellofemoral CI is dependent on the surface representation used. The five modifications focused on calculating the CI based on the principal curvature (M1) at the centroid of the contact region, (M2) using an root mean square value for the contact region, (M3) using a mean value for the contact region, (M4) using all digitized points of the patellar surface, and (M5) using all digitized points in contact. The CI found using the contact area (M1, M2, M3, and M5) provides a local measure for congruence, which was shown to increase (decreasing CI) with increasing joint angle. In ten healthy subjects measured with magnetic resonance (MR) images, the patellofemoral joint became significantly more congruent as the knee angle increased from 15 deg to 45 deg using method M5. The magnitude and variability of the patellofemoral CI was dependent on the surface representation used, suggesting that standardization of the surface representation is important to provide a consistent measure. Specifically, M5 provides a local measure of joint congruence, which can account for joint position and orientation. M5 balances the ability to detect differences in congruence between knee angles without introducing high variability.

[1]  Alberto Leardini,et al.  Articular contact at the tibiotalar joint in passive flexion. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Vito Starc,et al.  Gender differences in knee kinematics and its possible consequences. , 2005, Croatian medical journal.

[3]  S. Delp,et al.  Patellofemoral joint contact area increases with knee flexion and weight‐bearing , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  The influence of geometry on the stress distribution in joints — a finite element analysis , 1994, Anatomy and Embryology.

[5]  Eugene Ozhinsky,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of patellofemoral kinematics with weight-bearing. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  Gretchen B Salsich,et al.  In Vivo Assessment of Patellofemoral Joint Contact Area in Individuals Who are Pain Free , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  R. H. Deusinger,et al.  Gender Differences in Surface Rolling and Gliding Kinematics of the Knee , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Surface size, curvature analysis, and assessment of knee joint incongruity with MRI in vivo , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  S. N. Baker In-vivo quantification of patellofemoral joint contact force using a mathematical model , 2002 .

[10]  W E Garrett,et al.  A comparison of knee joint motion patterns between men and women in selected athletic tasks. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  Janet L. Ronsky,et al.  Normal and ACL-Deficient in Situ Measurement of Patellofemoral Joint Contact , 2000 .

[12]  J L Ronsky,et al.  Joint surface modeling with thin-plate splines. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  Z A C,et al.  Knee cartilage topography , thickness , and contact areas from MRI : in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements , 1999 .

[14]  D. Kerrigan,et al.  Gender differences in joint biomechanics during walking: normative study in young adults. , 1998, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[15]  V C Mow,et al.  Anatomy of the human patellofemoral joint articular cartilage: Surface curvature analysis , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  H. Yu,et al.  Computational contact analysis of joint congruency. , 1997, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[17]  Janet Lenore Ronsky,et al.  In-vivo quantification of patellofemoral joint contact characteristics , 1994 .

[18]  S. Doucette,et al.  The effect of exercise on patellar tracking in lateral patellar compression syndrome , 1992, The American journal of sports medicine.

[19]  V. Mow,et al.  Curvature characteristics and congruence of the thumb carpometacarpal joint: differences between female and male joints. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  W C Hayes,et al.  Patellofemoral contact pressures. The influence of q-angle and tendofemoral contact. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  L. S. Matthews,et al.  Load bearing characteristics of the patello-femoral joint. , 1977, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[22]  A. C. Merchant,et al.  Roentgenographic analysis of patellofemoral congruence. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.