A fluoroscopy-based planning and guidance software tool for minimally invasive hip refixation by cement injection

PurposeIn orthopaedics, minimally invasive injection of bone cement is an established technique. We present HipRFX, a software tool for planning and guiding a cement injection procedure for stabilizing a loosening hip prosthesis. HipRFX works by analysing a pre-operative CT and intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopic images.MethodsHipRFX simulates the intraoperative fluoroscopic views that a surgeon would see on a display panel. Structures are rendered by modelling their X-ray attenuation. These are then compared to actual fluoroscopic images which allow cement volumes to be estimated. Five human cadaver legs were used to validate the software in conjunction with real percutaneous cement injection into artificially created periprothetic lesions.ResultsBased on intraoperatively obtained fluoroscopic images, our software was able to estimate the cement volume that reached the pre-operatively planned targets. The actual median target lesion volume was 3.58 ml (range 3.17–4.64 ml). The median error in computed cement filling, as a percentage of target volume, was 5.3 % (range 2.2–14.8 %). Cement filling was between 17.6 and 55.4 % (median 51.8 %).ConclusionsAs a proof of concept, HipRFX was capable of simulating intraoperative fluoroscopic C-arm images. Furthermore, it provided estimates of the fraction of injected cement deposited at its intended target location, as opposed to cement that leaked away. This level of knowledge is usually unavailable to the surgeon viewing a fluoroscopic image and may aid in evaluating the success of a percutaneous cement injection intervention.

[1]  Emmanuelle Gouillart,et al.  scikit-image: image processing in Python , 2014, PeerJ.

[2]  Jolanda de Poorter,et al.  Gene therapy and cement injection for the treatment of hip prosthesis loosening in elderly patients , 2010 .

[3]  Edward R. Valstar,et al.  Percutaneous bone cement refixation of aseptically loose hip prostheses: the effect of interface tissue removal on injected cement volumes , 2014, Skeletal Radiology.

[4]  J M Galvin,et al.  The use of digitally reconstructed radiographs for three-dimensional treatment planning and CT-simulation. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  C. Engh,et al.  Can the Volume of Pelvic Osteolysis be Calculated without Using Computed Tomography? , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  G. Hagen,et al.  Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, System Technology, Image Quality, Applications , 2012 .

[7]  Michiel Mulier,et al.  Percutaneous in situ cementation of a loose femoral stem. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  Patricia A. Skundberg,et al.  Principles of Radiographic Imaging: An Art and a Science , 1994 .

[9]  Paul Suetens,et al.  XperGuide: C-arm needle guidance , 2008 .

[10]  S. Agarwal,et al.  Osteolysis—basic science, incidence and diagnosis , 2004 .

[11]  C. Anchan,et al.  CT–guided percutaneous core needle biopsy in deep seated musculoskeletal lesions: a prospective study of 128 cases , 2006, Skeletal Radiology.

[12]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  Comparison of Ho:YAG laser and coblation for interface tissue removal in minimally invasive hip refixation procedures. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  E R Valstar,et al.  On stabilization of loosened hip stems via cement injection into osteolytic cavities. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  Paolo Bifulco,et al.  Estimation of out-of-plane vertebra rotations on radiographic projections using CT data: a simulation study. , 2002, Medical engineering & physics.

[15]  Drazenko Babic,et al.  C-arm cone beam computed tomography needle path overlay for image-guided procedures of the spine and pelvis , 2012, Neuroradiology.

[16]  Peter Kazanzides,et al.  Anatomy-based registration of CT-scan and intraoperative X-ray images for guiding a surgical robot , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Charl P. Botha,et al.  Voxel classification and graph cuts for automated segmentation of pathological periprosthetic hip anatomy , 2012, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[18]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  Computed tomography : fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications , 2000 .

[19]  Kenneth Moreland,et al.  Diverging Color Maps for Scientific Visualization , 2009, ISVC.

[20]  Charl P. Botha,et al.  Hybrid Scheduling in the DeVIDE Dataflow Visualisation Environment , 2008, SimVis.

[21]  Valerie Illingworth,et al.  The Penguin dictionary of physics , 1991 .

[22]  Marco Nolden,et al.  Interactive segmentation framework of the Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit , 2009, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[23]  Charl P. Botha,et al.  Measuring femoral lesions despite CT metal artefacts: a cadaveric study , 2011, Skeletal Radiology.

[24]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Fast generation of digitally reconstructed radiographs using attenuation fields with application to 2D-3D image registration , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[26]  Rob C Hoeben,et al.  Gene therapy and cement injection for restabilization of loosened hip prostheses. , 2008, Human Gene Therapy.

[27]  Ken Masamune,et al.  Image overlay for CT-guided needle insertions , 2005, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[28]  Marleen de Bruijne,et al.  2D-3D shape reconstruction of the distal femur from stereo X-ray imaging using statistical shape models , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[29]  Frank M Phillips,et al.  Minimally Invasive Treatments of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures , 2003, Spine.