Perspectives in Modeling Film Cooling of Turbine Blades by Transcending Conventional Two-Equation Turbulence Models

The paper presents recent trends in modeling jets in crossflow with relevance to film cooling of turbine blades. The aim is to compare two classes of turbulence models with respect to their predictive performance in reproducing near-wall flow physics and heat transfer. The study focuses on anisotropic eddy-viscosity/diffusivity models and explicit algebraic stress models, up to cubic fragments of strain and vorticity tensors. The first class of models are direct numerical simulation (DNS) based two-layer approaches transcending the conventional k2« model by means of a nonisotropic representation of the turbulent transport coefficients; this is employed in connection with a near-wall oneequation model resolving the semi-viscous sublayer. The aspects of this new strategy are based on known channel-flow and boundary layer DNS statistics. The other class of models are quadratic and cubic explicit algebraic stress formulations rigorously derived from second-moment closures. The stress-strain relations are solved in the context of a two-layer strategy resolving the near-wall region by means of a nonlinear one-equation model; the outer core flow is treated by use of the two-equation model. The models are tested for the film cooling of a flat plate by a row of streamwise injected jets. Comparison of the calculated and measured wall-temperature distributions shows that only the anisotropic eddy-viscosity/diffusivity model can correctly predict the spanwise spreading of the temperature field and reduce the strength of the secondary vortices. The wall-cooling effectiveness was found to essentially depend on these two particular flow features. The non-linear algebraic stress models were of a mixed quality in film-cooling calculations. @DOI: 10.1115/1.1485294#

[1]  J. Lumley,et al.  A Realizable Reynolds Stress Algebraic Equation Model , 1993 .

[2]  Brian Launder,et al.  On the Computation of Convective Heat Transfer in Complex Turbulent Flows , 1988 .

[3]  W. Rodi,et al.  Computation of film cooling of a flat plate by lateral injection from a row of holes , 1998 .

[4]  D. Hennecke,et al.  Highly resolved distribution of adiabatic film cooling effectiveness for turbine leading edge film cooling , 1997 .

[5]  Alan Quarmby,et al.  Axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric turbulent diffusion in a plain circular tube at high Schmidt number , 1974 .

[6]  H. L. Norris,et al.  Turbulent channel flow with a moving wavy boundary , 1975 .

[7]  A. D. Gosman,et al.  The Turbulent Jet in a Cross Stream at Low Injection Rates: a Three-Dimensional Numerical Treatment , 1978 .

[8]  B. Launder,et al.  Development and application of a cubic eddy-viscosity model of turbulence , 1996 .

[9]  D. Bogard,et al.  Film-cooling effectiveness downstream of a single row of holes with variable density ratio , 1990 .

[10]  J. Lumley,et al.  A new Reynolds stress algebraic equation model , 1994 .

[11]  N. Kleiser L. Gilbert Turbulence Model Testing with the Aid of Direct Numerical Simulation Results , 1992 .

[12]  Wolfgang Rodi,et al.  Experience with two-layer models combining the k-epsilon model with a one-equation model near the wall , 1991 .

[13]  James H. Leylek,et al.  Performance of Turbulence Models and Near-Wall Treatments in Discrete Jet Film Cooling Simulations , 1998 .

[14]  David G. Bogard,et al.  Gas Turbine Film Cooling: Flowfield due to a Second Row of Holes , 1990 .

[15]  S. Girimaji Fully explicit and self-consistent algebraic Reynolds stress model , 1995 .

[16]  Sumanta Acharya,et al.  Predictions of a Film Coolant Jet in Crossflow With Different Turbulence Models , 1999 .

[17]  Wolfgang Rodi,et al.  One-Equation Near-Wall Turbulence Modeling With the Aid of Direct Simulation Data , 1990 .

[18]  W. Rodi,et al.  Three-Dimensional Calculations of the Flow Field around a Turbine Blade with Film Cooling Injection near the Leading Edge , 2001 .

[19]  T. Simon,et al.  Measurement of Eddy Diffusivity of Momentum in Film Cooling Flows With Streamwise Injection , 2000 .

[20]  B. Launder,et al.  Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  Djamel Lakehal,et al.  Three-dimensional flow and heat transfer calculations of film cooling at the leading edge of a symmetrical turbine blade model , 2001 .

[22]  James H. Leylek,et al.  Impact of Film-Cooling Jets on Turbine Aerodynamic Losses , 2000 .

[23]  P. Moin,et al.  Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  F. Thiele,et al.  Sensitivity of turbulent shedding flows to non-linear stress–strain relations and Reynolds stress models , 2000 .

[25]  Wolfgang Rodi,et al.  Three-Dimensional Finite-Volume Method for Incompressible Flows With Complex Boundaries , 1992 .

[26]  J. H. Leylek,et al.  Discrete-Jet Film Cooling: A Comparison of Computational Results With Experiments , 1993 .

[27]  Vijay K. Garg,et al.  Comparison of two-equation turbulence models for prediction of heat transfer on film-cooled turbine blades , 1997 .

[28]  W. Jones,et al.  The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence , 1972 .

[29]  M. E. Crawford,et al.  Gas Turbine Film Cooling: Flowfield Due to a Second Row of Holes , 1991 .

[30]  C. Rhie,et al.  A numerical study of the turbulent flow past an isolated airfoil with trailing edge separation , 1982 .

[31]  T. Gatski,et al.  On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.