Side peak suppression in responses of an across-frequency integration model to stimuli of varying bandwidth as demonstrated analytically and by implementation

Multiplication-like sound localization models are subjected to phase ambiguities for high-frequency tonal stimuli as multiplication creates several equivalent response peaks in tuning curves. By increasing the bandwidth of the stimulus, phase ambiguities can be reduced, which is often referred to as side peak suppression. In this study we present a Jeffress-based sound localization model, and determine side peak suppression analytically. The results were verified with an implementation of the same model, and compared to physiological data of barn owls. Three types of stimuli were analyzed: pure-tone stimuli, two-tone complexes with varying frequency distances, and noise signals with variable bandwidths. As an additional parameter we also determined the half-width of the main response peak to examine the scaling of tuning curves in azimuth. Results showed that side peak suppression did not only depend on bandwidth, but also on the center frequency and the distance of the side peak to the main response peak. In particular, the analytical model predicted that side peak suppression is a function of relative bandwidth, whereas half-width is inversely proportional to center frequency, with a proportionality factor depending on relative bandwidth. The analytical approach and the implementation yielded equivalent tuning curves (deviation < 1 %). Moreover, the electrophysiological data recorded in barn owls closely matched the predicted tuning curves.

[1]  Jonathan Z. Simon,et al.  Modeling coincidence detection in nucleus laminaris , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  Luis Almeida,et al.  A Sound Localizer Robust to Reverberation , 2003 .

[3]  Philip H Smith,et al.  Coincidence Detection in the Auditory System 50 Years after Jeffress , 1998, Neuron.

[4]  K. Saberi,et al.  Neural bases of an auditory illusion and its elimination in owls , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  C. Carr,et al.  Organization of the nucleus magnocellularis and the nucleus laminaris in the barn owl: Encoding and measuring interaural time differences , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  Go Ashida,et al.  Sound localization: Jeffress and beyond , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  M. Konishi,et al.  Axonal delay lines for time measurement in the owl's brainstem. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Manipulating the "straightness" and "curvature" of patterns of interaural cross correlation affects listeners' sensitivity to changes in interaural delay. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  H. Wagner,et al.  Representation of interaural time difference in the central nucleus of the barn owl's inferior colliculus , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Brian J. Fischer,et al.  Multiplicative Auditory Spatial Receptive Fields Created by a Hierarchy of Population Codes , 2009, PloS one.

[11]  M. Konishi,et al.  Selectivity for interaural time difference in the owl's midbrain , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  Pablo E. Jercog,et al.  Asymmetric Excitatory Synaptic Dynamics Underlie Interaural Time Difference Processing in the Auditory System , 2010, PLoS biology.

[13]  M. Konishi,et al.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  M Konishi,et al.  Auditory Spatial Receptive Fields Created by Multiplication , 2001, Science.

[15]  L. Carney,et al.  A model for binaural response properties of inferior colliculus neurons. I. A model with interaural time difference-sensitive excitatory and inhibitory inputs. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Tim Brookes,et al.  Dynamic Precedence Effect Modeling for Source Separation in Reverberant Environments , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[17]  Gerhard Lakemeyer,et al.  Azimuthal sound localization using coincidence of timing across frequency on a robotic platform. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  K Saberi,et al.  How do owls localize interaurally phase-ambiguous signals? , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M Konishi,et al.  Cellular mechanisms for resolving phase ambiguity in the owl's inferior colliculus. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  Chapter 11 – MODELS OF BINAURAL INTERACTION , 1978 .

[21]  M. Konishi,et al.  Neural map of interaural phase difference in the owl's brainstem. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Andreas Wenzel,et al.  Noninvasive, In Vivo Assessment of Mouse Retinal Structure Using Optical Coherence Tomography , 2009, PloS one.

[23]  H. Wagner,et al.  Improvements of Sound Localization Abilities by the Facial Ruff of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) as Demonstrated by Virtual Ruff Removal , 2009, PloS one.

[24]  J A Mazer,et al.  How the owl resolves auditory coding ambiguity. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  B C Wheeler,et al.  Localization of multiple sound sources with two microphones. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  H. Steven Colburn,et al.  Point-neuron model for binaural interaction in MSO , 1993, Hearing Research.

[27]  H Steven Colburn,et al.  Coincidence model of MSO responses , 1990, Hearing Research.

[28]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  The representation of sound localization cues in the barn owl's inferior colliculus , 2012, Front. Neural Circuits.

[29]  Dennis T. T. Plachta,et al.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency , 2010, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[30]  L A JEFFRESS,et al.  A place theory of sound localization. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[31]  Ben Supper,et al.  An auditory onset detection algorithm for improved automatic source localization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[32]  T. Yin,et al.  A matter of time: internal delays in binaural processing , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[33]  Christian Leibold,et al.  Frequency-Invariant Representation of Interaural Time Differences in Mammals , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[34]  José Luis Peña,et al.  Noise Reduction of Coincidence Detector Output by the Inferior Colliculus of the Barn Owl , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Properties of low-frequency head-related transfer functions in the barn owl (Tyto alba) , 2010, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[36]  C. Faller,et al.  Source localization in complex listening situations: selection of binaural cues based on interaural coherence. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  C. Leibold Influence of inhibitory synaptic kinetics on the interaural time difference sensitivity in a linear model of binaural coincidence detection. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Distribution of Interaural Time Difference in the Barn Owl's Inferior Colliculus in the Low- and High-Frequency Ranges , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Influence of the facial ruff on the sound-receiving characteristics of the barn owl’s ears , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[40]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Lateralization produced by envelope-based interaural temporal disparities of high-frequency, raised-sine stimuli: empirical data and modeling. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  J. Rinzel,et al.  The role of dendrites in auditory coincidence detection , 1998, Nature.

[42]  H. Gurden,et al.  Alteration of sensory-evoked metabolic and oscillatory activities in the olfactory bulb of GLAST-deficient mice , 2012, Front. Neural Circuits.

[43]  B. Delgutte,et al.  A Physiologically Based Model of Interaural Time Difference Discrimination , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  L. Carney,et al.  A Model for Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity in the Medial Superior Olive: Interaction of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synaptic Inputs, Channel Dynamics, and Cellular Morphology , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Torsten Marquardt,et al.  Representation of interaural time delay in the human auditory midbrain , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Lateralization produced by interaural temporal and intensitive disparities of high-frequency, raised-sine stimuli: data and modeling. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  Volker Willert,et al.  A Probabilistic Model for Binaural Sound Localization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[48]  C. Köppl Phase Locking to High Frequencies in the Auditory Nerve and Cochlear Nucleus Magnocellularis of the Barn Owl, Tyto alba , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.