Transitioning Nuclear Power Plant Main Control Room From Paper Based Procedures to Computer Based Procedures

The United States (U.S.) has 99 operating Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs). The majority of these were designed and commissioned in the 1970s and 1980s. Plants are modernizing their control systems and main control rooms to be able to continue operating past their original 40-year license agreements. U.S. NPP main control rooms are migrating towards hybrid controls with both digital and analog systems. Digital upgrades, while costly, provide improved reliability, reduced maintenance cost, and the potential for fewer unplanned outages and fewer human errors. U.S. utilities have been slow to embrace computerized procedure system (CBP) research, even though CBPs demonstrate clear operational and human factors benefits. Most of the CBP research has been oriented to new reactor designs or full digital control rooms and is not applicable to the piecemeal modernization approach favored by U.S. plants. Research is needed to examine how CBPs impact operations in hybrid control rooms, and how current paper based procedures can be efficiently migrated to computerized platforms. Work is underway to develop tools and perform the obligatory research needed to design and validate CBPs for modernized U.S. nuclear control rooms.

[1]  Bruce G. Coury,et al.  Status or Recommendation: Selecting the Type of Information for Decision Aiding , 1990 .

[2]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  EFFECTS OF UNRELIABLE AUTOMATION ON DECISION MAKING IN COMMAND AND CONTROL , 2002 .

[3]  Ronald L. Boring,et al.  Nuclear Reactor Crew Evaluation of a Computerized Operator Support System HMI for Chemical and Volume Control System , 2017, HCI.

[4]  Yves Dien,et al.  Allowing for Human Factors in Computerized Procedure Design , 1991 .

[5]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Jaewhan Kim,et al.  Some empirical insights on diagnostic performance of the operating crew in a computer‐based advanced control room , 2011 .

[7]  M.M. Lehman,et al.  Programs, life cycles, and laws of software evolution , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  Chiuhsiang Joe Lin,et al.  The impact of computer-based procedures on team performance, communication, and situation awareness , 2016 .

[9]  John M. O'Hara,et al.  Computer-Based Procedure Systems: Technical Basis and Human Factors Review Guidance , 2000 .

[10]  Ronald L. Boring,et al.  Review of Computerized Procedure Guidelines for Nuclear Power Plant Control Rooms , 2011 .

[11]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Supporting Decision Making and Action Selection under Time Pressure and Uncertainty: The Case of In-Flight Icing , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Ronald L. Boring,et al.  Advanced Nuclear Interface Modeling Environment (ANIME): A Tool for Developing Human-Computer Interfaces for Experimental Process Control Systems , 2017, HCI.

[13]  Jeffrey C. Joe,et al.  Requirements for Control Room Computer-Based Procedures for use in Hybrid Control Rooms , 2015 .