Direct comparison of line edge roughness measurements by SEM and a metrological tilting-atomic force microscopy for reference metrology

Abstract. Background: Conventional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) that is used for 2D top-view metrology, a classical line edge roughness (LER) measurement technique, is incapable of measuring 3D structures of a nanoscale line pattern. For LER measurements, SEM measurement generates a single line-edge profile for the 3D sidewall roughness, although the line-edge profile differs at each height in the 3D sidewall. Aim: To develop an evaluation method of SEM-based LER measurement techniques and to verify how the 3D sidewall shape is reflected in the SEM’s 2D result. Approach: Direct comparison by measuring an identical location of a line pattern by SEM and an atomic force microscopy (AFM) with the tip-tilting technique that is capable of measuring the 3D sidewall. The line pattern has vertical stripes on the sidewall due to its fabrication process. Measured line edge profiles were analyzed using power spectral density, height-height correlation function, and autocorrelation function. Results: Line edge profiles measured by SEM and AFM were well matched except for noise level. Frequency and scaling analyses showed that SEM profile contained high noise and had lost a property of self-affine fractals in contrast to AFM. Conclusions: In the case of the line pattern with vertical stripes on the sidewall, SEM profile is generally consistent with 3D sidewall shape. The AFM-based LER measurement technique is useful as LER reference metrology to evaluate other LER measurement techniques.

[1]  S. C. Palmateer,et al.  Comparison of metrology methods for quantifying the line edge roughness of patterned features , 1999 .

[2]  Ryosuke Kizu,et al.  Line edge roughness measurement on vertical sidewall for reference metrology using a metrological tilting atomic force microscope , 2020 .

[3]  P. Faurie,et al.  The LER/LWR metrology challenge for advance process control through 3D-AFM and CD-SEM , 2009, Lithography Asia.

[4]  Gaoliang Dai,et al.  Measurements of CD and sidewall profile of EUV photomask structures using CD-AFM and tilting-AFM , 2014 .

[5]  Yuuki Iwaki,et al.  3D-profile measurement of advanced semiconductor features by using FIB as reference metrology , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Vladimir A. Ukraintsev,et al.  Review of reference metrology for nanotechnology: significance, challenges, and solutions , 2012 .

[7]  Gian Francesco Lorusso,et al.  The need for LWR metrology standardization: the imec roughness protocol , 2018, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Ryosuke Kizu,et al.  Comparison of SEM and AFM performances for LER reference metrology , 2020, Advanced Lithography.

[9]  J. S. Villarrubia,et al.  Unbiased estimation of linewidth roughness , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[10]  C. Mack,et al.  Unbiased roughness measurements: Subtracting out SEM effects , 2018 .

[11]  E. Gogolides,et al.  Line edge roughness and critical dimension variation: Fractal characterization and comparison using model functions , 2004 .

[12]  Evangelos Gogolides,et al.  Deep learning denoising of SEM images towards noise-reduced LER measurements , 2019, Microelectronic Engineering.

[13]  Angeliki Tserepi,et al.  Quantification of line-edge roughness of photoresists. II. Scaling and fractal analysis and the best roughness descriptors , 2003 .

[14]  Ndubuisi G. Orji,et al.  Line edge roughness metrology using atomic force microscopes , 2005 .

[15]  Palasantzas,et al.  Roughness spectrum and surface width of self-affine fractal surfaces via the K-correlation model. , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[16]  Satoru Takahashi,et al.  Linewidth roughness of advanced semiconductor features using focused ion beam and planar-transmission electron microscope as reference metrology , 2018 .

[17]  Ryosuke Kizu,et al.  Development of a metrological atomic force microscope with a tip-tilting mechanism for 3D nanometrology , 2018 .

[18]  Sophia Wang,et al.  Practical and bias-free LWR measurement by CDSEM , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[19]  Chris A. Mack Comparing edge detection algorithms: their impact on unbiased roughness measurement precision and accuracy , 2020, Advanced Lithography.

[20]  Olivier Joubert,et al.  Unbiased line width roughness measurements with critical dimension scanning electron microscopy and critical dimension atomic force microscopy , 2012 .

[21]  Narendra Chaudhary,et al.  Line roughness estimation and Poisson denoising in scanning electron microscope images using deep learning , 2019, Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS.

[22]  Steffen Marschmeyer,et al.  Characterization of Si nanowaveguide line edge roughness and its effect on light transmission , 2012 .

[23]  Marc Fouchier,et al.  An atomic force microscopy-based method for line edge roughness measurement , 2013 .

[24]  Hui Xie,et al.  Advances in the atomic force microscopy for critical dimension metrology , 2016 .

[25]  C. Shin,et al.  3-D Quasi-Atomistic Model for Line Edge Roughness in Nonplanar MOSFETs , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[26]  Yueming Hua,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of undercut and sidewall structures by atomic force microscopy. , 2011, The Review of scientific instruments.