A Cooperative Coordination Solver for Travelling Thief Problems

In the travelling thief problem (TTP), a thief undertakes a cyclic tour through a set of cities, and according to a picking plan, picks a subset of available items into a rented knapsack with limited capacity. The overall aim is to maximise profit while minimising renting cost. TTP combines two interdependent components: the travelling salesman problem (TSP) and the knapsack problem (KP). Existing TTP approaches typically solve the TSP and KP components in an interleaved fashion: the solution of one component is fixed while the solution of the other is changed. This indicates poor coordination between solving the two components, which may lead to poor quality TTP solutions. The 2-OPT heuristic is often used for solving the TSP component, which reverses a segment in the tour. Within the TTP context, 2-OPT does not take into account the picking plan, which can result in a lower objective value. This in turn can result in the tour modification to be rejected by a solver. To address this, we propose an extended form of 2-OPT in order to change the picking plan in coordination with modifying the tour. Items deemed as less profitable and picked in cities earlier in the reversed segment are replaced by items that tend to be equally or more profitable and not picked in cities later in the reversed segment. The picking plan is further changed through a modified form of the bit-flip search, where changes in the picking state are only permitted for boundary items, which are defined as lowest profitable picked items or highest profitable unpicked items. This restriction reduces the amount of time spent on the KP component, allowing more tours to be evaluated by the TSP component within a given time budget. The two modified heuristics form the basis of a new cooperative coordination solver, which is shown to outperform several state-of-the-art TTP solvers on a broad range of benchmark TTP instances.

[1]  G. Croes A Method for Solving Traveling-Salesman Problems , 1958 .

[2]  Henryk Sienkiewicz,et al.  Quo Vadis? , 1967, American Association of Industrial Nurses journal.

[3]  Kenneth A. De Jong,et al.  A Cooperative Coevolutionary Approach to Function Optimization , 1994, PPSN.

[4]  Yeong-Dae Kim,et al.  Simulated annealing and genetic algorithms for scheduling products with multi-level product structure , 1996, Comput. Oper. Res..

[5]  Thomas Stützle,et al.  MAX-MIN Ant System , 2000, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[6]  Roger Sauter,et al.  Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis , 2002, Technometrics.

[7]  William J. Cook,et al.  Chained Lin-Kernighan for Large Traveling Salesman Problems , 2003, INFORMS Journal on Computing.

[8]  H. Kellerer,et al.  Introduction to NP-Completeness of Knapsack Problems , 2004 .

[9]  Toby Walsh,et al.  Handbook of Constraint Programming , 2006, Handbook of Constraint Programming.

[10]  Abraham P. Punnen,et al.  The traveling salesman problem and its variations , 2007 .

[11]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Quo Vadis, Evolutionary Computation? - On a Growing Gap between Theory and Practice , 2012, WCCI.

[12]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  The travelling thief problem: The first step in the transition from theoretical problems to realistic problems , 2013, 2013 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[13]  Тараса Шевченка,et al.  Quo vadis? , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[14]  Adam Wierzbicki,et al.  Socially inspired algorithms for the travelling thief problem , 2014, GECCO.

[15]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  Improving Efficiency of Heuristics for the Large Scale Traveling Thief Problem , 2014, SEAL.

[16]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  A comprehensive benchmark set and heuristics for the traveling thief problem , 2014, GECCO.

[17]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  Heuristic evolution with genetic programming for traveling thief problem , 2015, 2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC).

[18]  Markus Wagner,et al.  Approximate Approaches to the Traveling Thief Problem , 2015, GECCO.

[19]  Mohamed El Yafrani,et al.  Population-based vs. Single-solution Heuristics for the Travelling Thief Problem , 2016, GECCO.

[20]  Shalabh,et al.  Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis , 2016 .

[21]  Markus Wagner,et al.  Stealing Items More Efficiently with Ants: A Swarm Intelligence Approach to the Travelling Thief Problem , 2016, ANTS Conference.

[22]  Markus Wagner,et al.  A hyperheuristic approach based on low-level heuristics for the travelling thief problem , 2018, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines.

[23]  Mohamed El Yafrani,et al.  A local search based approach for solving the Travelling Thief Problem: The pros and cons , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[24]  Markus Wagner,et al.  HSEDA: a heuristic selection approach based on estimation of distribution algorithm for the travelling thief problem , 2017, GECCO 2017.

[25]  Markus Wagner,et al.  A case study of algorithm selection for the traveling thief problem , 2016, Journal of Heuristics.

[26]  Mohamed El Yafrani,et al.  Efficiently solving the Traveling Thief Problem using hill climbing and simulated annealing , 2018, Inf. Sci..

[27]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Evolutionary computation for multicomponent problems: opportunities and future directions , 2016, Optimization in Industry.

[28]  Conrad Sanderson,et al.  A Profit Guided Coordination Heuristic for Travelling Thief Problems , 2019, SOCS.