The Covariance Decomposition of the Probability Score and Its Use in Evaluating Prognostic Estimates

The probability score (PS) or Brier score has been used in a large number of studies in which physician judgment performance was assessed. However, the covariance decom position of the PS has not previously been used to evaluate medical judgment. The authors introduce the technique and demonstrate it by analyzing prognostic estimates of three groups: physicians, their patients, and the patients' decision-making surrogates. The major com ponents of the covariance decomposition—bias, slope, and scatter—are displayed in co variance graphs for each of the three groups. The decomposition reveals that whereas the physicians have the best overall estimation performance, their bias and their scatter are not always superior to those of the other two groups. This is primarily due to two factors. First, the physicians' prognostic estimates are pessimistic. Second, the patients place the large majority of their estimates in the most optimistic category, thereby achieving low scatter. The authors suggest that the calculational simplicity of this decomposition, its informative- ness, and the intuitive nature of its components make it a useful tool with which to analyze medical judgment. Key words: covariance decomposition; calibration; prognostic estimation; surrogate; probability score. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:120-131)

[1]  N. Riesco,et al.  Denial mechanisms in myocardial infarction: their relations with psychological variables and short-term outcome. , 1992, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[2]  R. L. Winkler,et al.  Are two (inexperienced) heads better than one (experienced) head? Averaging house officers' prognostic judgments for critically ill patients. , 1990, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  G. Brier VERIFICATION OF FORECASTS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF PROBABILITY , 1950 .

[4]  G. Brier,et al.  External correspondence: Decompositions of the mean probability score , 1982 .

[5]  J G Dolan,et al.  An Eualuation of Clinicians' Subjective Prior Probability Estimates , 1986, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Probabilistic forecasts of stock prices and earnings: The hazards of nascent expertise , 1991 .

[7]  Roy M. Poses,et al.  What Difference Do Two Days Make? The Inertia of Physicians' Sequential Prognostic Judgments for Critically III Patients , 1990, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[8]  D M Chaput de Saintonge,et al.  Clinical judgment in rheumatoid arthritis. II. Judging 'current disease activity' in clinical practice. , 1983, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[9]  A S Detsky,et al.  Prognosis, survival, and the expenditure of hospital resources for patients in an intensive-care unit. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  SUPPORT: Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. Study design. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  R D Cebul,et al.  The accuracy of experienced physicians' probability estimates for patients with sore throats. Implications for decision making. , 1985, JAMA.

[12]  R S Wigton,et al.  Use of Linear Models to Analyze Physicians' Decisions , 1988, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[13]  A. H. Murphy A New Vector Partition of the Probability Score , 1973 .

[14]  J. Civetta,et al.  Therapeutic intervention scoring system: a method for quantitative comparison of patient care. , 1974, Critical care medicine.

[15]  D. Spiegelhalter Statistical methodology for evaluating gastrointestinal symptoms. , 1985, Clinics in gastroenterology.

[16]  R M Centor,et al.  Eualuating Physicians' Probabilistic Judgments , 1988, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[17]  D. McClish,et al.  How Well Can Physicians Estimate Mortality in a Medical Intensive Care Unit? , 1989, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[18]  J P Ornato,et al.  Use of Clinical Judgment Analysis to Explain Regional Variations in Physicians' Accuracies in Diagnosing Pneumonia , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[19]  D A Redelmeier,et al.  Assessing predictive accuracy: how to compare Brier scores. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  G. Fricchione,et al.  Psychological adjustment to end-stage renal disease and the implications of denial. , 1992, Psychosomatics.

[21]  T D Koepsell,et al.  Effects of expertise and experience on risk judgments. , 1983, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  W. Knaus,et al.  The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. , 1991, Chest.

[23]  D H Hickam,et al.  Teaching medical students to estimate probability of coronary artery disease , 1987, Journal of general internal medicine.

[24]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[25]  M. Siegler Pascal's wager and the hanging of crepe. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Judgment and Decision Making , 1990 .

[27]  F. Harrell,et al.  Predicting outcome in coronary disease. Statistical models versus expert clinicians. , 1986, The American journal of medicine.

[28]  T. Speroff,et al.  Lens Model Analysis of Hemodynamic status in the critically III , 1989, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.