Visualisation of dCas9 target search in vivo using an open-microscopy framework

CRISPR-Cas9 is widely used in genomic editing, but the kinetics of target search and its relation to the cellular concentration of Cas9 have remained elusive. Effective target search requires constant screening of the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) and a 30 ms upper limit for screening was recently found. To further quantify the rapid switching between DNA-bound and freely-diffusing states of dCas9, we developed an open-microscopy framework, the miCube, and introduce Monte-Carlo diffusion distribution analysis (MC-DDA). Our analysis reveals that dCas9 is screening PAMs 40% of the time in Gram-positive Lactoccous lactis, averaging 17 ± 4 ms per binding event. Using heterogeneous dCas9 expression, we determine the number of cellular target-containing plasmids and derive the copy number dependent Cas9 cleavage. Furthermore, we show that dCas9 is not irreversibly bound to target sites but can still interfere with plasmid replication. Taken together, our quantitative data facilitates further optimization of the CRISPR-Cas toolbox. Single-particle tracking PALM (sptPALM) provides quantitative information in vivo if the protein of interest remains in a single diffusional state during track acquisition. Here the authors develop a custom-built sptPALM microscope and a Monte-Carlo based diffusion distribution analysis to study dynamic DNA-dCas9 interactions in live bacteria.

[1]  Mark Bates,et al.  Three-Dimensional Super-Resolution Imaging by Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy , 2008, Science.

[2]  Rao Fu,et al.  A simple and cost-effective setup for super-resolution localization microscopy , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Keith A. Lidke,et al.  Fast, single-molecule localization that achieves theoretically minimum uncertainty , 2010, Nature Methods.

[4]  Melia E Bonomo,et al.  The physicist’s guide to one of biotechnology’s hottest new topics: CRISPR-Cas , 2017, Physical biology.

[5]  Samuel H Sternberg,et al.  Real-time observation of DNA recognition and rejection by the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9 , 2016, Nature Communications.

[6]  Y. S. Zhang,et al.  A cost-effective fluorescence mini-microscope for biomedical applications. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[7]  Xilin Zhao,et al.  Quinolone-Mediated Bacterial Death , 2007, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[8]  M. Lakadamyali,et al.  Single-molecule evaluation of fluorescent protein photoactivation efficiency using an in vivo nanotemplate , 2014, Nature Methods.

[9]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  High-density mapping of single-molecule trajectories with photoactivated localization microscopy , 2008, Nature Methods.

[10]  D. Prazeres Prediction of diffusion coefficients of plasmids. , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  Hazen P Babcock,et al.  Multiplane and Spectrally-Resolved Single Molecule Localization Microscopy with Industrial Grade CMOS cameras , 2017, bioRxiv.

[12]  Yinqing Li,et al.  Crystal Structure of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 , 2015, Cell.

[13]  Takeharu Nagai,et al.  Shift anticipated in DNA microarray market , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Koen J. A. Martens,et al.  Direct visualization of native CRISPR target search in live bacteria reveals Cascade DNA surveillance mechanism , 2019, bioRxiv.

[15]  B. Poolman,et al.  Genome Sequences of Lactococcus lactis MG1363 (Revised) and NZ9000 and Comparative Physiological Studies , 2010, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  M. Jinek,et al.  Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease , 2014, Nature.

[17]  W. D. de Vos,et al.  Standardized Assay Medium To Measure Lactococcus lactis Enzyme Activities while Mimicking Intracellular Conditions , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[18]  Philippe Horvath,et al.  The Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR/Cas system provides immunity in Escherichia coli , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  J. T. Edward,et al.  Molecular Volumes and the Stokes-Einstein Equation. , 1970 .

[20]  Kees Jalink,et al.  The fidelity of stochastic single-molecule super-resolution reconstructions critically depends upon robust background estimation , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Nicholas A Moringo,et al.  Single Particle Tracking: From Theory to Biophysical Applications. , 2017, Chemical reviews.

[22]  R. Barrangou,et al.  Cas9–crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Sebastian van de Linde,et al.  A blueprint for cost-efficient localization microscopy. , 2014, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[24]  L. Mirny,et al.  Kinetics of protein-DNA interaction: facilitated target location in sequence-dependent potential. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[25]  B. Martínez,et al.  A bacteriocin gene cluster able to enhance plasmid maintenance in Lactococcus lactis , 2014, Microbial Cell Factories.

[26]  Michael J. Lawson,et al.  Kinetics of dCas9 target search in Escherichia coli , 2017, Science.

[27]  Yusdi Santoso,et al.  Characterizing single-molecule FRET dynamics with probability distribution analysis. , 2010, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[28]  Shane Scott,et al.  Open-frame system for single-molecule microscopy. , 2015, The Review of scientific instruments.

[29]  Bernd Rieger,et al.  Phasor based single-molecule localization microscopy in 3D (pSMLM-3D): An algorithm for MHz localization rates using standard CPUs. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[30]  J. Paulsson,et al.  Evaluating quantitative methods for measuring plasmid copy numbers in single cells. , 2012, Plasmid.

[31]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9 , 2014, Nature.

[32]  Robin Diekmann,et al.  Characterization of an industry-grade CMOS camera well suited for single molecule localization microscopy – high performance super-resolution at low cost , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[33]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Watersheds in Digital Spaces: An Efficient Algorithm Based on Immersion Simulations , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[34]  R. Tjian,et al.  Dynamics of CRISPR-Cas9 genome interrogation in living cells , 2015, Science.

[35]  C. Zimmer,et al.  ZOLA-3D allows flexible 3D localization microscopy over an adjustable axial range , 2018, Nature Communications.

[36]  R. Barrangou,et al.  CRISPR-based engineering of next-generation lactic acid bacteria. , 2017, Current opinion in microbiology.

[37]  Howard M. Salis,et al.  A Biophysical Model of CRISPR/Cas9 Activity for Rational Design of Genome Editing and Gene Regulation , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  W. D. de Vos,et al.  Cloning of usp45, a gene encoding a secreted protein from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis MG1363. , 1990, Gene.

[39]  Johannes Hohlbein,et al.  Camera-based single-molecule FRET detection with improved time resolution. , 2015, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[40]  M. Kleerebezem,et al.  Versatile Cas9-Driven Subpopulation Selection Toolbox for Lactococcus lactis , 2018, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[41]  R. Siezen,et al.  Molecular Description and Industrial Potential of Tn6098 Conjugative Transfer Conferring Alpha-Galactoside Metabolism in Lactococcus lactis , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[42]  W. Vos Gene cloning and expression in lactic streptococci , 1987 .

[43]  Suliana Manley,et al.  Photoactivatable mCherry for high-resolution two-color fluorescence microscopy , 2009, Nature Methods.

[44]  C. Joo,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 searches for a protospacer adjacent motif by lateral diffusion , 2019, The EMBO journal.

[45]  D. Grier,et al.  Methods of Digital Video Microscopy for Colloidal Studies , 1996 .

[46]  Valentina Tozzini,et al.  Diffusion within the cytoplasm: a mesoscale model of interacting macromolecules. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[47]  S. van Teeffelen,et al.  Tuning dCas9's ability to block transcription enables robust, noiseless knockdown of bacterial genes , 2018, Molecular systems biology.

[48]  S. Stallinga,et al.  The lateral and axial localization uncertainty in super-resolution light microscopy. , 2014, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[49]  Koen J. A. Martens,et al.  Evaluating single-particle tracking by photo-activation localization microscopy (sptPALM) in Lactococcus lactis , 2019, Physical biology.

[50]  Guy M. Hagen,et al.  ThunderSTORM: a comprehensive ImageJ plug-in for PALM and STORM data analysis and super-resolution imaging , 2014, Bioinform..

[51]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[52]  Oscar P. Kuipers,et al.  Quorum sensing-controlled gene expression in lactic acid bacteria , 1998 .

[53]  Maximilian T. Strauss,et al.  Nanometer-scale Multiplexed Super-Resolution Imaging with an Economic 3D-DNA-PAINT Microscope. , 2018, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[54]  J. Wells,et al.  Improved cloning vectors and transformation procedure for Lactococcus lactis. , 1993, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[55]  Rainer Heintzmann,et al.  cellSTORM—Cost-effective super-resolution on a cellphone using dSTORM , 2018, PloS one.

[56]  Matthew S. Graus,et al.  Single molecule localization microscopy with autonomous feedback loops for ultrahigh precision , 2018 .

[57]  Nuclease dead Cas9 is a programmable roadblock for DNA replication , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[58]  Benjamin L. Oakes,et al.  CRISPR-CasX is an RNA-dominated enzyme active for human genome editing , 2019, Nature.

[59]  A. Kapanidis,et al.  Single-molecule and super-resolution imaging of transcription in living bacteria , 2017, Methods.

[60]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Dynamic Imaging of Genomic Loci in Living Human Cells by an Optimized CRISPR/Cas System , 2014, Cell.

[61]  Kerstin Pingel,et al.  50 Years of Image Analysis , 2012 .

[62]  J. Torella,et al.  Conformational transitions in DNA polymerase I revealed by single-molecule FRET , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Michiel Kleerebezem,et al.  10 years of the nisin-controlled gene expression system (NICE) in Lactococcus lactis , 2005, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[64]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  CRISPR-Cas , 2013, RNA biology.

[65]  Katharina Gaus,et al.  NicoLase—An open-source diode laser combiner, fiber launch, and sequencing controller for fluorescence microscopy , 2017, PloS one.

[66]  Feng Zhang,et al.  CRISPR-assisted editing of bacterial genomes , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[67]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Single-molecule DNA repair in live bacteria , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  Mark A A Neil,et al.  easySTORM: a robust, lower‐cost approach to localisation and TIRF microscopy , 2016, Journal of biophotonics.

[69]  Ricardo Henriques,et al.  PALM and STORM: Into large fields and high-throughput microscopy with sCMOS detectors. , 2015, Methods.

[70]  David R. Liu,et al.  CRISPR-Based Technologies for the Manipulation of Eukaryotic Genomes , 2017, Cell.

[71]  Robert Wohlhueter,et al.  Genetically modified foods: A critical review of their promise and problems , 2016 .

[72]  Luke A. Gilbert,et al.  Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression , 2013, Cell.

[73]  Benjamin L. Oakes,et al.  CRISPR-CasX is an RNA-dominated enzyme active for human genome editing , 2019, Nature.

[74]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[75]  Henry Pinkard,et al.  Advanced methods of microscope control using μManager software. , 2014, Journal of biological methods.