Inspection system for rail surfaces using differential images

In this paper a surface inspection system for rails is proposed. There is a lack of commercial systems and publications about surface inspection of rails. Therefore, the quality control developed by rail manufacturers depends on their own developed systems or on the equipments provided by very few sellers. Commercial systems must be configured manually by experts of seller companies. The configuration process requires large sets of all types of manufactured rails along several periods of time and the active participation of the quality engineers of the manufacturer. This is a long, cumbersome and very expensive process. In this paper we propose a new system that can be configured using a systematic method that can be performed by the quality engineers of the manufacturer. The proposed inspection system uses differential images of the rail surfaces obtained with a technique called the Spectral Images Differentiation Procedure. These images are processed using a computer vision algorithm that looks for variations in the pixel values among the images. In order to offer more information, a neural network approach is used for classifying detected defects into six types. The proposed system is an open solution for the inspection of rail surface, easy to implement at an affordable cost, which can be systematically configured by the quality engineers of the manufacturing company.

[1]  Jaime A. Camelio,et al.  Real-time fault detection in manufacturing environments using face recognition techniques , 2010, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[2]  Ching-Yuen Chan,et al.  A particle swarm optimization approach for components placement inspection on printed circuit boards , 2009 .

[3]  Siti Mariyam Shamsuddin,et al.  Classification with class imbalance problem: A review , 2015, SOCO 2015.

[4]  Robert J. Woodham,et al.  Photometric method for determining surface orientation from multiple images , 1980 .

[5]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Guided wave inspection potential of defects in rail , 2004 .

[6]  Mohamed S. Kamel,et al.  On the optimal number of hidden nodes in a neural network , 1998, Conference Proceedings. IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (Cat. No.98TH8341).

[7]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[8]  Wan Wei-han Product Quality Control and Its Applications in Industry , 2001 .

[9]  Ching-Yuen Chan,et al.  A particle swarm optimization approach for components placement inspection on printed circuit boards , 2009, J. Intell. Manuf..

[10]  Shuxiang Xu,et al.  A novel approach for determining the optimal number of hidden layer neurons for FNN’s and its application in data mining , 2008 .

[11]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[12]  Ye Duan,et al.  Color Photometric Stereo for Albedo and Shape Reconstruction , 2008, 2008 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision.

[13]  Xue Xiao Laser Scanning On Line Inspection System for Ball Grid Array Coplanarity Measurement , 2001 .

[14]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  Data Mining for Imbalanced Datasets: An Overview , 2005, The Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook.

[16]  Richard W. Conners,et al.  Identifying and Locating Surface Defects in Wood: Part of an Automated Lumber Processing System , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  Euripides G. M. Petrakis,et al.  A survey on industrial vision systems, applications, tools , 2003, Image Vis. Comput..

[18]  E. Deutschl,et al.  Defect detection on rail surfaces by a vision based system , 2004, IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2004.

[19]  Ajay Kumar,et al.  Computer-Vision-Based Fabric Defect Detection: A Survey , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[20]  Daniel F. Garcia,et al.  A Non-Invasive Technique for Online Defect Detection on Steel Strip Surfaces , 2016 .