Aerothermal Optimization of Internal Cooling Passages Using a Discrete Adjoint Method

Aerothermal optimization is a powerful technique for the design of internal cooling passages because it maximizes heat transfer and simultaneously minimizes pressure loss. Moreover, the optimization is fully automatic, which reduces the duration of design process compared with a human-supervised design approach. Existing optimization studies commonly rely on gradient-free methods, which can only handle a small number of design variables. However, cooling passage designs use complex geometry configurations (e.g., serpentine channels with rib-roughened surfaces) to enhance heat transfer; what is needed is to parameterize the passage using a large number of design variables. To address this need, we perform aerothermal optimization using a gradient-based optimization algorithm along with the discrete adjoint method to compute derivatives. The benefit of using the adjoint method is that its computational cost is independent of the number of design variables. In this paper, we focus on optimizing a U-bend duct, which is representative of a simplified, rib-free turbine internal cooling passage. The duct geometry is parameterized using 135 design variables, which gives us sufficient design freedom for geometric modification. We construct a Pareto front for heat transfer enhancement and total pressure loss reduction by running multi-objective optimizations. We also compare our optimization results with those from the gradient-free methods and demonstrate that we achieve better pressure loss reduction and heat transfer enhancement. The above results show that our gradient-based optimization framework functions as desired and has the potential to be a useful tool for turbine aerothermal designs with full internal cooling configurations.

[1]  Cheng-Zhang Wang,et al.  Application of Adjoint Solver to Optimization of Fin Heat Exchanger , 2015 .

[2]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes , 2012, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[3]  Graeme J. Kennedy,et al.  Scalable Parallel Approach for High-Fidelity Steady-State Aeroelastic Analysis and Adjoint Derivative Computations , 2014 .

[4]  O. Pironneau On optimum profiles in Stokes flow , 1973, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization: A survey of architectures , 2013 .

[6]  Carsten Othmer,et al.  Adjoint methods for car aerodynamics , 2014, Journal of Mathematics in Industry.

[7]  Karim Mazaheri,et al.  Turbine blade cooling passages optimization using reduced conjugate heat transfer methodology , 2016 .

[8]  Marcus Meyer,et al.  Stabilisation of discrete steady adjoint solvers , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[9]  Jing Li,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimization of a U-Bend for Minimal Pressure Loss and Maximal Heat Transfer Performance in Internal Cooling Channels , 2013 .

[10]  Kwang-Yong Kim,et al.  Design Optimization of Internal Cooling Passage with V-shaped Ribs , 2007 .

[11]  Kyriakos C. Giannakoglou,et al.  Noise reduction in car aerodynamics using a surrogate objective function and the continuous adjoint method with wall functions , 2015 .

[12]  Niles A. Pierce,et al.  An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design , 2000 .

[13]  Matthew G. Knepley,et al.  PETSc Users Manual (Rev. 3.4) , 2014 .

[14]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic design via control theory , 1988, J. Sci. Comput..

[15]  Srinath V. Ekkad,et al.  Gas Turbine Heat Transfer and Cooling Technology , 2012 .

[16]  Hrvoje Jasak,et al.  A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques , 1998 .

[17]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A CAD-Free Approach to High-Fidelity Aerostructural Optimization , 2010 .

[18]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  An aerodynamic design optimization framework using a discrete adjoint approach with OpenFOAM , 2018 .

[19]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerodynamic shape optimization of wind turbine blades using a Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes model and an adjoint method , 2017 .

[20]  Eric Blades,et al.  A fast mesh deformation method using explicit interpolation , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[21]  C. Rhie,et al.  Numerical Study of the Turbulent Flow Past an Airfoil with Trailing Edge Separation , 1983 .

[22]  Schumacher Thomas,et al.  Adjoint Optimization for Vehicle External Aerodynamics , 2016 .

[23]  John T. Hwang,et al.  Review and Unification of Methods for Computing Derivatives of Multidisciplinary Computational Models , 2013 .

[24]  Zhenping Feng,et al.  Study on continuous adjoint optimization with turbulence models for aerodynamic performance and heat transfer in turbomachinery cascades , 2017 .

[25]  Timothy R. Brooks,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Aircraft Configurations Part 2 : High-fidelity aerostructural optimization , 2016 .

[26]  Aleksandar Jemcov,et al.  OpenFOAM: A C++ Library for Complex Physics Simulations , 2007 .

[27]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[28]  Timothy R. Brooks,et al.  Benchmark Aerostructural Models for the Study of Transonic Aircraft Wings , 2018, AIAA Journal.

[29]  William Gropp,et al.  Efficient Management of Parallelism in Object-Oriented Numerical Software Libraries , 1997, SciTools.

[30]  D. Mavriplis Discrete Adjoint-Based Approach for Optimization Problems on Three-Dimensional Unstructured Meshes , 2007 .

[31]  J. Alonso,et al.  ADjoint: An Approach for the Rapid Development of Discrete Adjoint Solvers , 2006 .

[32]  C. Othmer A continuous adjoint formulation for the computation of topological and surface sensitivities of ducted flows , 2008 .

[33]  John T. Hwang,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Aircraft Configurations Part 1 : A modular coupled adjoint approach , 2016 .

[34]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  pyOpt: a Python-based object-oriented framework for nonlinear constrained optimization , 2011, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[35]  J. Eric,et al.  Aerodynamic Design Optimization on Unstructured Meshes Using the Navier-Stokes Equations , 1998 .

[36]  D. Spalding,et al.  A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows , 1972 .

[37]  Tom Verstraete,et al.  Optimization of a U-Bend for Minimal Pressure Loss in Internal Cooling Channels—Part I: Numerical Method , 2013 .

[38]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  High-fidelity multipoint hydrostructural optimization of a 3-D hydrofoil , 2017 .

[39]  C. Mader,et al.  Stability-Constrained Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Flying Wings , 2013 .

[40]  Roque Corral,et al.  Comparison between aerodynamic designs obtained by human driven and automatic procedures , 2018 .

[41]  Kwang-Yong Kim,et al.  Efficient multi-objective optimization of a boot-shaped rib in a cooling channel , 2016 .

[42]  T. Verstraete,et al.  Optimization of a U-Bend for Minimal Pressure Loss in Internal Cooling Channels—Part II: Experimental Validation , 2013 .

[43]  Cody A. Paige,et al.  Automatic Differentiation Adjoint of the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Equations with a Turbulence Model , 2013 .