Far-Field Acoustic Investigation into Chevron Nozzle Mechanisms and Trends

Chevron nozzles currently offer one of the most feasible methods of reducing jet exhaust noise in medium to high-bypass turbofan engines. Tests were conducted in the University of Cincinnati Nozzle Acoustic Test Facility, simulating a separate flow exhaust system to provide insight into some of the basic mechanisms and trends of this emerging technology. For this study, a baseline inner nozzle and three chevron nozzles were tested over a wide range of operating conditions, including dual and single flow. Chevrons with varying numbers of lobes and levels of penetration were selected for this study to provide insight into the impact of these geometric parameters on the noise level. Spectral and directivity results from heated, coaxial flow tests showed that the chevron nozzles are most effective at lower frequencies and at aft directivity angles. Reductions in overall sound pressure level (SPL) ranging from 3 to 6 dB were documented. Calculations of perceived noise level directivity also showed 4-6 dB reduction at aft angles. The data also illustrated clear and consistent trends with respect to the chevron geometric parameters. Specifically, the chevron penetration was determined to be a primary factor in controlling the tradeoff between low-frequency reduction and high-frequency SPL increases. Although slight differences were observed with varying chevron lobe numbers at a fixed penetration, it appears that the effect is less significant than the penetration. Finally, the data indicated clear dependence of the chevron benefit on the velocity difference between the inner and outer streams.

[1]  J. Seiner,et al.  On the Two Components of Turbulent Mixing Noise from Supersonic Jets , 1996 .

[2]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  Aeroacoustics of Turbulent Jets: Flow Structure, Noise Sources, and Control , 2006 .

[3]  Christopher K. W. Tam,et al.  SUPERSONIC JET NOISE , 1995 .

[4]  Christopher K. W. Tam,et al.  Jet Noise: Since 1952 , 1998 .

[5]  James Bridges,et al.  TABS AND MIXERS FOR RE UClNG LOW BYPASS RATIO JET NOISE , 1999 .

[6]  H. S. Ribner,et al.  Refraction of Sound from a Point Source Placed in an Air Jet , 1965 .

[7]  C. Tam,et al.  Subsonic Jet Noise from Nonaxisymmetric and Tabbed Nozzles , 2000 .

[8]  James M. Fields,et al.  Human response to aircraft noise , 1991 .

[9]  M. Salikuddin,et al.  Experimental study for multi-lobed mixer high bypass exhaust systems for subsonic jet noise reduction. II - Acoustic results , 1999 .

[10]  L. J. S. Bradbury,et al.  The distortion of a jet by tabs , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Kevin Massey,et al.  An evaluation of various concepts of reducing supersonic jet noise , 1990 .

[12]  James Bridges,et al.  Acoustics and Trust of Separate-Flow Exhaust Nozzles With Mixing Devices for High-Bypass-Ratio Engines , 2000 .

[13]  K. Ahuja,et al.  Shear flow control by mechanical tabs , 1989 .

[14]  Mark F. Reeder,et al.  Effect of tabs on the flow and noise field of an axisymmetric jet , 1993 .

[15]  Paul J Strykowski,et al.  The role of streamwise vortices on the sound generation of supersonic jets , 1993 .

[16]  J. F. Brausch,et al.  Jet Noise Suppression , 1991 .

[17]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[18]  Krishna Viswanathan,et al.  Jet Aeroacoustic Testing: Issues and Implications , 2003 .

[19]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  The design and validation of a coaxial nozzle acoustic test facility , 2002 .

[20]  J. E. Ffowcs Williams,et al.  The noise from turbulence convected at high speed , 1963, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.