Evaluating Transportation User Costs Based on Simulated Regional Network Models

Bridges are important infrastructure and essential components of a transportation network. Temporary, long-term, and partial closures of bridges can result in enormous cost implications. However, bridge closures are inevitable not only because of the likelihood of hazard-induced damages but also because routine maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation activities may also warrant closures. It is current practice that vehicles are rerouted to the shortest alternative route during bridge closures (the detour approach). In this study, a scenario-based network approach for evaluating the impact of bridge closures on transportation user cost was undertaken and is proposed in this paper. Both the detour-based and network-based approaches were applied to the Tampa Bay, Florida, regional network model, and five bridge closure scenarios were considered. User costs were computed in terms of delay and vehicle operating costs. For closures to the I-275, Gandy, Highway 580, and West Courtney Campbell Causeway bridges, there were increases of about 42%, 18%, 61%, and 45%, respectively, in total user costs for the network-based approach compared with the current detour-only approach. These findings indicate that a significant network impact was captured by the network-based approach. The proposed method captures the effects of bridge closures on all road segments within the regional network jurisdiction; provides a more rigid framework for analysis by ensuring that user costs are computed efficiently but without overestimation; takes into account that road users may have advance knowledge of roadway conditions before trips and that this knowledge may significantly influence route choices; and provides sufficient information for agencies to implement preemptive measures to cater for network-level disruptions attributable to bridge closures.

[1]  John O Sobanjo,et al.  Enhancement of the FDOT's project level and network level bridge management analysis tools , 2011 .

[2]  Patrick DeCorla- Souza,et al.  Total cost analysis: An alternative to benefit-cost analysis in evaluating transportation alternatives , 1997 .

[3]  Todd Litman,et al.  Evaluating Transportation Equity Guidance For Incorporating Distributional Impacts in Transportation Planning , 2015 .

[4]  Kumares C. Sinha,et al.  TOOLS FOR BRIDGE MANAGEMENT DATA ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[5]  Nikola Tanasić,et al.  Vulnerability Assessment of Bridges Exposed to Scour , 2013 .

[6]  Kumares C. Sinha,et al.  Methodology to Estimate User Costs in Indiana Bridge Management System , 1997 .

[7]  D W Johnston,et al.  DEVELOPING USER COSTS FOR BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS , 1993 .

[8]  A. Nicholson,et al.  Risk and Impact of Natural Hazards on a Road Network , 2001 .

[9]  Paul D Thompson,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF USER COST DATA FOR FLORIDA'S BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM , 1999 .

[10]  Gary Barnes,et al.  Per Mile Costs of Operating Automobiles and Trucks , 2004 .

[11]  Feng Xie,et al.  Evaluating the effects of the I-35W bridge collapse on road-users in the twin cities metropolitan region , 2008 .

[12]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  Causes and cures of highway congestion , 2001 .

[13]  D. Murray,et al.  An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking: 2017 Update , 2014 .

[14]  Samuel Labi,et al.  Transportation Decision Making: Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming , 2007 .

[15]  J. Mallela,et al.  Work Zone Road User Costs: Concepts and Applications , 2011 .

[16]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Vulnerability Assessment Methodology for Swiss Road Network , 2009 .

[17]  Samuel Labi,et al.  Bridge user cost estimation – a synthesis of existing methods and addressing the issues of multiple counting, workzones and traffic capacity limitation , 2011 .

[18]  Dan Murray,et al.  Analysis of Operational Costs of Trucking , 2008 .