Sorghum hot water extract : influence of grain physico-chemical characteristics

Traditionally, barley is the preferred cereal for traditional lager brewing. The use of sorghum for the production of European-style lager beers has recently been recognised. The use of sorghum as brewing adjunct could be a major socio-economic advantage in the developing countries in Africa. Limitations for its use, however, include its low amylolytic potential, high gelatinization temperatures, and the presence of tannins. Adjuncts are often combined with cereal malt during the brewing process to provide extra sources of fermentable carbohydrates. As with all cereals, the functional properties of sorghum grains are influenced by their physico-chemical characteristics. It is therefore critical to understand the structure, chemistry and functionality of the sorghum cultivar(s) considered for use as brewing adjuncts. Hot water extract describes the quality of the wort of an adjunct and depicts the amount of starch that was solubilised during mashing. The determination of hot water extract is expensive, laborious and time-consuming. The provision of a possible predictive marker(s) for sorghum hot water extract that is less complicated to determine, could be of great economical value to the brewer. Hot water extract was determined for 43 sorghum cultivars and then compared to various physico-chemical characteristics. Sorghum endosperm texture was visually determined. Suspensions of whole sorghum flour were pasted using a Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) with an extended heating cycle. Significant negative correlations were obtained between extract content and pasting temperature and time in corneous endosperm samples. There was also a significant positive relationship between tannin-free sorghums and peak viscosity in pasted samples. Protein contents of 10 different sorghums were compared to their hot water extracts, where there was a significant negative relationship between these characteristics. Protein content could be used successfully as a predictive marker for extract. No significant relationship could be established between sorghum hot water extract and starch content. Tannin-containing sorghum cultivars gave significantly lower extracts and had higher malt diastatic power (DP) than non-tannin cultivars. There was no significant relationship between the DP and extract content of non-tannin sorghums. When only non-tannin sorghum cultivars that pasted were subjected to principal component analysis, it seemed that a positive relationship existed between peak viscosity and extract content. Low protein sorghum cultivars with no tannins and corneous endosperm would be suitable for use as brewing adjuncts. Protein content, the presence of tannins, endosperm texture and peak viscosity could be used as predictive markers for sorghum hot water extract © 2010, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written…

[1]  L. Copeland,et al.  Amylolysis of wheat starches. II. degradation patterns of native starch granules with varying functional properties. , 2010 .

[2]  P. Kuchel,et al.  Digestion of starch: In vivo and in vitro kinetic models used to characterise oligosaccharide or glucose release , 2010 .

[3]  J. Pedersen,et al.  Digestibility of protein and starch from sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) is linked to biochemical and structural features of grain endosperm , 2009 .

[4]  K. Duodu,et al.  Influence of Cooking Conditions on the Protein Matrix of Sorghum and Maize Endosperm Flours , 2008 .

[5]  A. Salgó,et al.  Pasting Behavior of Amylose, Amylopectin and Their Mixtures as Determined by RVA Curves and First Derivatives , 2008 .

[6]  R. Letsididi,et al.  Evaluation of Indigenous Botswana Sorghum Cultivars with Respect to Their Diastatic Power, α-Amylase, β-Amylase, and Limit Dextrinase Potentials for Malting , 2008 .

[7]  R. Driscoll,et al.  Effect of Degree of Gelatinisation on the Rheology and Rehydration Kinetics of Instant Rice Produced by Freeze Drying , 2007 .

[8]  J. Hounhouigan,et al.  Impact of brewing process operations on phytate, phenolic compounds and in vitro solubility of iron and zinc in opaque sorghum beer , 2007 .

[9]  S. Bean,et al.  Novel food and non-food uses for sorghum and millets. , 2006 .

[10]  L. Rooney,et al.  Sorghum and millet phenols and antioxidants , 2006 .

[11]  I. O. Adewale,et al.  Comparative studies on α-amylases from malted maize (Zea mays), millet (Eleusine coracana) and Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) , 2006 .

[12]  B. Hamaker,et al.  Distinctive Sorghum Starch Granule Morphologies Appear to Improve Raw Starch Digestibility , 2006 .

[13]  R. Agu,et al.  Quality Assessment of Different Sorghum Varieties for Their Brewing Potential , 2006 .

[14]  H. Depypere,et al.  Antiinvasive effect of xanthohumol, a prenylated chalcone present in hops (Humulus lupulus L.) and beer , 2005, International journal of cancer.

[15]  John R. N. Taylor,et al.  Optimising the determination of maize endosperm vitreousness by a rapid non‐destructive image analysis technique , 2004 .

[16]  David Del Pozo-Insfran,et al.  Effect of Amyloglucosidase on Wort Composition and Fermentable Carbohydrate Depletion in Sorghum Lager Beers , 2004 .

[17]  I. Delgadillo,et al.  Effect of Grain Structure and Cooking on Sorghum and Maize in vitro Protein Digestibility , 2002 .

[18]  J. Okpuzor,et al.  Enzymic recovery of extract from cold trub derived from brewing with un-malted sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) , 2002 .

[19]  R. Agu,et al.  A Comparison of Maize, Sorghum and Barley as Brewing Adjuncts , 2002 .

[20]  J. Dewar,et al.  Developments in sorghum food technologies. , 2001, Advances in food and nutrition research.

[21]  G. Zacchi,et al.  A kinetic model for enzymatic wheat starch saccharification , 2000 .

[22]  W. Eigel,et al.  Duration of kilning treatment on α-amylase, β-amylase and endo-(1,3)(1,4)-β-d-glucanase activity of malted sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) , 1999 .

[23]  A. Eliasson,et al.  The influence of amylose and amylopectin characteristics on gelatinization and retrogradation properties of different starches , 1998 .

[24]  J. J. Alvarado-Gil,et al.  Effects of Starch Gelatinisation on the Thermal, Dielectric and Rheological Properties of Extruded Corn Masa , 1998 .

[25]  R. Agu,et al.  Short communication: Brewing properties of Nigerian white and yellow malted sorghum varieties mashed with external enzymes , 1995, World journal of microbiology & biotechnology.

[26]  John R. N. Taylor,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING BETA-AMYLASE ACTIVITY IN SORGHUM MALT , 1993 .

[27]  W. R. Morrison,et al.  Swelling and gelatinization of cereal starches. IV. Some effects of lipid-complexed amylose and free amylose in waxy and normal barley starches , 1993 .

[28]  A. Chandrashekar,et al.  Effects of cooking and treatment with sodium bisulfite on in vitro protein digestibility and microstructure of sorghum flour , 1992 .

[29]  R. Agu,et al.  Studies on beer production from Nigerian millet , 1991 .

[30]  A. Chandrashekar,et al.  Influence of protein on starch gelatinization in sorghum. , 1988 .

[31]  E. Mertz,et al.  Digestibility of sorghum proteins. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  K. H. Daiber Enzyme inhibition by polyphenols of sorghum grain and malt , 1975 .

[33]  A. B. Davis,et al.  Pericarp and endosperm structure of sorghum grain shown by scanning electron microscopy , 1974 .

[34]  A. P. Mathers Methods of Analysis of the American Society of Brewing Chemists , 1959 .

[35]  F. C. Blanck Agricultural and Food Chemistry. , 1951 .