Measurement of diffusion of fluorescent compounds and autofluorescence in skin in vivo using a confocal instrument

Using compact and affordable instrumentation based upon fluorescent confocal imaging we have tracked the movement of autofluorescent compounds through skin in near real time with high temporal and spatial resolution and sensitivity. The ability to measure the diffusion of compounds through skin with such resolution plays an important role for applications such as monitoring the penetration of pharmaceuticals applied to skin and assessing the integrity of the skin barrier. Several measurement methods exist, but they suffer from a number of problems such as being slow, expensive, non-portable and lacking sensitivity. To address these issues, we adapted a technique that we previously developed for tracking fluorescent compounds in the eye to measure the autofluorescence and the diffusion of externally applied fluorescent compounds in skin in vivo. Results are presented that show the change in autofluorescence of the volar forearm over the course of a week. We furthermore demonstrate the ability of the instrument to measure the diffusion speed and depth of externally applied fluorescent compounds both in healthy skin and after the skin barrier function has been perturbed. The instrument is currently being developed further for increased sensitivity and multi-wavelength excitation. We believe that the presented instrument is suitable for a large number of applications in fields such as assessment of damage to the skin barrier, development of topical and systemic medication and tracking the diffusion of fluorescent compounds through skin constructs as well as monitoring effects of skin products and general consumer products which may come into contact with the skin.

[1]  K. Madison,et al.  Barrier function of the skin: "la raison d'être" of the epidermis. , 2003, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[2]  A. Vaughan,et al.  On optical depth profiling using confocal Raman spectroscopy , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[3]  Nancy A. Monteiro-Riviere,et al.  Use of confocal microscopy for nanoparticle drug delivery through skin , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[4]  Cevc,et al.  Non‐uniform cellular packing of the stratum corneum and permeability barrier function of intact skin: a high‐resolution confocal laser scanning microscopy study using highly deformable vesicles (Transfersomes) , 1998, The British journal of dermatology.

[5]  S Kezic,et al.  Methods for measuring in-vivo percutaneous absorption in humans , 2008, Human & experimental toxicology.

[6]  E. Winer,et al.  Adherence to therapy with oral antineoplastic agents. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  J. Lademann,et al.  Comparison of in vivo and ex vivo laser scanning microscopy and multiphoton tomography application for human and porcine skin imaging , 2014 .

[8]  V. Meidan,et al.  Methods for quantitative determination of drug localized in the skin. , 1998, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[9]  Hans Christian Wulf,et al.  Autofluorescence spectrum of skin: component bands and body site variations , 2000, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[10]  John M. Girkin,et al.  Measurement and quantification of fluorescent changes in ocular tissue using a novel confocal instrument , 2014, Photonics Europe.

[11]  Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Reflectance confocal microscopy--state-of-art and research overview. , 2009, Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery.

[12]  R. Gans,et al.  Simple non-invasive assessment of advanced glycation endproduct accumulation , 2004, Diabetologia.

[13]  I. Riemann,et al.  In vivo Drug Screening in Human Skin Using Femtosecond Laser Multiphoton Tomography , 2006, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[14]  Mortazavi,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S13 Tables S1 to S3 References Label-free Biomedical Imaging with High Sensitivity by Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy , 2022 .

[15]  Milind Rajadhyaksha,et al.  Skin imaging with reflectance confocal microscopy. , 2008, Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery.

[16]  T. Baillie,et al.  Is the role of the small intestine in first-pass metabolism overemphasized? , 1999, Pharmacological reviews.

[17]  J. Serup,et al.  Guidelines on sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure tests , 1997, Contact dermatitis.

[18]  H. Bruining,et al.  In vivo confocal Raman microspectroscopy of the skin: noninvasive determination of molecular concentration profiles. , 2001, The Journal of investigative dermatology.