Sexual and social stimuli elicit rapid and contrasting genomic responses

Sensory physiology has been shown to influence female mate choice, yet little is known about the mechanisms within the brain that regulate this critical behaviour. Here we examine preference behaviour of 58 female swordtails, Xiphophorus nigrensis, in four different social environments (attractive and unattractive males, females only, non-attractive males only and asocial conditions) followed by neural gene expression profiling. We used a brain-specific cDNA microarray to identify patterns of genomic response and candidate genes, followed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) examination of gene expression with variation in behaviour. Our microarray results revealed patterns of genomic response differing more between classes of social stimuli than between presence versus absence of stimuli. We identified suites of genes showing diametrically opposed patterns of expression: genes that are turned ‘on’ while females interact with attractive males are turned ‘off’ when interacting with other females, and vice versa. Our qPCR results identified significant predictive relationships between five candidate genes and specific mate choice behaviours (preference and receptivity) across females exposed to males, with no significant patterns identified in female or asocial conditions or with overall locomotor activity. The identification of stimulus- and behaviour-specific responses opens an exciting window into the molecular pathways associated with social behaviour and mechanisms that underlie sexual selection.

[1]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[2]  E. Jarvis,et al.  Rapid Behavioral and Genomic Responses to Social Opportunity , 2005, PLoS biology.

[3]  Hans A Hofmann,et al.  Biologically meaningful expression profiling across species using heterologous hybridization to a cDNA microarray , 2004, BMC Genomics.

[4]  A. Quesada,et al.  Mechanisms of Ovarian Steroid Regulation of Norepinephrine Receptor-Mediated Signal Transduction in the Hypothalamus: Implications for Female Reproductive Physiology , 2001, Hormones and Behavior.

[5]  R. Cassens,et al.  Comparison of Ribogreen ® and 18s Rrna Quantitation for Normalizing Real-time Rt-pcr Expression Analysis , 2022 .

[6]  S. Balshine,et al.  Masculinized dominant females in a cooperatively breeding species , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[7]  D. Franck Sex, Color, and Mate Choice in Guppies , 2000 .

[8]  R. Greenspan,et al.  Natural behavior polymorphism due to a cGMP-dependent protein kinase of Drosophila. , 1997, Science.

[9]  Gerhard Quinkert,et al.  Variation and Selection , 2014, The New Behaviorism.

[10]  Terry Speed,et al.  Normalization of cDNA microarray data. , 2003, Methods.

[11]  K. Martin,et al.  Importin-mediated nuclear transport in neurons , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  M. Ryan,et al.  Social cues shift functional connectivity in the hypothalamus. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  D. Pfaff,et al.  Estradiol differentially regulates lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase transcript levels in the rodent brain: Evidence from high-density oligonucleotide arrays and in situ hybridization , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Molly E Cummings,et al.  A private ultraviolet channel in visual communication , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Larry J. Young,et al.  Enhanced partner preference in a promiscuous species by manipulating the expression of a single gene , 2004, Nature.

[16]  William E. Wagner,et al.  Sexual selection on alleles that determine body size in the swordtail Xiphophorus nigrensis , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  D. Begun,et al.  A genome-wide analysis of courting and mating responses in Drosophila melanogaster females. , 2004, Genome.

[18]  A. Clark,et al.  Genes Regulated by Mating, Sperm, or Seminal Proteins in Mated Female Drosophila melanogaster , 2004, Current Biology.

[19]  Gregory F Ball,et al.  Response biases in auditory forebrain regions of female songbirds following exposure to sexually relevant variation in male song. , 2001, Journal of neurobiology.

[20]  P. Worley,et al.  Constitutive expression of zif268 in neocortex is regulated by synaptic activity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  K. D. Roeder AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE SEXUAL BEHAVIOR OF THE PRAYING MANTIS (MANTIS RELIGIOSA L.) , 1935 .

[22]  Perikles Simon,et al.  Q-Gene: Processing Quantitative Real-time RT-PCR Data , 2003, Bioinform..

[23]  方福德 构成性表达(constitutive expression) , 2003 .

[24]  S A Bustin,et al.  Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. , 2002, Journal of molecular endocrinology.

[25]  M. Ryan,et al.  8. Variation and Selection in Swordtails , 2002 .

[26]  S. Chenoweth,et al.  Dissecting the complex genetic basis of mate choice , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[27]  P. Sonderegger,et al.  Neuronal Depolarization Enhances the Transcription of the Neuronal Serine Protease Inhibitor Neuroserpin , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience.

[28]  P. Scheiffele,et al.  Control of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapse Formation by Neuroligins , 2005, Science.

[29]  T. Mackay,et al.  Quantitative genetic analyses of complex behaviours in Drosophila , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[30]  G. Robinson,et al.  Gene Expression Profiles in the Brain Predict Behavior in Individual Honey Bees , 2003, Science.

[31]  Colin D. Meiklejohn,et al.  Sex-Dependent Gene Expression and Evolution of the Drosophila Transcriptome , 2003, Science.

[32]  Y. Heifetz,et al.  Mating-responsive genes in reproductive tissues of female Drosophila melanogaster , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  E. Valenstein,et al.  Sexual Receptivity: Facilitation by Medial Preoptic Lesions in Female Rats , 1972, Science.

[34]  P. Sonderegger,et al.  Expression of Neuroserpin, an Inhibitor of Tissue Plasminogen Activator, in the Developing and Adult Nervous System of the Mouse , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  A. Houde The effects of female choice and male-male competition on the mating success of male guppies , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  D. Hartl,et al.  Bayesian analysis of gene expression levels: statistical quantification of relative mRNA level across multiple strains or treatments , 2002, Genome Biology.

[37]  C. Landry,et al.  Alternative life histories shape brain gene expression profiles in males of the same population , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  M. Ryan,et al.  Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus , 1990, Nature.

[39]  J. Malone,et al.  Gene expression polymorphism in Drosophila populations , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[40]  A. Akhmedov,et al.  Impaired explorative behavior and neophobia in genetically modified mice lacking or overexpressing the extracellular serine protease inhibitor neuroserpin , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience.

[41]  T. Mackay,et al.  Genetics and genomics of Drosophila mating behavior , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Timothy Q Gentner,et al.  Recent experience modulates forebrain gene–expression in response to mate–choice cues in European starlings , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  T. Insel,et al.  Increased affiliative response to vasopressin in mice expressing the V1a receptor from a monogamous vole , 1999, Nature.

[44]  M. Cummings,et al.  Repeatability and consistency of female preference behaviours in a northern swordtail, Xiphophorus nigrensis , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[46]  J. Endler Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes , 1983, Environmental Biology of Fishes.