In-field High Throughput Phenotyping and Cotton Plant Growth Analysis Using LiDAR

Plant breeding programs and a wide range of plant science applications would greatly benefit from the development of in-field high throughput phenotyping technologies. In this study, a terrestrial LiDAR-based high throughput phenotyping system was developed. A 2D LiDAR was applied to scan plants from overhead in the field, and an RTK-GPS was used to provide spatial coordinates. Precise 3D models of scanned plants were reconstructed based on the LiDAR and RTK-GPS data. The ground plane of the 3D model was separated by RANSAC algorithm and a Euclidean clustering algorithm was applied to remove noise generated by weeds. After that, clean 3D surface models of cotton plants were obtained, from which three plot-level morphologic traits including canopy height, projected canopy area, and plant volume were derived. Canopy height ranging from 85th percentile to the maximum height were computed based on the histogram of the z coordinate for all measured points; projected canopy area was derived by projecting all points on a ground plane; and a Trapezoidal rule based algorithm was proposed to estimate plant volume. Results of validation experiments showed good agreement between LiDAR measurements and manual measurements for maximum canopy height, projected canopy area, and plant volume, with R2-values of 0.97, 0.97, and 0.98, respectively. The developed system was used to scan the whole field repeatedly over the period from 43 to 109 days after planting. Growth trends and growth rate curves for all three derived morphologic traits were established over the monitoring period for each cultivar. Overall, four different cultivars showed similar growth trends and growth rate patterns. Each cultivar continued to grow until ~88 days after planting, and from then on varied little. However, the actual values were cultivar specific. Correlation analysis between morphologic traits and final yield was conducted over the monitoring period. When considering each cultivar individually, the three traits showed the best correlations with final yield during the period between around 67 and 109 days after planting, with maximum R2-values of up to 0.84, 0.88, and 0.85, respectively. The developed system demonstrated relatively high throughput data collection and analysis.

[1]  A. Escolà,et al.  Ultrasonic and LIDAR Sensors for Electronic Canopy Characterization in Vineyards: Advances to Improve Pesticide Application Methods , 2011, Sensors.

[2]  J. Xue,et al.  QTL mapping for leaf area in maize (Zea mays L.) under multi-environments , 2017 .

[3]  Martin Trtílek,et al.  High-Throughput Non-destructive Phenotyping of Traits that Contribute to Salinity Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[4]  Yuhua Jiao,et al.  Functional approach to high-throughput plant growth analysis , 2013, BMC Systems Biology.

[5]  Jose A. Jiménez-Berni,et al.  Proximal Remote Sensing Buggies and Potential Applications for Field-Based Phenotyping , 2014 .

[6]  M. Bange,et al.  The yield potential of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) , 2015 .

[7]  Ulrich Schurr,et al.  Phenotyping in the fields: dissecting the genetics of quantitative traits and digital farming. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[8]  Sebastian Riedel,et al.  Automated Analysis of Barley Organs Using 3D Laser Scanning: An Approach for High Throughput Phenotyping , 2014, Sensors.

[9]  Erik H. Murchie,et al.  Crop Radiation Capture and Use Efficiency , 2019, Crop Science.

[10]  G. Ritchie,et al.  Contribution of Boll Mass and Boll Number to Irrigated Cotton Yield , 2015 .

[11]  A. Greenberg,et al.  Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[12]  Wei Guo,et al.  High-Throughput Phenotyping of Sorghum Plant Height Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Its Application to Genomic Prediction Modeling , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[13]  Qin Zhang,et al.  A Review of Imaging Techniques for Plant Phenotyping , 2014, Sensors.

[14]  D. Tilman,et al.  Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  J. L. Monteith,et al.  Validity of the correlation between intercepted radiation and biomass , 1994 .

[16]  Glen L. Ritchie,et al.  Cotton growth and development , 2007 .

[17]  Richard F. Davis,et al.  Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation use efficiency and yield of maize , 2003 .

[18]  A. Escolà,et al.  Obtaining the three-dimensional structure of tree orchards from remote 2D terrestrial LIDAR scanning , 2009 .

[19]  K. Omasa,et al.  Estimation of vertical plant area density profiles in a rice canopy at different growth stages by high-resolution portable scanning lidar with a lightweight mirror , 2012 .

[20]  C. Klukas,et al.  Advanced phenotyping and phenotype data analysis for the study of plant growth and development , 2015, Front. Plant Sci..

[21]  Hamid Moghadas,et al.  A new approach to calculate Plant Area Density (PAD) using 3D ground-based lidar , 2016, Remote Sensing.

[22]  A. Walter,et al.  Terrestrial 3D laser scanning to track the increase in canopy height of both monocot and dicot crop species under field conditions , 2016, Plant Methods.

[23]  T. Sharkey,et al.  The relationship between leaf area growth and biomass accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2015, Front. Plant Sci..

[24]  Dóra Szakonyi,et al.  LEAFDATA: a literature-curated database for Arabidopsis leaf development , 2016, Plant Methods.

[25]  Christopher N. Topp,et al.  Applying high-throughput phenotyping to plant-insect interactions: picturing more resistant crops. , 2015, Current opinion in insect science.

[26]  M. Liu,et al.  A high-throughput stereo-imaging system for quantifying rape leaf traits during the seedling stage , 2017, Plant Methods.

[27]  J. Fripp,et al.  A novel mesh processing based technique for 3D plant analysis , 2012, BMC Plant Biology.

[28]  Peter Biber,et al.  Plant detection and mapping for agricultural robots using a 3D LIDAR sensor , 2011, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[29]  S. Chapman,et al.  Dynamic quantification of canopy structure to characterize early plant vigour in wheat genotypes , 2016, Journal of experimental botany.

[30]  J. Reif,et al.  Precision phenotyping of biomass accumulation in triticale reveals temporal genetic patterns of regulation , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[31]  Marco Bietresato,et al.  Evaluation of a LiDAR-based 3D-stereoscopic vision system for crop-monitoring applications , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[32]  Paolo Remagnino,et al.  Computational Botany: Methods for Automated Species Identification , 2016 .

[33]  J. Monteith Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .

[34]  Nico Blodow,et al.  Towards 3D Point cloud based object maps for household environments , 2008, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[35]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Mood States and Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review , 1985 .

[36]  Sanjiv Singh,et al.  Automated Visual Yield Estimation in Vineyards , 2014, J. Field Robotics.

[37]  Yu Jiang,et al.  High throughput phenotyping of cotton plant height using depth images under field conditions , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[38]  I. Bancroft,et al.  Development of an efficient glucosinolate extraction method , 2017, Plant Methods.

[39]  C. Stöckle,et al.  Chapter 7 – Crop Radiation Capture and Use Efficiency: A Framework for Crop Growth Analysis , 2009 .

[40]  David Reiser,et al.  3-D Imaging Systems for Agricultural Applications—A Review , 2016, Sensors.

[41]  M. Tester,et al.  Phenomics--technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. , 2011, Trends in plant science.

[42]  A. Raftery,et al.  World population stabilization unlikely this century , 2014, Science.

[43]  Armin B. Cremers,et al.  In-field cotton detection via region-based semantic image segmentation , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[44]  D. Inzé,et al.  Cell to whole-plant phenotyping: the best is yet to come. , 2013, Trends in plant science.

[45]  Jose A. Jiménez-Berni,et al.  Phenomic Approaches and Tools for Phytopathologists. , 2017, Phytopathology.

[46]  J. Léon,et al.  High-precision laser scanning system for capturing 3D plant architecture and analysing growth of cereal plants , 2014 .

[47]  Changying Li,et al.  In-Field High-Throughput Phenotyping of Cotton Plant Height Using LiDAR , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[48]  Glen L. Ritchie,et al.  High‐Throughput Phenotyping of Cotton in Multiple Irrigation Environments , 2015 .

[49]  Michael P. Pound,et al.  Approaches to three-dimensional reconstruction of plant shoot topology and geometry. , 2016, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[50]  Khaled M. Elleithy,et al.  Sensor Fusion Based Model for Collision Free Mobile Robot Navigation , 2015, Sensors.

[51]  R. K. Boman,et al.  Beltwide Evaluation of Commercially Available Plant Growth Regulators , 2010 .

[52]  Johanna A Bac-Molenaar,et al.  Genome-wide association mapping of growth dynamics detects time-specific and general quantitative trait loci , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[53]  Thomas Rath,et al.  Novel image processing approach for solving the overlapping problem in agriculture , 2013 .

[54]  Nelson L. Max,et al.  Structured Light-Based 3D Reconstruction System for Plants , 2015, Sensors.

[55]  Yi Lin,et al.  LiDAR: An important tool for next-generation phenotyping technology of high potential for plant phenomics? , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[56]  D. Ehlert,et al.  Rapid Mapping of the Leaf Area Index in Agricultural Crops , 2011 .

[57]  Juan Feng,et al.  Location of apples in trees using stereoscopic vision , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[58]  Ruixiu Sui,et al.  Cotton Yield Assessment Using Plant Height Mapping System , 2012 .