Managing Production Yields and Rework through Feedback on Speed, Quality, and Quantity

Balancing priorities of production speed and conformance quality is an ongoing challenge in production and operations management. Organizations may emphasize these priorities through various forms of performance feedback. However, the impacts of using feedback to emphasize speed, quality, and quantity remain unclear in production settings. This study employs controlled laboratory experiments to examine the impact of real‐time feedback on production quantities, first time yield percentages, and rework percentages. Drawing on concepts from speed‐accuracy tradeoffs, we study four types of feedback: speed, accuracy, joint speed and accuracy, and yields. Laboratory activities focus on the repetitive task of converting paper‐based medical records to electronic data formats. These tasks are critical inputs to data analytics and are similar in nature to simple independent manufacturing and service tasks. We study feedback effects in a setting critical to practice but rarely studied in research, where workers are incentivized for both speed and quality as they perform production tasks that explicitly allow rework. The results show that production yields worsen under speed feedback but improve under each form of quality‐containing feedback. Results also show that each form of quality‐containing feedback increases the proportion of correctly reworked to produced errors through different mechanisms of increased error fixing, decreased error production, or both.

[1]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[2]  G. Latham,et al.  A Review of Research on the Application of Goal Setting in Organizations , 1975 .

[3]  Senthil K. Veeraraghavan,et al.  Quality-Speed Conundrum: Trade-offs in Customer-Intensive Services , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  When Does the Devil Make Work? An Empirical Study of the Impact of Workload on Worker Productivity , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[5]  T. Connolly,et al.  Goals, strategy development and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting , 1989 .

[6]  R. C. Newman,et al.  ON THE ACQUISITION AND MAINTENANCE OF HIGH SPEED AND HIGH ACCURACY IN A KEYBOARD TASK , 1965 .

[7]  D. G. MacKay The Problems of Flexibility, Fluency, and Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Skilled Behavior. , 1982 .

[8]  William H. Mobley,et al.  Construct validation of an instrumentality-expectancy-task-goal model of work motivation: Some theoretical boundary conditions. , 1973 .

[9]  Paul Goodwin,et al.  Feedback-labelling synergies in judgmental stock price forecasting , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  John W. Payne,et al.  Effort and Accuracy in Choice , 1985 .

[11]  Alan G. Robinson,et al.  ON THE TABLETOP IMPROVEMENT EXPERIMENTS OF JAPAN , 1994 .

[12]  P. Fitts Cognitive aspects of information processing. 3. Set for speed versus accuracy. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[15]  Alexander D. Stajkovic,et al.  Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[16]  R. Pew,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Reaction Time: Effect of Discrete Criterion Times , 1968 .

[17]  John O. McClain,et al.  Overcoming the dark side of worker flexibility , 2003 .

[18]  J. Hattie,et al.  The Power of Feedback , 2007 .

[19]  David E. Irwin,et al.  The dynamics of cognition and action: mental processes inferred from speed-accuracy decomposition. , 1988, Psychological review.

[20]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making ☆ , 2009 .

[21]  E. Thorndike The law of effect. , 1927 .

[22]  John W. Boudreau,et al.  The Effects of Low Inventory on the Development of Productivity Norms , 1999 .

[23]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions , 2006 .

[24]  Peter F. Luckett,et al.  Feedback and management accounting: A review of research into behavioural consequences , 1991 .

[25]  E. Bendoly,et al.  How Excessive Stage Time Reduction in NPD Negatively Impacts Market Value , 2016 .

[26]  Peter Letmathe,et al.  How to learn new tasks: Shop floor performance effects of knowledge transfer and performance feedback , 2012 .

[27]  Dent,et al.  Cognitive Load and the Equality Heuristic: A Two-Stage Model of Resource Overconsumption in Small Groups. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[28]  E. Bendoly Real-time feedback and booking behavior in the hospitality industry: Moderating the balance between imperfect judgment and imperfect prescription , 2013 .

[29]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Enhancing the Motivational Affordance of Information Systems: The Effects of Real-Time Performance Feedback and Goal Setting in Group Collaboration Environments , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[30]  A V Reed,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Recognition Memory , 1973, Science.

[31]  David A. Nadler,et al.  The effects of feedback on task group behavior: A review of the experimental research , 1979 .

[32]  Kenneth L. Schultz,et al.  Bodies of Knowledge for Research in Behavioral Operations , 2009 .

[33]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  Learning-by-Doing in the Newsvendor Problem: A Laboratory Investigation of the Role of Experience and Feedback , 2008, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[34]  W. C. Howell,et al.  Information processing under contradictory instructional sets. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  Tom Meyvis,et al.  Increasing the Power of Your Study by Increasing the Effect Size , 2018 .

[36]  Gerard H. Seijts,et al.  The effects of proximal and distal goals on performance on a moderately complex task , 1999 .

[37]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Towards a Theory of Competitive Progression: Evidence from High‐Tech Manufacturing , 2004 .

[38]  A. Kluger,et al.  Feedback Interventions , 1998 .

[39]  A. Osman,et al.  On the locus of speed-accuracy trade-off in reaction time: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  Vandra L. Huber,et al.  The Interplay of Goals and Promises of Pay-for-Performance on Individual and Group Performance: An Operant Interpretation , 1985 .

[41]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.

[42]  Jens Förster,et al.  Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? , 2003 .

[43]  David R. Vinson,et al.  Closing the Productivity Gap: Improving Worker Productivity Through Public Relative Performance Feedback and Validation of Best Practices , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[44]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs , 2006 .

[45]  Katherine A. Karl,et al.  The impact of feedback and self-efficacy on performance in training. , 1993 .

[46]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[47]  D. Hale Speed-error tradeoff in a three-choice serial reaction task. , 1969 .

[48]  W. Edwards,et al.  Response strategies in a two-choice reaction task with a continuous cost for time , 1971 .

[49]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  Metrics and performance measurement in operations management: dealing with the metrics maze , 2004 .

[50]  A. Diederich,et al.  Modeling the effects of payoff on response bias in a perceptual discrimination task: Bound-change, drift-rate-change, or two-stage-processing hypothesis , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  George S. Easton,et al.  Tradeoffs in Manufacturing? A Meta‐Analysis and Critique of the Literature , 2010 .

[52]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Application of Goal Setting to Sports , 1985 .