Mapping the hand, foot and face representations in the primary motor cortex — Retest reliability of neuronavigated TMS versus functional MRI

INTRODUCTION Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a frequently used non-invasive mapping technique for investigating the human motor system. Recently, neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has been established as an alternative approach. We here compared the test-retest reliability of both mapping techniques with regard to the cortical representations of the hand, leg, face and tongue areas. METHODS Ten healthy subjects were examined three times (intervals: 3-5days/21-35days) with fMRI and nTMS. Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis, plantaris, mentalis and the tongue muscles. The same muscles were activated in an fMRI motor task. Euclidean distances (ED) between hotspots and centers of gravity (CoG) were computed for the respective somatotopic representations. Furthermore, spatial reliability was tested by intersession overlap volumes (OV) and voxel-wise intraclass correlations (ICC). RESULTS Feasibility of fMRI was 100% for all body parts and sessions. In contrast, nTMS was feasible in all sessions and subjects only for the hand area, while mappings of the foot (90%), face (70%) and tongue representations (40%) remained incomplete in several subjects due to technical constraints and co-stimulation artifacts. On average, the mean ED of the hotspots was better for fMRI (6.2±1.1mm) compared to nTMS (10.8±1.9mm) while stability of CoG was similar for both methods. Peak voxel reliability (ICC) was high for both methods (>0.8), and there was no influence of inter-session intervals. In contrast, the reliability of mapping the spatial extent of the hand, foot, lips and tongue representations was poor to moderate for both fMRI and nTMS (OVs and ICC<50%). Especially nTMS mappings of the face and tongue areas yielded poor reliability estimates. CONCLUSION Both methods are highly reliable when mapping the core region of a given target muscle, especially for the hand representation area. In contrast, mapping the spatial extent of a cortical representation area was only little reliable for both nTMS and fMRI. In summary, fMRI was better suited when mapping motor representations of the head, while nTMS showed equal reliability for mapping the hand and foot representation areas. Hence, both methods may well complement each other.

[1]  J. Pekar,et al.  Whole-brain functional mapping with isotropic MR imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[2]  Massimo Filippi,et al.  Reproducibility of fMRI in the clinical setting: Implications for trial designs , 2008, NeuroImage.

[3]  Esa Mervaala,et al.  Motor Potentials Evoked by Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Healthy Subjects , 2008, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[4]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Spatial congruence of neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional neuroimaging , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Navigated Brain Stimulation for Preoperative Cortical Mapping in Paretic Patients: Case Report of a Hemiplegic Patient , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[6]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Effects of volitional contraction on intracortical inhibition and facilitation in the human motor cortex , 2008, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  Catherine J. Stoodley,et al.  Evidence for topographic organization in the cerebellum of motor control versus cognitive and affective processing , 2010, Cortex.

[8]  Esa Mervaala,et al.  Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials , 2009, NeuroImage.

[9]  Volkmar Glauche,et al.  Dynamic gray matter changes within cortex and striatum after short motor skill training are associated with their increased functional interaction , 2012, NeuroImage.

[10]  M. Hallett,et al.  Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  A. Thielscher,et al.  Determining the cortical target of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[12]  Randy L. Gollub,et al.  Test–retest study of fMRI signal change evoked by electroacupuncture stimulation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[13]  V. Santilli,et al.  Reliability of TMS-related measures of tibialis anterior muscle in patients with chronic stroke and healthy subjects , 2011, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[14]  Nikos Logothetis,et al.  Can current fMRI techniques reveal the micro-architecture of cortex? , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  G. Glover,et al.  Physiological noise in oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Interaction between intracortical inhibition and facilitation in human motor cortex. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  M. Hepp-Reymond,et al.  Reproducibility of primary motor cortex somatotopy under controlled conditions. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  Gregory G. Brown,et al.  r Human Brain Mapping 29:958–972 (2008) r Test–Retest and Between-Site Reliability in a Multicenter fMRI Study , 2022 .

[19]  V. Santilli,et al.  Reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation-related measurements of tibialis anterior muscle in healthy subjects , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  C. Hess.  Die mittels Kortexreizung motorisch evozierten Potentiale (MEP) , 1996 .

[21]  Michael B. Miller,et al.  How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Jonas Svensson,et al.  Investigation of spatial resolution, partial volume effects and smoothing in functional MRI using artificial 3D time series , 2008, NeuroImage.

[23]  G. Fesl,et al.  Is the center of mass (COM) a reliable parameter for the localization of brain function in fMRI? , 2008, European Radiology.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multisubject fMRI Studies and Conjunction Analyses , 1999, NeuroImage.

[25]  H Duffau,et al.  Contribution of intraoperative electrical stimulations in surgery of low grade gliomas: a comparative study between two series without (1985–96) and with (1996–2003) functional mapping in the same institution , 2005, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[26]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Z L Gokaslan,et al.  A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Classical and Bayesian Inference in Neuroimaging: Applications , 2002, NeuroImage.

[29]  L. Cohen,et al.  Neuroplasticity Subserving Motor Skill Learning , 2011, Neuron.

[30]  G Schlaug,et al.  Multimodal output mapping of human central motor representation on different spatial scales , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  N. Ramsey,et al.  Neurophysiologic correlates of fMRI in human motor cortex , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[32]  C. Stinear,et al.  Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[34]  R. Cox,et al.  Test-retest precision of functional MR in sensory and motor task activation. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[35]  S. Boniface,et al.  Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: the importance of coil orientation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation--a new tool for functional imaging of the brain. , 1999, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[37]  Eric Achten,et al.  Preoperative fMRI in tumour surgery , 2009, European Radiology.

[38]  E. Seto,et al.  Quantifying Head Motion Associated with Motor Tasks Used in fMRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[39]  L. Portney,et al.  Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice , 2015 .

[40]  E T Bullmore,et al.  Effect of slice orientation on reproducibility of fMRI motor activation at 3 Tesla. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[41]  Nader Pouratian,et al.  The reliability of neuroanatomy as a predictor of eloquence: a review. , 2010, Neurosurgical focus.

[42]  Johannes Mathis,et al.  Motor evoked potentials from masseter muscle induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the pyramidal tract: the importance of coil orientation , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[43]  M. Hallett,et al.  Non-invasive differentiation of motor cortical representation of hand muscles by mapping of optimal current directions. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[44]  H. Brückmann,et al.  Reproducibility of activation in four motor paradigms. An fMRI study. , 2006, Journal of neurology.

[45]  R. Laskawi,et al.  Transcranial Cortical Magnetic Stimulation of Lower-Lip Mimetic Muscles: Effect of Coil Position on Motor Evoked Potentials , 1999, ORL.

[46]  P. Basser,et al.  Focal magnetic stimulation of an axon , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[47]  M Lotze,et al.  Comparison of representational maps using functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[48]  S. S. Ayache,et al.  Comparison of “standard” and “navigated” procedures of TMS coil positioning over motor, premotor and prefrontal targets in patients with chronic pain and depression , 2010, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[49]  Steven L Wolf,et al.  Intra-subject reliability of parameters contributing to maps generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation in able-bodied adults , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[50]  Dietmar Frey,et al.  Preoperative Functional Mapping for Rolandic Brain Tumor Surgery: Comparison of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Direct Cortical Stimulation , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[51]  M. Hallett,et al.  Analogous Corticocortical Inhibition and Facilitation in Ipsilateral and Contralateral Human Motor Cortex Representations of the Tongue , 2001, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[52]  C. Stippich,et al.  Diagnostic benefits of presurgical fMRI in patients with brain tumours in the primary sensorimotor cortex , 2011, European Radiology.

[53]  Makoto Takahashi,et al.  Neural bases of goal-directed implicit learning , 2009, NeuroImage.

[54]  I. Kaufman.  The Cerebral Cortex of Man: A Clinical Study of Localization of Function , 1951 .

[55]  P. Fox,et al.  Column‐based model of electric field excitation of cerebral cortex , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[56]  K. Peck,et al.  Motor and sensory mapping. , 2011, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[57]  M. Ridding,et al.  Stability of Maps of Human Motor Cortex Made with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2004, Brain Topography.

[58]  N. Costes,et al.  Haemodynamic brain responses to acute pain in humans: sensory and attentional networks. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[59]  G. Fink,et al.  Degeneration of corpus callosum and recovery of motor function after stroke: A multimodal magnetic resonance imaging study , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[60]  C. Ingersoll,et al.  INTRA-RATER RELIABILITY OF A TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION TECHNIQUE TO OBTAIN MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIALS , 2008, The International journal of neuroscience.

[61]  M. Hallett,et al.  The role of the human motor cortex in the control of complex and simple finger movement sequences. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[62]  A P Rudell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in study of the visual pathway. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[63]  Johannes Mathis,et al.  Significance of coil orientation for motor evoked potentials from nasalis muscle elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[64]  Enrico Simonotto,et al.  Repeatability of motor and working-memory tasks in healthy older volunteers: assessment at functional MR imaging. , 2004, Radiology.

[65]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[66]  Neil Roberts,et al.  Activation of SI is modulated by attention: a random effects fMRI study using mechanical stimuli , 2007, Neuroreport.

[67]  Ian Marshall,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) reproducibility and variance components across visits and scanning sites with a finger tapping task , 2010, NeuroImage.

[68]  Ivanei E. Bramati,et al.  Functional Expansion of Sensorimotor Representation and Structural Reorganization of Callosal Connections in Lower Limb Amputees , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[69]  I. Delvendahl,et al.  Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation does not decrease the variability of motor-evoked potentials , 2010, Brain Stimulation.

[70]  J. Karhu,et al.  Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2010, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[71]  M. Malcolm,et al.  Reliability of motor cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation in four muscle representations , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[72]  M. de Carvalho,et al.  A new method for reproducible coil positioning in transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[73]  R. Laskawi,et al.  Cortical Representation of the Orbicularis Oculi Muscle as Assessed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) , 2001, The Laryngoscope.

[74]  Peter Vajkoczy,et al.  NAVIGATED TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION FOR PREOPERATIVE FUNCTIONAL DIAGNOSTICS IN BRAIN TUMOR SURGERY , 2009, Neurosurgery.

[75]  P. Basser,et al.  New currents in electrical stimulation of excitable tissues. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[76]  Elizabeth Eisenhauer,et al.  Nomograms for predicting survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: prognostic factor analysis of EORTC and NCIC trial 26981-22981/CE.3. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[77]  Vincent L. Gracco,et al.  Imaging speech production using fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[78]  J L Lancaster,et al.  3D modeling of the total electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation using the boundary element method , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[79]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Striatal activation during acquisition of a cognitive skill. , 1999, Neuropsychology.

[80]  John R. Williams.  The Declaration of Helsinki and public health. , 2008, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[81]  R. Laskawi,et al.  Tongue Representation in the Lateral Cortical Motor Region of the Human Brain as Assessed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2003, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[82]  N Jon Shah,et al.  Assessment of reliability in functional imaging studies , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[83]  G. Schlaug,et al.  The Use of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques to Facilitate Recovery from Post-stroke Aphasia , 2011, Neuropsychology Review.

[84]  Elena Deza,et al.  Encyclopedia of Distances , 2014 .

[85]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[86]  E C Wong,et al.  Comparison of simultaneously measured perfusion and BOLD signal increases during brain activation with T1‐based tissue identification , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[87]  Christian Grefkes,et al.  Functional localization in the human brain: Gradient‐echo, spin‐echo, and arterial spin‐labeling fMRI compared with neuronavigated TMS , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[88]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[89]  R. Turner,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain: data acquisition and analysis , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[90]  M. Hallett,et al.  Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[91]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial brain stimulation: clinical applications and future directions. , 2011, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[92]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus. A new landmark. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[93]  K. Zentgraf,et al.  Cognitive motor processes: The role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations , 2009, Brain Research Reviews.

[94]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[95]  J A Fiez,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of speech an overview of techniques and methodological approaches. , 2001, Journal of communication disorders.

[96]  G. Fink,et al.  Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.