Exploring the Nonconserved Sequence Space of Synthetic Expression Modules in Bacillus subtilis.

Increasing protein expression levels is a key step in the commercial production of enzymes. Predicting promoter activity and translation initiation efficiency based solely on consensus sequences have so far met with mixed results. Here, we addressed this challenge using a "brute-force" approach by designing and synthesizing a large combinatorial library comprising ∼12 000 unique synthetic expression modules (SEMs) for Bacillus subtilis. Using GFP fluorescence as a reporter of gene expression, we obtained a dynamic expression range that spanned 5 orders of magnitude, as well as a maximal 13-fold increase in expression compared with that of the already strong veg expression module. Analyses of the synthetic modules indicated that sequences at the 5'-end of the mRNA were the most important contributing factor to the differences in expression levels, presumably by preventing formation of strong secondary mRNA structures that affect translation initiation. When the gfp coding region was replaced by the coding region of the xynA gene, encoding the industrially relevant B. subtilis xylanase enzyme, only a 3-fold improvement in xylanase production was observed. Moreover, the correlation between GFP and xylanase expression levels was weak. This suggests that the differences in expression levels between the gfp and xynA constructs were due to differences in 5'-end mRNA folding and consequential differences in the rates of translation initiation. Our data show that the use of large libraries of SEMs, in combination with high-throughput technologies, is a powerful approach to improve the production of a specific protein, but that the outcome cannot necessarily be extrapolated to other proteins.

[1]  J. Plotkin,et al.  Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Automated Design of Synthetic Ribosome Binding Sites to Precisely Control Protein Expression , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  Z. Yakhini,et al.  Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Georg Fritz,et al.  The Bacillus BioBrick Box: generation and evaluation of essential genetic building blocks for standardized work with Bacillus subtilis , 2013, Journal of Biological Engineering.

[5]  Sriram Kosuri,et al.  Causes and Effects of N-Terminal Codon Bias in Bacterial Genes , 2013, Science.

[6]  Victor Zhurkin,et al.  A mutant spacer sequence between -35 and -10 elements makes the Plac promoter hyperactive and cAMP receptor protein-independent. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  M. Hecker,et al.  Bacillus subtilis: from soil bacterium to super-secreting cell factory , 2013, Microbial Cell Factories.

[8]  J. Collins,et al.  Synthetic biology devices for in vitro and in vivo diagnostics , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  M. Rao,et al.  Molecular and biotechnological aspects of xylanases. , 1999, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[10]  S. Ishikawa,et al.  Transcriptional, functional and cytochemical analyses of the veg gene in Bacillus subtilis. , 2003, Journal of biochemistry.

[11]  J. V. van Dijl,et al.  Homogeneity and heterogeneity in amylase production by Bacillus subtilis under different growth conditions , 2016, Microbial Cell Factories.

[12]  M. Salas,et al.  Relevance of UP elements for three strong Bacillus subtilis phage phi29 promoters. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  S. Aiyar,et al.  Upstream A-tracts increase bacterial promoter activity through interactions with the RNA polymerase alpha subunit. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  L. Hamoen,et al.  A Novel Feedback Loop That Controls Bimodal Expression of Genetic Competence , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[15]  F. Lienert,et al.  Synthetic biology in mammalian cells: next generation research tools and therapeutics , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[16]  B. Schwikowski,et al.  Condition-Dependent Transcriptome Reveals High-Level Regulatory Architecture in Bacillus subtilis , 2012, Science.

[17]  K. Asai,et al.  Six GTP-binding proteins of the Era/Obg family are essential for cell growth in Bacillus subtilis. , 2002, Microbiology.

[18]  Jette Lengefeld,et al.  The nucleotide composition of the spacer sequence influences the expression yield of heterologously expressed genes in Bacillus subtilis. , 2014, Journal of biotechnology.

[19]  J. D. Helmann,et al.  Compilation and analysis of Bacillus subtilis sigma A-dependent promoter sequences: evidence for extended contact between RNA polymerase and upstream promoter DNA , 1995, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  A. Galizzi,et al.  The UP element of the promoter for the flagellin gene, hag, stimulates transcription from both SigD- and SigA-dependent promoters in Bacillus subtilis , 1998, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[21]  Joseph H. Davis,et al.  Design, construction and characterization of a set of insulated bacterial promoters , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  Jenny Rooke,et al.  Synthetic biology as a source of global health innovation , 2013, Systems and Synthetic Biology.

[23]  H. Salis,et al.  Translation rate is controlled by coupled trade-offs between site accessibility, selective RNA unfolding and sliding at upstream standby sites , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  Oscar P. Kuipers,et al.  Single Cell FRET Analysis for the Identification of Optimal FRET-Pairs in Bacillus subtilis Using a Prototype MEM-FLIM System , 2015, PloS one.

[25]  T. Noll,et al.  Systematic screening of all signal peptides from Bacillus subtilis: a powerful strategy in optimizing heterologous protein secretion in Gram-positive bacteria. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  Masaru Tomita,et al.  Analysis of base-pairing potentials between 16S rRNA and 5' UTR for translation initiation in various prokaryotes , 1999, Bioinform..

[27]  Amin Espah Borujeni,et al.  Translation Initiation is Controlled by RNA Folding Kinetics via a Ribosome Drafting Mechanism. , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  M. Smit,et al.  Secondary structure of the ribosome binding site determines translational efficiency: a quantitative analysis. , 1990 .

[29]  Y. Pilpel,et al.  An Evolutionarily Conserved Mechanism for Controlling the Efficiency of Protein Translation , 2010, Cell.

[30]  J. V. van Dijl,et al.  The CssRS two‐component regulatory system controls a general secretion stress response in Bacillus subtilis , 2006, The FEBS journal.

[31]  O. Kuipers,et al.  Bistability, epigenetics, and bet-hedging in bacteria. , 2008, Annual review of microbiology.

[32]  D. Petranovic,et al.  Tunable promoters in systems biology. , 2005, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[33]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Molecular Systems Biology 9; Article number 675; doi:10.1038/msb.2013.32 Citation: Molecular Systems Biology 9:675 , 2022 .

[34]  W. Schumann,et al.  Development of a strong intracellular expression system for Bacillus subtilis by optimizing promoter elements. , 2012, Journal of biotechnology.

[35]  H. Salis,et al.  Efficient search, mapping, and optimization of multi‐protein genetic systems in diverse bacteria , 2014 .

[36]  Drew Endy,et al.  Precise and reliable gene expression via standard transcription and translation initiation elements , 2013, Nature Methods.

[37]  Oscar P Kuipers,et al.  Microbial bet-hedging: the power of being different. , 2015, Current opinion in microbiology.

[38]  Sarah Guiziou,et al.  A part toolbox to tune genetic expression in Bacillus subtilis , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  J C Rabinowitz,et al.  The influence of ribosome‐binding‐site elements on translational efficiency in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli in vivo , 1992, Molecular microbiology.

[40]  Vivek K. Mutalik,et al.  Composability of regulatory sequences controlling transcription and translation in Escherichia coli , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Doheon Lee,et al.  Mathematical modeling of translation initiation for the estimation of its efficiency to computationally design mRNA sequences with desired expression levels in prokaryotes , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[42]  S Brunak,et al.  Sigma A recognition sites in the Bacillus subtilis genome. , 2001, Microbiology.

[43]  L. Christiansen,et al.  Cloning of a maltogenic alpha-amylase from Bacillus stearothermophilus , 1988 .