Prospects and Pitfalls for Spectroscopic Remote Sensing of Biodiversity at the Global Scale

Imaging spectroscopy is a powerful new approach for observing aspects of the biological diversity of the Earth, conveying information about plant functional traits, habitat, and plant diversity itself. For decades, spectroscopic data suitable for this application have mainly been collected by aircraft. But in the next decade, global coverage from space by high-quality spectroscopic data will become available, preceded by instruments providing “global access”—not wall-to-wall coverage but data from almost anywhere in the world. For decades, scientists have experimented with and discussed optimal strategies for collecting spectroscopic data, but the next set of missions is now sufficiently well-defined that ecologists should consider how best to use the data that can now be expected. The anticipated flood of data will provide a new window on diversity, characterizing it in new ways that comprehensively sample space and change over time. Spectroscopic data will be peta-scale or larger, perhaps as much as 10 TB per day, and the data themselves will be high dimensional, requiring and allowing advanced big data techniques to be fully exploited. These data raise specific challenges such as how to characterize aggregate ecosystem characteristics, since the traits observed will change with phenology. Pixels will be fixed at ~30 m, 10–106 times larger than the plants they sample; other instrument objectives are likely in the range of 10 nm spectral sampling, coverage from 400 to 2500 nm with signal to noise in the range of 250–400. Imaging spectroscopy from space represents a huge opportunity for global ecology, but many conceptual, algorithmic, and theoretical issues will challenge the users.

[1]  W. Verhoef,et al.  PROSPECT+SAIL models: A review of use for vegetation characterization , 2009 .

[2]  M. Keller,et al.  Seeing the forest beyond the trees , 2015 .

[3]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Sources of Canopy Chemical and Spectral Diversity in Lowland Bornean Forest , 2012, Ecosystems.

[4]  F Stuart Chapin,et al.  Effects of plant traits on ecosystem and regional processes: a conceptual framework for predicting the consequences of global change. , 2003, Annals of botany.

[5]  Alan K. Knapp,et al.  Physiological Interactions Along Resource Gradients in a Tallgrass Prairie , 1991 .

[6]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[7]  P. Reich,et al.  Fundamental trade-offs generating the worldwide leaf economics spectrum. , 2006, Ecology.

[8]  D. Schimel,et al.  Flux towers in the sky: global ecology from space. , 2019, The New phytologist.

[9]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Hyperspectral remote sensing of foliar nitrogen content , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Detecting prairie biodiversity with airborne remote sensing , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[11]  Brian R. Johnson,et al.  NEON: the first continental-scale ecological observatory with airborne remote sensing of vegetation canopy biochemistry and structure , 2010 .

[12]  Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia,et al.  Mapping local and global variability in plant trait distributions , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  L. Poorter,et al.  Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[14]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Observing Changing Ecological Diversity in the Anthropocene , 2013 .

[15]  C. Wessman,et al.  Remote sensing of canopy chemistry and nitrogen cycling in temperate forest ecosystems , 1988, Nature.

[16]  John F. Muratore,et al.  Nitrogen and Lignin Control of Hardwood Leaf Litter Decomposition Dynamics , 1982 .

[17]  David R Thompson,et al.  A large airborne survey of Earth's visible-infrared spectral dimensionality. , 2017, Optics express.

[18]  S. Wright,et al.  The global spectrum of plant form and function , 2015, Nature.

[19]  J. Féret,et al.  Mapping tropical forest canopy diversity using high‐fidelity imaging spectroscopy. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[20]  N. T. Hobbs,et al.  Fire and Grazing in the Tallgrass Prairie: Contingent Effects on Nitrogen Budgets , 1991 .

[21]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Carnegie Airborne Observatory-2: Increasing science data dimensionality via high-fidelity multi-sensor fusion , 2012 .

[22]  M. Schaepman,et al.  Mapping functional diversity from remotely sensed morphological and physiological forest traits , 2017, Nature Communications.

[23]  Jens Kattge,et al.  Inclusion of ecologically based trait variation in plant functional types reduces the projected land carbon sink in an earth system model , 2015, Global change biology.

[24]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems , 1992 .

[25]  Clayton C. Kingdon,et al.  Spectroscopic determination of leaf morphological and biochemical traits for northern temperate and boreal tree species. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  G. Asner,et al.  Airborne laser-guided imaging spectroscopy to map forest trait diversity and guide conservation , 2017, Science.

[27]  M. Schildhauer,et al.  Monitoring plant functional diversity from space , 2016, Nature Plants.

[28]  Peter B. Adler,et al.  The plant diversity sampling design for The National Ecological Observatory Network , 2019, Ecosphere.

[29]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Mapping foliar functional traits and their uncertainties across three years in a grassland experiment , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[30]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Changes in duration of reproductive phases and lagged phenological response to experimental climate warming , 2011 .

[31]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  A methodology to derive global maps of leaf traits using remote sensing and climate data , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[32]  Aditya Singh,et al.  Associations of Leaf Spectra with Genetic and Phylogenetic Variation in Oaks: Prospects for Remote Detection of Biodiversity , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[33]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Disentangling the contribution of biological and physical properties of leaves and canopies in imaging spectroscopy data , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Susan L. Ustin,et al.  Opportunities for Using the EOS Imaging Spectrometers and Synthetic Aperture Radar in Ecological Models , 1991, Ecology.

[35]  Timothy G. F. Kittel,et al.  Terrestrial biogeochemical cycles: global interactions with the atmosphere and hydrology , 1991 .

[36]  John Shepanski,et al.  Hyperion, a space-based imaging spectrometer , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[37]  Clayton C. Kingdon,et al.  Imaging spectroscopy algorithms for mapping canopy foliar chemical and morphological traits and their uncertainties. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[38]  Kenta Ogawa,et al.  Observation planning algorithm of a Japanese space-borne sensor: Hyperspectral Imager SUIte (HISUI) onboard International Space Station (ISS) as platform , 2017, Remote Sensing.