Survey of quality models of e-learning systems

Abstract The main aim of the survey was to present current state of quality models of e-learning systems. Development of the quality models of e-learning systems was explored where some future directions were suggested. The quality models of e-learning systems were analyzed based on their different perspectives and dimensions according to the survey. Based on the survey the quality models applications were proposed according the context of the e-learning systems. Based on the investigated studies the quality characteristics of the e-learning systems were extracted. Different pedagogical characteristic were addressed for some studies. Learner satisfaction was addressed only in several studies. Only one study addresses software usability. As the main results of the survey one can conclude that there is large numbers of quality models of the e-learning systems. Finally, future research direction was suggested based on the results. In the future research the quality models should address different technical aspect of the e-learning systems which could assure sustain development of the systems due to rapid changing in information and communication technologies.

[1]  H. Nezamabadi-pour,et al.  Identification of a suitable ANN architecture in predicting strain in tie section of concrete deep beams , 2013 .

[2]  Stefan Hörmann,et al.  How to successfully implement E-learning for both students and teachers. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[3]  Sevgi Özkan,et al.  Multi-dimensional students' evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Azizah Jaafar,et al.  Instructors’ View about Implementation of E-learning System: An Analysis based on Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions☆ , 2012 .

[5]  Jongsu Lee,et al.  Users' perspective on the adoption of e-learning in developing countries: The case of Nepal with a conjoint-based discrete choice approach , 2018, Telematics Informatics.

[6]  Abbas Heydari,et al.  Evaluation of the parameters affecting the Schmidt rebound hammer reading using ANFIS method , 2018 .

[7]  P. Nicholson.  A History of E-Learning , 2007 .

[8]  Mehrbakhsh Nilashi,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making approach in E-learning: A systematic review and classification , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  Ron Oliver,et al.  Quality assurance and e-learning: blue skies and pragmatism , 2005 .

[10]  Hassan M. Selim,et al.  Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Sandra Meredith,et al.  Models of eLearning: Technology promise vs learner needs - case studies , 2004 .

[12]  Y. Yunus,et al.  Framework for the evaluation of e-learning in Malaysian Public Sector from the pedagogical perspective , 2008, 2008 International Symposium on Information Technology.

[13]  Juan Manuel Cueva Lovelle,et al.  WESONet: Applying semantic web technologies and collaborative tagging to multimedia web information systems , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Rusli Abdullah,et al.  A Technique for Quality Evaluation of E-Learning from Developers Perspective , 2011 .

[15]  Berner Lindström,et al.  Quality in e-learning: a framework for promoting and assuring quality in virtual institutions , 2012, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[16]  M'hammed Abdous,et al.  E-Learning Quality Assurance: A Process-Oriented Lifecycle Model. , 2009 .

[17]  Martin Cooper,et al.  Using management procedure gaps to enhance e-learning implementation in Africa , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Simon Lygo-Baker,et al.  Measuring the quality of e-learning , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  Connections between e-learning, web science, cognitive computation and social sensing, and their relevance to learning analytics: A preliminary study , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Martin Misut,et al.  Measuring of Quality in the Context of e-Learning , 2015 .

[21]  D. Weaver,et al.  Academic and student use of a learning management system: Implications for quality , 2008 .

[22]  A. Alzahrani,et al.  E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unified perspective from instructors and students , 2018 .

[23]  Gustavo Rossi,et al.  Specifying Quality Characteristics and Attributes for Websites , 2001, Web Engineering.

[24]  Meldi Suhatril,et al.  Fuzzy modelling approach for shear strength prediction of RC deep beams , 2015 .

[25]  Lúcia Blondet Baruque,et al.  Towards a framework for corporate e-learning evaluation , 2007, EATIS '07.

[26]  Melánia Feszterová.  Implementation of E-Learning in to OHS Education , 2015 .

[27]  Maryam Asoodar,et al.  Framework to improve e-learner satisfaction and further strengthen e-learning implementation , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Alistair Inglis,et al.  Approaches to the validation of quality frameworks for e‐learning , 2008 .

[29]  Daniel Neagu,et al.  Assessing information quality of e-learning systems: a web mining approach , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  F. Scheele,et al.  Quality specifications in postgraduate medical e-learning: an integrative literature review leading to a postgraduate medical e-learning model , 2016, BMC Medical Education.

[31]  Fahrul Agus,et al.  User Satisfaction Model for e-Learning Using Smartphone , 2017, ICCSCI.

[32]  Hossein Nezamabadi-pour,et al.  An evolutionary fuzzy modelling approach and comparison of different methods for shear strength prediction of high-strength concrete beams without stirrups , 2014 .

[33]  Monica Stănescu,et al.  Quality Analysis Model of the E-learning Training System for Sports Occupations , 2015 .

[34]  Marjan Hericko,et al.  A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Sanjay Kumar Dubey,et al.  Comparison of Software Quality Models: An Analytical Approach , 2012 .

[36]  Xi Zhang,et al.  The impact of second life on team learning outcomes from the perspective of it capabilities , 2012 .

[37]  Dowming Yeh,et al.  What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[38]  N. Sulong,et al.  Prediction of shear capacity of channel shear connectors using the ANFIS model , 2014 .