Differences in human evoked potentials related to olfactory or trigeminal chemosensory activation.

The aim of the present study was to determine, whether there are differences in the topographical distribution of chemosensory evoked potentials (CSEPs) due to stimulation with different odorous substances. The odorants used in the study which mainly excited the olfactory nerve were vanillin and acetaldehyde; those which additionally excited the trigeminal nerve were sulphur dioxide and ammonia. Twelve subjects participated in the study. The subjects separately estimated the intensity of the odorous and of the painful/pricking sensation caused by the stimuli, and described the odorous qualities in their own words. CSEPs were recorded from 7 positions. After stimulation with "olfactory" substances maximum CSEP amplitudes were recorded at parieto-central sites, and after stimulation with "trigeminal" substances maximum amplitudes were obtained at the vertex. Following stimulation with ammonia and sulphur dioxide amplitudes were largest contralateral to the stimulated nostril. In contrast, little difference in CSEP amplitudes was observed between hemispheres after stimulation with vanillin or acetaldehyde. Thus, the topographical distribution of CSEP amplitudes may provide information with regard to the sensory system (olfactory or trigeminal) activated by the presentation of an odorous stimulus.

[1]  W. Cain,et al.  Comparability of two tests of olfactory functioning , 1989 .

[2]  William S. Cain,et al.  Interaction between chemoreceptive modalities of odour and irritation , 1980, Nature.

[3]  E. Chudler,et al.  Tooth pulp-evoked potentials in the monkey: Cortical surface and intracortical distribution , 1985, Pain.

[4]  D. Hornung,et al.  Olfactory sensitivity: Is there laterality? , 1982 .

[5]  T. Tanabe,et al.  A transthalamic olfactory pathway to orbitofrontal cortex in the monkey. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  M. Furukawa,et al.  Importance of unilateral examination in olfactometry. , 1988, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[7]  G Kobal,et al.  Cerebral chemosensory evoked potentials elicited by chemical stimulation of the human olfactory and respiratory nasal mucosa. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Gerd Kobal,et al.  Pain-related electrical potentials of the human nasal mucosa elicited by chemical stimulation , 1985, Pain.

[9]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  G. Kobal,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Olfactory Evoked Potentials and Techniques Involved in Their Measurement , 1979 .

[11]  P. Jurs,et al.  Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: Psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans , 1978, Physiology & Behavior.

[12]  R. Doty,et al.  Development of the university of pennsylvania smell identification test: A standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function , 1984, Physiology & Behavior.

[13]  T. Tanabe,et al.  An olfactory projection area in orbitofrontal cortex of the monkey. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  G Kobal,et al.  Cortical responses to painful CO2 stimulation of nasal mucosa; a magnetoencephalographic study in man. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.