Cirrus cloud seeding: a climate engineering mechanism with reduced side effects?

Climate engineering, the intentional alteration of Earth's climate, is a multifaceted and controversial topic. Numerous climate engineering mechanisms (CEMs) have been proposed, and the efficacies and potential undesired consequences of some of them have been studied in the safe environments of numerical models. Here, we present a global modelling study of a so far understudied CEM, namely the seeding of cirrus clouds to reduce their lifetimes in the upper troposphere, and hence their greenhouse effect. Different from most CEMs, the intention of cirrus seeding is not to reduce the amount of solar radiation reaching Earth's surface. This particular CEM rather targets the greenhouse effect, by reducing the trapping of infrared radiation by high clouds. This avoids some of the caveats that have been identified for solar radiation management, for example, the delayed recovery of stratospheric ozone or drastic changes to Earth's hydrological cycle. We find that seeding of mid- and high-latitude cirrus clouds has the potential to cool the planet by about 1.4 K, and that this cooling is accompanied by only a modest reduction in rainfall. Intriguingly, seeding of the 15% of the globe with the highest solar noon zenith angles at any given time yields the same global mean cooling as a seeding strategy that involves 45% of the globe. In either case, the cooling is strongest at high latitudes, and could therefore serve to prevent Arctic sea ice loss. With the caveat that there are still significant uncertainties associated with ice nucleation in cirrus clouds and its representation in climate models, cirrus seeding appears to represent a powerful CEM with reduced side effects.

[1]  Roelof T. Bruintjes,et al.  A Review of Cloud Seeding Experiments to Enhance Precipitation and Some New Prospects , 1999 .

[2]  J. D. Gunton,et al.  Homogeneous Nucleation , 1999 .

[3]  B. Luo,et al.  Water activity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions , 2000, Nature.

[4]  Q. Fu,et al.  Tropical cirrus and water vapor: an effective Earth infrared iris feedback? , 2001 .

[5]  M. Holland,et al.  Polar amplification of climate change in coupled models , 2003 .

[6]  Jeffrey H. Yin,et al.  A consistent poleward shift of the storm tracks in simulations of 21st century climate , 2005 .

[7]  Marika M. Holland,et al.  Future abrupt reductions in the summer Arctic sea ice , 2006 .

[8]  B. Soden,et al.  Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global Warming , 2006 .

[9]  G. Meehl,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis for Policymakers , 2007 .

[10]  Georgiy L. Stenchikov,et al.  Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections , 2008 .

[11]  Sarah M. Kang,et al.  The Response of the ITCZ to Extratropical Thermal Forcing: Idealized Slab-Ocean Experiments with a GCM , 2008 .

[12]  A. Nenes,et al.  Parameterization of cirrus cloud formation in large‐scale models: Homogeneous nucleation , 2008 .

[13]  Paul J. Valdes,et al.  “Sunshade World”: A fully coupled GCM evaluation of the climatic impacts of geoengineering , 2008 .

[14]  K. Taylor,et al.  Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Improvements to NOAA’s Historical Merged Land–Ocean Surface Temperature Analysis (1880–2006) , 2008 .

[16]  William Finnegan,et al.  Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming , 2009 .

[17]  A. Nenes,et al.  Parameterizing the competition between homogeneous and heterogeneous freezing in cirrus cloud formation – monodisperse ice nuclei , 2009 .

[18]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Influence of particle size on the ice nucleating ability of mineral dusts , 2009 .

[19]  Dirk Notz,et al.  The future of ice sheets and sea ice: Between reversible retreat and unstoppable loss , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Sarah M. Kang,et al.  The Tropical Response to Extratropical Thermal Forcing in an Idealized GCM: The Importance of Radiative Feedbacks and Convective Parameterization , 2009 .

[21]  David T. Bolvin,et al.  Improving the global precipitation record: GPCP Version 2.1 , 2009 .

[22]  S. Klein,et al.  Global simulations of ice nucleation and ice supersaturation with an improved cloud scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2010 .

[23]  C. Brühl,et al.  Multimodel assessment of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: Extratropics , 2010 .

[24]  Nicolas Bellouin,et al.  Precipitation, radiative forcing and global temperature change , 2010 .

[25]  I. Eisenman Geographic muting of changes in the Arctic sea ice cover , 2010 .

[26]  K. Taylor,et al.  The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2011 .

[27]  R. Lawson,et al.  Cirrus Clouds and Climate Engineering: New Findings on Ice Nucleation and Theoretical Basis , 2011 .

[28]  Richard Neale,et al.  Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate Models: Description and Evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 , 2012 .

[29]  D. Frierson,et al.  Extratropical Influence on ITCZ Shifts in Slab Ocean Simulations of Global Warming , 2012 .

[30]  J. Chiang,et al.  Extratropical Cooling, Interhemispheric Thermal Gradients, and Tropical Climate Change , 2012 .

[32]  S. Wijffels,et al.  Ocean Salinities Reveal Strong Global Water Cycle Intensification During 1950 to 2000 , 2012, Science.

[33]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Sensitivity studies of dust ice nuclei effect on cirrus clouds with the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 , 2012 .

[34]  S. Wijffels,et al.  Durack During 1950 to 2000 Ocean Salinities Reveal Strong Global Water Cycle Intensification , 2012 .

[35]  P. Wadhams,et al.  Abrupt climate change in the Arctic , 2012 .

[36]  P. Rasch,et al.  Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2013 .

[37]  W. G. Strand,et al.  Climate Change Projections in CESM1(CAM5) Compared to CCSM4 , 2013 .

[38]  Muyin Wang,et al.  When will the summer Arctic be nearly sea ice free? , 2013 .

[39]  K. Caldeira,et al.  The Science of Geoengineering , 2013 .

[40]  Andrew S. Jones,et al.  Asymmetric forcing from stratospheric aerosols impacts Sahelian rainfall , 2013 .

[41]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Management of trade-offs in geoengineering through optimal choice of non-uniform radiative forcing , 2013 .

[42]  R. Horton,et al.  Reducing spread in climate model projections of a September ice-free Arctic , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Shingo Watanabe,et al.  The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2013 .

[44]  C. Twohy,et al.  Clarifying the Dominant Sources and Mechanisms of Cirrus Cloud Formation , 2013, Science.

[45]  J. Comstock,et al.  Aerosol effects on cirrus through ice nucleation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 with a statistical cirrus scheme , 2014 .

[46]  T. Storelvmo,et al.  The climatic effects of modifying cirrus clouds in a climate engineering framework , 2014 .

[47]  T. Storelvmo,et al.  Cirrus cloud susceptibility to the injection of ice nuclei in the upper troposphere , 2014 .