A Bayesian view of the current status of dark matter direct searches

Bayesian statistical methods offer a simple and consistent framework for incorporating uncertainties into a multi-parameter inference problem. In this work we apply these methods to a selection of current direct dark matter searches. We consider the simplest scenario of spin-independent elastic WIMP scattering, and infer the WIMP mass and cross-section from the experimental data with the essential systematic uncertainties folded into the analysis. We find that when uncertainties in the scintillation efficiency of XENON100 have been accounted for, the resulting exclusion limit is not sufficiently constraining to rule out the CoGeNT preferred parameter region, contrary to previous claims. In the same vein, we also investigate the impact of astrophysical uncertainties on the preferred WIMP parameters. We find that within the class of smooth and isotropic WIMP velocity distributions, it is difficult to reconcile the DAMA and the CoGeNT preferred regions by tweaking the astrophysics parameters alone. If we demand compatibility between these experiments, then the inference process naturally concludes that a high value for the sodium quenching factor for DAMA is preferred.

[1]  F. Kahlhoefer,et al.  On the DAMA and CoGeNT Modulations , 2011, 1105.3734.

[2]  S. R. Golwala,et al.  Combined limits on WIMPs from the CDMS and EDELWEISS experiments , 2011, 1105.3377.

[3]  M. Kadastik,et al.  Implications of Xenon100 and LHC results for Dark Matter models , 2011, 1104.3572.

[4]  C. Winant,et al.  Search for light dark matter in XENON10 data. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[5]  E Aprile,et al.  Dark matter results from 100 live days of XENON100 data. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[6]  B. Paul,et al.  Final results of the EDELWEISS-II WIMP search using a 4-kg array of cryogenic germanium detectors with interleaved electrodes , 2011, 1103.4070.

[7]  K. Arisaka,et al.  Likelihood approach to the first dark matter results from XENON100 , 2011, 1103.0303.

[8]  N. Fornengo,et al.  Discussing direct search of dark matter particles in the Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model with light neutralinos , 2010, 1011.4743.

[9]  P. Scott,et al.  How well will ton-scale dark matter direct detection experiments constrain minimal supersymmetry? , 2010, 1011.4318.

[10]  D O Caldwell,et al.  Results from a low-energy analysis of the CDMS II germanium data. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[11]  R. Wechsler,et al.  Dark matter at the end of the Galaxy , 2010, 1010.4300.

[12]  M. Winkler,et al.  Light dark matter in the singlet-extended MSSM , 2010, 1010.0553.

[13]  Tao Liu,et al.  Dark light-Higgs bosons. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[14]  D. Hooper,et al.  CoGeNT, DAMA, and Light Neutralino Dark Matter , 2010, 1009.0549.

[15]  Jin Min Yang,et al.  Light dark matter from the U(1)X sector in the NMSSM with gauge mediation , 2010, 1008.5243.

[16]  K. Freese,et al.  XENON10/100 dark matter constraints in comparison with CoGeNT and DAMA: Examining the L eff dependence , 2010, 1006.0972.

[17]  G. Drake,et al.  Results from a search for light-mass dark matter with a p-type point contact germanium detector. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[18]  T. Schwetz Direct detection data and possible hints for low-mass WIMPs , 2010, 1011.5432.

[19]  R. W. Ogburn,et al.  Low-threshold analysis of CDMS shallow-site data , 2010, 1010.4290.

[20]  A. Green Dependence of direct detection signals on the WIMP velocity distribution , 2010, 1009.0916.

[21]  A. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Dark Moments and the DAMA-CoGeNT Puzzle , 2010, 1007.5325.

[22]  D. Das,et al.  Light dark matter in the NMSSM: upper bounds on direct detection cross sections , 2010, 1007.1151.

[23]  D. Hooper,et al.  Consistent dark matter interpretation for CoGeNT and DAMA/LIBRA , 2010, 1007.1005.

[24]  I. Dur'an,et al.  Observational constraints on a holographic, interacting dark energy model , 2010, 1007.0390.

[25]  Y. Mambrini The kinetic dark-mixing in the light of CoGENT and XENON100 , 2010, 1006.3318.

[26]  P. Gondolo,et al.  Channeling in direct dark matter detection I: channeling fraction in NaI (Tl) crystals , 2010, 1006.3110.

[27]  R. Trotta,et al.  Identification of dark matter particles with LHC and direct detection data , 2010, 1005.4280.

[28]  V. Barger,et al.  Complex Scalar Dark Matter vis-`a-vis CoGeNT, DAMA/LIBRA and XENON100 , 2010, 1005.3328.

[29]  Arizona State University,et al.  Impact of dark matter microhalos on signatures for direct and indirect detection , 2010, 1004.5432.

[30]  R. Harnik,et al.  Exothermic dark matter , 2010, 1004.0937.

[31]  A. Pierce,et al.  CoGeNT Interpretations , 2010, 1004.0697.

[32]  P. Salucci,et al.  The dark matter density at the Sun’s location , 2010, 1003.3101.

[33]  F. Ling,et al.  Light scalar WIMP through the Higgs portal and CoGeNT , 2010, 1003.2595.

[34]  D. Hooper,et al.  Implications of CoGeNT and DAMA for Light WIMP Dark Matter , 2010, 1003.0014.

[35]  K. Gorski,et al.  Large scale directional anomalies in the WMAP 5yr ILC map , 2010, 1002.3928.

[36]  P. Belli,et al.  New results from DAMA/LIBRA , 2010, 1002.1028.

[37]  J. Zupan,et al.  Global interpretation of direct Dark Matter searches after CDMS-II results , 2009, 0912.4264.

[38]  D O Caldwell,et al.  Dark Matter Search Results from the CDMS II Experiment , 2009, Science.

[39]  R. Teyssier,et al.  Dark matter direct detection signals inferred from a cosmological N-body simulation with baryons , 2009, 0909.2028.

[40]  J. Stadel,et al.  Dark matter direct detection with non-Maxwellian velocity structure , 2009, 0912.2358.

[41]  Markus Weber,et al.  Determination of the Local Dark Matter Density in our Galaxy , 2009, 0910.4272.

[42]  C. Winant,et al.  Constraints on inelastic dark matter from XENON10 , 2009, 0910.3698.

[43]  Reconstructing WIMP properties in direct detection experiments including galactic dark matter distribution uncertainties , 2009, 0906.5361.

[44]  G. A. Moellenbrock,et al.  TRIGONOMETRIC PARALLAXES OF MASSIVE STAR-FORMING REGIONS. VI. GALACTIC STRUCTURE, FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETERS, AND NONCIRCULAR MOTIONS , 2009, 0902.3913.

[45]  A. Peter Dark matter in the Solar System. I. The distribution function of WIMPs at the Earth from solar capture , 2009, 0902.1344.

[46]  R. W. Ogburn,et al.  Search for weakly interacting massive particles with the first five-tower data from the cryogenic dark matter search at the soudan underground laboratory. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[47]  M. McCullough,et al.  Inelastic dark matter, non-standard halos and the DAMA/LIBRA results , 2008, 0812.1931.

[48]  A. J. Hughes,et al.  Results from the first science run of the ZEPLIN-III dark matter search experiment , 2008, 0812.1150.

[49]  R. Genzel,et al.  MONITORING STELLAR ORBITS AROUND THE MASSIVE BLACK HOLE IN THE GALACTIC CENTER , 2008, 0810.4674.

[50]  L. Stodolsky,et al.  Commissioning run of the CRESST-II dark matter search , 2008, 0809.1829.

[51]  K. Freese,et al.  Compatibility of DAMA/LIBRA dark matter detection with other searches , 2008, 0808.3607.

[52]  M. Fairbairn,et al.  Spin-independent elastic WIMP scattering and the DAMA annual modulation signal , 2008, 0808.0704.

[53]  P. Barbeau Neutrino and astroparticle physics with P-type point contact high purity germanium detectors , 2009 .

[54]  Durham,et al.  Phase-space structure in the local dark matter distribution and its signature in direct detection experiments , 2008, 0812.0362.

[55]  Carlos S. Frenk,et al.  The diversity and similarity of simulated cold dark matter haloes , 2008, 0810.1522.

[56]  F. Feroz,et al.  The impact of priors and observables on parameter inferences in the constrained MSSM , 2008, 0809.3792.

[57]  E. Daw,et al.  Measurement of the quenching factor of Na recoils in NaI(Tl) , 2008, 0806.1916.

[58]  Univ. Jing Gangshan,et al.  First results from DAMA/LIBRA and the combined results with DAMA/NaI , 2008, 0804.2741.

[59]  R. Trotta Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology , 2008, 0803.4089.

[60]  O. Høst,et al.  Impact of going beyond the Maxwell distribution in direct dark matter detection rates , 2007, 0711.4895.

[61]  C. Winant,et al.  First results from the XENON10 dark matter experiment at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[62]  A. Green Determining the weakly interacting massive particles mass using direct detection experiments , 2007, hep-ph/0703217.

[63]  J. Hamann,et al.  Observational bounds on the cosmic radiation density , 2007, 0705.0440.

[64]  A. Green Determining the weakly interacting massive particles mass using direct detection experiments , 2007, hep-ph/0703217.

[65]  B. Gibson,et al.  The RAVE Survey: Constraining the Local Galactic Escape Speed , 2006, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.

[66]  K. Freese,et al.  Annual modulation of dark matter in the presence of streams , 2006, astro-ph/0607121.

[67]  W. Dehnen,et al.  The velocity dispersion and mass profile of the Milky Way , 2006, astro-ph/0603825.

[68]  R. W. Ogburn,et al.  Limits on spin-independent interactions of weakly interacting massive particles with nucleons from the two-tower run of the cryogenic dark matter search. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[69]  B. Moore,et al.  Empirical Models for Dark Matter Halos. I. Nonparametric Construction of Density Profiles and Comparison with Parametric Models , 2005, astro-ph/0509417.

[70]  C. Lester,et al.  Multidimensional mSUGRA likelihood maps , 2005, hep-ph/0507283.

[71]  P. Gondolo,et al.  Compatibility of DAMA dark matter detection with other searches , 2005, hep-ph/0504010.

[72]  J. P. Castle,et al.  First results from the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search in the Soudan Underground Laboratory. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[73]  E. Baltz,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo Exploration of Minimal Supergravity with Implications for Dark Matter , 2004, hep-ph/0407039.

[74]  H. Newberg,et al.  Effects of the Sagittarius dwarf tidal stream on dark matter detectors. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[75]  A. Green Effect of realistic astrophysical inputs on the phase and shape of the weakly interacting massive particles annual modulation signal , 2003 .

[76]  A. Green Effect of realistic astrophysical inputs on the phase and shape of the WIMP annual modulation signal , 2003, astro-ph/0304446.

[77]  L. Verde,et al.  Dark halo properties from rotation curves , 2002, astro-ph/0201352.

[78]  T. Beers,et al.  The Mass of the Milky Way: Limits from a newly assembled set of halo objects , 2002, astro-ph/0210508.

[79]  A. Lewis,et al.  Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach , 2002, astro-ph/0205436.

[80]  R. Cerulli,et al.  Effect of the galactic halo modeling on the DAMA/NaI annual modulation result: an extended analysis of the data for WIMPs with a purely spin-independent coupling , 2002, hep-ph/0203242.

[81]  Canada.,et al.  Signatures of hierarchical clustering in dark matter detection experiments , 2001, astro-ph/0106048.

[82]  P. Ullio,et al.  Velocity distributions and annual-modulation signatures of weakly-interacting massive particles , 2000, hep-ph/0006183.

[83]  G. Lake,et al.  Density Profiles and Substructure of Dark Matter Halos: Converging Results at Ultra-High Numerical Resolution , 1999, astro-ph/9910166.

[84]  J. Binney,et al.  Local stellar kinematics from Hipparcos data , 1997, astro-ph/9710077.

[85]  S. White,et al.  A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering , 1996, astro-ph/9611107.

[86]  Mario Pillon,et al.  New limits on WIMP search with large-mass low-radioactivity NaI(Tl) set-up at Gran Sasso , 1996 .

[87]  Diana N. Shaul,et al.  Improved dark matter limits from pulse shape discrimination in a low background sodium iodide detector at the Boulby mine , 1996 .

[88]  J. D. Lewin,et al.  Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil , 1996 .

[89]  A. Burkert The Structure of Dark Matter Halos in Dwarf Galaxies , 1995, astro-ph/9504041.

[90]  Kinoshita,et al.  Application of a large-volume NaI scintillator to search for dark matter. , 1993, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[91]  Robert Cousins,et al.  Incorporating systematic uncertainties into an upper limit , 1992 .

[92]  T. Loredo From Laplace to Supernova SN 1987A: Bayesian Inference in Astrophysics , 1990 .

[93]  J. Einasto,et al.  Galactic models with massive corona. I - Method. II - Galaxy , 1989 .

[94]  Gunter Zech,et al.  Upper limits in experiments with background or measurement errors , 1989 .

[95]  J. Einasto,et al.  Galactic models with massive corona. I: Method , 1989 .

[96]  Otaviano Helene,et al.  Upper limit of peak area , 1983 .

[97]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[98]  Richard H. Helm,et al.  Inelastic and Elastic Scattering of 187-Mev Electrons from Selected Even-Even Nuclei , 1956 .

[99]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.