Direct and indirect effects of climate and habitat factors on butterfly diversity.

Many factors, including climate, resource availability, and habitat diversity, have been proposed as determinants of global diversity, but the links among them have rarely been studied. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), we investigated direct and indirect effects of climate variables, host-plant richness, and habitat diversity on butterfly species richness across Britain, at 20-km grid resolution. These factors were all important determinants of butterfly diversity, but their relative contributions differed between habitat generalists and specialists, and whether the effects were direct or indirect. Climate variables had strong effects on habitat generalists, whereas host-plant richness and habitat diversity contributed relatively more for habitat specialists. Considering total effects (direct and indirect together), climate variables had the strongest link to butterfly species richness for all groups of species. The results suggest that different mechanistic hypotheses to explain species richness may be more appropriate for habitat generalists and specialists, with generalists hypothesized to show direct physiological limitations and specialists additionally being constrained by trophic interactions (climate affecting host-plant richness).

[1]  Alexander von Eye,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling: Theory , 2009 .

[2]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Water links the historical and contemporary components of the Australian bird diversity gradient , 2005 .

[3]  David M. Stoms,et al.  Anthropogenic impacts upon plant species richness and net primary productivity in California , 2004 .

[4]  J. Turner.  Explaining the global biodiversity gradient: energy, area, history and natural selection , 2004 .

[5]  W. Cramer,et al.  The performance of models relating species geographical distributions to climate is independent of trophic level , 2004 .

[6]  Jerald B. Johnson,et al.  Model selection in ecology and evolution. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  B. A. Hawkins,et al.  Water–energy balance and the geographic pattern of species richness of western Palearctic butterflies , 2003 .

[8]  Richard Field,et al.  ENERGY, WATER, AND BROAD‐SCALE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS , 2003 .

[9]  B. Meatyard.  New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora: By C.D. Preston, D.A. Pearman and T.D. Dines. Published by Oxford University Press, 2002. ISBN 0 19 851067 5 (Hardback with CD). 912 pages. Price £99.95 , 2003 .

[10]  Robert Haining,et al.  Spatial Data Analysis: Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[11]  Robert Haining,et al.  Spatial data analysis , 2003 .

[12]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology , 2003 .

[13]  Eric E. Porter,et al.  Does Herbivore Diversity Depend on Plant Diversity? The Case of California Butterflies , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[14]  J. K. Hill,et al.  Responses of butterflies to twentieth century climate warming: implications for future ranges , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  C. Thomas,et al.  The influence of thermal ecology on the distribution of three nymphalid butterflies , 2002 .

[16]  J. K. Hill,et al.  Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change , 2001, Nature.

[17]  T. Boulinier,et al.  Ecological Biogeography of Southern Ocean Islands: The Importance of Considering Spatial Issues , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[18]  J. Kerr,et al.  Remotely sensed habitat diversity predicts butterfly species richness and community similarity in Canada , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2001 .

[20]  Jeremy T. Kerr,et al.  Butterfly Species Richness Patterns in Canada: Energy, Heterogeneity, and the Potential Consequences of Climate Change , 2001 .

[21]  J. Asher.  The millennium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland , 2001 .

[22]  Jeremy J. D. Greenwood,et al.  Bird diversity and environmental gradients in Britain: a test of the species–energy hypothesis , 2000 .

[23]  D. Tilman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Dependence of Arthropod Diversity on Plant Diversity , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[24]  D. Roy,et al.  Coincidence in the distributions of butterflies and their foodplants , 1998 .

[25]  J. Kerr,et al.  Lepidopteran richness patterns in North America , 1998 .

[26]  C. Thomas,et al.  Nettle‐feeding nymphalid butterflies: temperature, development and distribution , 1997 .

[27]  Michael L. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1997 .

[28]  Rick Durrett,et al.  Spatial Models for Species-Area Curves , 1996 .

[29]  D. Currie.  Energy and Large-Scale Patterns of Animal- and Plant-Species Richness , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[30]  R. Dennis,et al.  Climatic change and the British butterfly fauna: Opportunities and constraints , 1991 .

[31]  A. Pullin,et al.  Effects of low temperature on diapausing Aglais urticae and Inachis io (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): Cold hardiness and overwintering survival , 1989 .

[32]  M. Williamson,et al.  Relationship of species number to area, distance and other variables , 1988 .

[33]  J. Turner,et al.  Does Solar Energy Control Organic Diversity? Butterflies, Moths and the British Climate , 1987 .

[34]  David H. Wright,et al.  Species-energy theory: an extension of species-area theory , 1983 .