Nonlinear Backstepping Active Suspension Design Applied to a Half-Car Model

A fresh nonlinear backstepping design scheme, which is developed for the control of half-car active suspension systems to improve the inherent tradeoff between ride quality and suspension travel, is proposed in this paper. Since ride quality is dependent on a combination of vertical and angular displacements of a vehicle body, the design of active suspensions must have the potential to minimize heave and pitch movements in order to guarantee the ride comfort of passengers. The other important factor to be emphasized in the design of active suspensions is the suspension travel which means the space variation between the car body and the tires. In order to avoid damaging vehicle components and generating more passenger discomfort, the active suspension controllers must be capable of preventing the suspension from hitting its travel limits. Our design strategy, with two intentionally additional nonlinear filters, shows the potential to achieve these conflicting control objectives. The novelty of our active suspension design is in the use of two particular nonlinear filters at both the front and rear wheels. The effective bandwidths of these two nonlinear filters depend on the magnitudes of the front and rear suspension travels, individually. When suspension travel is small, the proposed controllers soften the suspension for enhancing passenger comfort. However, our control design shifts its attention to rattlespace utilization by stiffening the suspension when suspension travel approaches its limits. As a result, the improvement of tradeoff between ride quality and suspension travel can be guaranteed and is then demonstrated through comparative simulations.

[1]  Charles E. M. Pearce,et al.  Direct Computation of the Performance Index for an Optimally Controlled Active Suspension with Preview Applied to a Half-Car Model , 2001 .

[2]  D. Hrovat,et al.  Survey of Advanced Suspension Developments and Related Optimal Control Applications, , 1997, Autom..

[3]  Fu-Cheng Wang,et al.  Controller parameterization for disturbance response decoupling: application to vehicle active suspension control , 2002, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[4]  Chiou-Jye Huang,et al.  NONLINEAR BACKSTEPPING CONTROL DESIGN OF HALF-CAR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS. , 2003 .

[5]  Jung-Shan Lin,et al.  Nonlinear active'suspension design for half-car models , 2002 .

[6]  Jung-Shan Lin,et al.  Nonlinear design of active suspensions , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[7]  M G Pollard,et al.  Passenger Comfort—the Role of Active Suspensions , 1984 .

[8]  R. Krtolica,et al.  Optimal active suspension control based on a half-car model , 1990, 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[9]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Active Suspension Control of Ground Vehicle Heave and Pitch Motions , 1999 .

[10]  Jung-Shan Lin,et al.  Modular adaptive design for active suspensions , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[11]  Charles E. M. Pearce,et al.  PHYSICALLY REALISABLE FEEDBACK CONTROLS FOR A FULLY ACTIVE PREVIEW SUSPENSION APPLIED TO A HALF-CAR MODEL , 1998 .

[12]  Jung-Shan Lin,et al.  Road-adaptive nonlinear design of active suspensions , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[13]  Dean Karnopp,et al.  ACTIVE DAMPING IN ROAD VEHICLE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS , 1983 .

[14]  D. Hrovat,et al.  Optimal active suspension control based on a half-car model: an analytical solution , 1992 .