Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review

Mapping key areas for ecosystem service (ES) supply is essential for the development of strategies that will ensure their future supply. Given the rapid development in this area of research, we performed a review of different approaches used to map ES, with a special focus on those that use social–ecological data. We used an analytical framework based on five criteria for analyzing and comparing the methodological approaches: the types of ES, availability of data sources, types of data sources, spatial scale, and methods used to model ES. We found that regulating services were the most commonly mapped, followed by provisioning, cultural, and supporting services. Secondary (readily available) data were used more frequently than primary data to map ES. Biophysical data (land-cover variables) and mixed sources (databases like global statistics) were the most commonly employed ones. Most studies were performed at the regional or at the national scale. The most commonly used method to model services was the development of models based on the well-known causal relationships between environmental variables, followed by the extrapolation of ES values from primary data to the total analyzed area frequently using land-cover maps. Our synthesis reveals that the majority of studies are based on secondary data, applied at broad scales, without validation techniques. There is an urgent need to develop methods for deepening our understanding of the social–ecological processes behind the supply of ES in order to improve our ability to map ES for decision making.

[1]  P. Sutton,et al.  SPECIAL ISSUE: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation , 2002 .

[2]  P. Kareiva,et al.  An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services , 2011 .

[4]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[5]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[6]  M. Plummer,et al.  Assessing benefit transfer for the valuation of ecosystem services , 2009 .

[7]  M. Honzák,et al.  Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: Opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar , 2010 .

[8]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  John P. Wilson,et al.  Multi-scale linkages between topographic attributes and vegetation indices in a mountainous landscape , 2007 .

[10]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[11]  Gregory Brown Mapping Spatial Attributes in Survey Research for Natural Resource Management: Methods and Applications , 2004 .

[12]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  The way forward with ecosystem-based management in tropical contexts: Reconciling with existing management systems , 2012 .

[14]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Ronald E. Lacey,et al.  Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas , 2001 .

[16]  A. Troy,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer , 2006 .

[17]  C. Malmstrom,et al.  Using Remote Sensing to Evaluate the Influence of Grassland Restoration Activities on Ecosystem Forage Provisioning Services , 2009 .

[18]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[19]  Anne Larigauderie,et al.  The Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Science-Policy Interface , 2011, Science.

[20]  W. Ju,et al.  Combining remote sensing imagery and forest age inventory for biomass mapping. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  Patricia Balvanera,et al.  Plant diversity enhances provision of ecosystem services: A new synthesis , 2010 .

[22]  David S. Fox,et al.  New metrics for managing and sustaining the ocean's bounty , 2012 .

[23]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data , 2011 .

[24]  D. Richardson,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management , 2008 .

[25]  R. Moss,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment , 2003 .

[26]  B. Bryan,et al.  Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services , 2009 .

[27]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services of Tropical Dry Forests: Insights from Long-term Ecological and Social Research on the Pacific Coast of Mexico , 2005 .

[28]  J. Boyd,et al.  What are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units , 2006 .

[29]  M. Arriaza,et al.  Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes , 2004 .

[30]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[31]  K. Gaston,et al.  Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities , 2009 .

[32]  C. Dormann,et al.  A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead , 2011 .

[33]  Gregory Brown,et al.  A Method for assessing protected area allocations using a typology of landscape values , 2006 .

[34]  A. Marshall,et al.  Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[35]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global Conservation of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services , 2007 .

[36]  G. Daily,et al.  Conserving Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services , 2001, Science.

[37]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The impact of proxy‐based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services , 2010 .

[38]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Error propagation associated with benefits transfer-based mapping of ecosystem services , 2010 .

[39]  D. Semmens,et al.  A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services , 2011 .

[40]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[41]  Pamela A Matson,et al.  Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.