Abstract Two statistical techniques are developed to predict the statistical moments of the horizontal motion of a floating moored dock, known as catenary anchor leg mooring (CALM), loaded by hydrodynamic random forces. The dock is represented by a lumped mass, the mooring cables by equivalent nonlinear springs and the hydrodynamic forces are modelled by a modified Morison equation. The model of the floating dock leads to a nonlinear ordinary differential equation. Although the problem could be approached by a direct numerical integration, e.g. by Monte-Carlo simulations, because of the stochastic nature of the excitation, this would imply a large number of runs to produce results of some statistical significance. In the present paper an alternative solution is based on the development of two more efficient techniques to predict the relevant statistical moments of the dock response. The first method, called CPSP (conventional perturbation–statistical perturbation), is based on the application of two subsequent perturbation techniques, the first relying on a classical perturbation method, the second on a statistical perturbation approach. The second method, called SLSP (statistical linearization–statistical perturbation), combines indeed a statistical linearization approach together with a statistical perturbation approach. The procedures allow the linearization of the cables restoring forces as well as of the hydrodynamic load and they can be easily generalized to be applied to different dock configurations or to systems of different physical nature. The results, compared with those obtained by a Monte-Carlo simulations, show, in terms of statistical moments of the dock response, a satisfactory agreement.
[1]
D. Xiu,et al.
Stochastic Modeling of Flow-Structure Interactions Using Generalized Polynomial Chaos
,
2002
.
[2]
Stuart J. Price,et al.
Post-Instability Behavior of a Structurally Nonlinear Airfoil in Longitudinal Turbulence
,
1997
.
[3]
D. Dessì,et al.
Hydrofoil vibration induced by a random flow: a stochastic perturbation approach
,
2005
.
[4]
George E. Karniadakis,et al.
Spectral Polynomial Chaos Solutions of the Stochastic Advection Equation
,
2002,
J. Sci. Comput..
[5]
Marta B. Rosales,et al.
Full modeling of the mooring non-linearity in a two-dimensional floating structure
,
2006
.
[6]
L. Socha,et al.
Linearization in Analysis of Nonlinear Stochastic Systems: Recent Results—Part I: Theory
,
2005
.
[7]
Stuart J. Price,et al.
Structurally Nonlinear Fluttering Airfoil in Turbulent Flow
,
2001
.
[8]
F. Kozin,et al.
The Method of Statistical Linearization for Non-Linear Stochastic Vibrations
,
1988
.
[9]
O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.
Numerical methods in offshore engineering
,
1978
.
[10]
P. Spanos,et al.
Random vibration and statistical linearization
,
1990
.
[11]
Liming Wu,et al.
STOCHASTIC LINEARIZATION: THE THEORY
,
1998
.
[12]
Pierre Bernard.
Stochastic linearization: what is available and what is not
,
1998
.
[13]
Richard M. Feldman,et al.
Applied Probability and Stochastic Processes
,
1995
.
[14]
G. I. Schuëller,et al.
Nonlinear Stochastic Dynamic Engineering Systems
,
1988
.
[15]
Marcos Queija de Siqueira,et al.
A coupled approach for dynamic analysis of CALM systems
,
2002
.