Target current: an appropriate parameter for characterizing the dynamics of laser-matter interaction

A resistive target probes were employed to obtain unique characteristics of the dynamic of the laser-matter interaction through the observation of a return current neutralizing the positive target charge caused by electrons definitely leaving the plasma. Experimental observations show that three phases of the laser-produced plasma are well recognized, i.e. the plasma ignition phase, active plasma phase, and afterglow phase already for the lowest laser intensity at the focal point of 108 Wcm-2 . Then, at higher intensities the first two phases strongly dominate and the target current reaches a value of 10 kA. A throughput of plasma barrier for the fastest electrons leaving the plasma is defined, and its value is experimentally estimated. We also present key experiments proving that the duration of the electrical charge on the target is much longer than the duration of the laser-plasma interaction for the entire intensity range.

[1]  N. Woolsey,et al.  EMP control and characterization on high-power laser systems , 2018, High Power Laser Science and Engineering.

[2]  Miroslav Pfeifer,et al.  Spectral and temporal characteristics of target current and electromagnetic pulse induced by nanosecond laser ablation , 2017 .

[3]  R. P. Godwin.  Experiments with Laser-Produced Plasmas: Electrons, Ions, and Neutrons , 1974 .

[4]  D Raffestin,et al.  Dynamic model of target charging by short laser pulse interactions. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Heinrich Hora,et al.  Physical mechanisms leading to high currents of highly charged ions in laser-driven ion sources , 1996 .

[6]  N. Woolsey,et al.  Guiding of relativistic electron beams in dense matter by laser-driven magnetostatic fields , 2018, Nature Communications.

[7]  D Raffestin,et al.  Physics of giant electromagnetic pulse generation in short-pulse laser experiments. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  P. Mora,et al.  Plasma expansion into a vacuum. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[9]  M. Donovan,et al.  Diagnostics improvement in the ABC facility and preliminary tests on laser interaction with light-atom clusters and p+11B targets , 2013 .

[10]  V. Tikhonchuk,et al.  Target charging in short-pulse-laser-plasma experiments. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Deanna M. Pennington,et al.  Energetic proton generation in ultra-intense laser–solid interactions , 2000 .

[12]  Josef Krasa,et al.  Characteristics of target polarization by laser ablation , 2015 .

[13]  L. Duvillaret,et al.  Time-resolved absolute measurements by electro-optic effect of giant electromagnetic pulses due to laser-plasma interaction in nanosecond regime , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Josef Krasa,et al.  Target current: a useful parameter for characterizing laser ablation , 2017 .

[15]  D. White,et al.  Mitigation of Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Effects from Short-Pulse Lasers and Fusion Neutrons , 2009 .

[16]  J. Krása,et al.  EMP characterization at PALS on solid-target experiments , 2018, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion.

[17]  Josef Krasa,et al.  Revealing of hydrodynamic and electrostatic factors in the center-of-mass velocity of an expanding plasma generated by pulsed laser ablation , 2011 .