Understanding how a sport-helmet protects the head from closed injury by virtual impact tests.

Understanding how a helmet protects the head, especially the soft brain tissues, is the prerequisite for improving helmet design. Intracranial pressure and stresses/strains in the brain tissues are the direct indicators of traumatic brain injury and they can be used to measure helmet performance. In this study, the effects of helmet design parameters such as the helmet shell stiffness, liner compliance and thickness on the brain injury indicators were investigated by virtual impact tests. A finite element head model (FEHM) was first constructed from medical images; a personally-fitted helmet made of composite material and foam was virtually prototyped using geometric information extracted from the FEHM; a helmet-head finite element model was then assembled. Virtual impact tests were conducted using the resulting helmet-head model. The obtained results suggested that, if the helmet shell already has adequate strength to resist excessive deformation and fracture, further increasing shell stiffness and strength would not considerably reduce intracranial pressure and brain strains; to reach the maximum protection with the available materials, the key is to effectively use the second stage in the stress-strain history of the liner foam material.

[1]  W J Curnow,et al.  The efficacy of bicycle helmets against brain injury. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Z. Li,et al.  Finite-element study of cerebrospinal fluid in mitigating closed head injuries , 2012, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[3]  R. Bullock,et al.  Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[4]  A. G. Gross,et al.  A new theory on the dynamics of brain concussion and brain injury. , 1958, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Sikhanda Satapathy,et al.  Effect of Helmet Pads on the Load Transfer to Head under Blast Loadings , 2014 .

[7]  P. Wriggers.  Finite element algorithms for contact problems , 1995 .

[8]  R. Kersey,et al.  Analysis of the Impact Performance of Ice Hockey Helmets Using Two Different Test Methodologies , 2009 .

[9]  J. Mcelhaney,et al.  A viscoelastic study of scalp, brain, and dura. , 1970, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Yunhua Luo,et al.  Recent Progress in Application of FEM in Study of Non-penetrating Brain Injuries , 2008 .

[11]  A. Holbourn.  MECHANICS OF HEAD INJURIES , 1943 .

[12]  Pj Bishop,et al.  Impact Performance Characteristics of Hockey Helmets with Liners of Differing Thicknesses , 2000 .

[13]  Svein Kleiven,et al.  Evaluation of head injury criteria using a finite element model validated against experiments on localized brain motion, intracerebral acceleration, and intracranial pressure , 2006 .

[14]  A. Holbourn,et al.  Mechanism of head injuries , 1943 .

[15]  King H. Yang,et al.  A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  Thomas Blaine Hoshizaki,et al.  A Comparison of Peak Linear and Angular Headform Accelerations Using Ice Hockey Helmets , 2009 .

[17]  A. Sances,et al.  Finite-element models of the human head , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[18]  Werner Goldsmith,et al.  The state of head injury biomechanics: past, present, and future part 2: physical experimentation. , 2005, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[19]  A I King,et al.  Human head dynamic response to side impact by finite element modeling. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[20]  P. Viot,et al.  BEHAVIOUR OF POLYMERIC MULTISCALE FOAM UNDER DYNAMIC LOADING -STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF THE DENSITY AND THE WALLS OF BEADS , 2011 .

[21]  W Goldsmith,et al.  The state of head injury biomechanics: past, present, and future: part 1. , 2001, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[22]  A. McKee,et al.  Helmets and mouth guards: the role of personal equipment in preventing sport-related concussions. , 2011, Clinics in sports medicine.

[23]  D. E. Vlachos,et al.  Finite element analysis of impact damage response of composite motorcycle safety helmets , 2002 .

[24]  Philippe Viot,et al.  Hydrostatic compression on polypropylene foam , 2009 .

[25]  M. G. Lötter,et al.  The indirect use of CT numbers to establish material properties needed for Monte Carlo calculation of dose distributions in patients. , 1998, Medical physics.

[26]  A. Nahum,et al.  Intracranial Pressure Dynamics During Head Impact , 1977 .

[27]  Yunhua Luo,et al.  A QCT-Based Nonsegmentation Finite Element Head Model for Studying Traumatic Brain Injury , 2015, Applied bionics and biomechanics.

[28]  Robert J. Johnson,et al.  Do Helmets Reduce Fatalities or Merely Alter the Patterns of Death , 2008 .

[29]  Ying Chen,et al.  MRI-based finite element modeling of head trauma: spherically focusing shear waves , 2010, Acta Mechanica.

[30]  M. Ziejewski,et al.  A Multi-Scale Finite Element Model for Shock Wave-Induced Axonal Brain Injury , 2008 .

[31]  Ho-Sung Kang,et al.  Three-Dimensional Human Head Finite-Element Model Validation Against Two Experimental Impacts , 1999, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  Nicholas J. Mills,et al.  FEA of oblique impact tests on a motorcycle helmet , 2009 .